Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:19:01.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The third sector in a strategically selective landscape – the case of commissioning public services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2020

ROB MACMILLAN Open the ORCID record for ROB MACMILLAN [Opens in a new window]  and
ANGELA ELLIS PAINE
ROB MACMILLAN
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University, email: [email protected]
ANGELA ELLIS PAINE
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of a mixed economy of welfare, public policy in the UK and elsewhere has long promoted third sector involvement in delivering public services. A growing research literature consistently highlights the challenges third sector organisations face engaging with a demanding public services commissioning environment, but it tends to lack a theoretical basis and can offer misleading accounts of third sector organisations as relatively passive and powerless in the face of wider forces. This article argues that third sector organisations actively operate within and seek to shape a commissioning context which advantages some strategies and some types of organisation over others. To provide stronger theoretical foundations for understanding public services commissioning and the third sector, the concept of ‘strategic selectivity’ (Hay, 2002) is applied to in-depth qualitative longitudinal data from third sector organisations delivering a range of public services. The article contributes new theoretical insights into the dynamic ways in which social policies and public services are organised. The analysis highlights how differently positioned organisations seek to read, navigate pathways through, and transform an uneven public services commissioning landscape.

Keywords

Public servicesthird sectorcommissioningstrategic selectivity
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 606 - 626
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACEVO (2003), Replacing the State? The case for third sector public service delivery, London: ACEVO.Google Scholar
ACEVO (2015), Remaking the State: Remaking the Social Contract between Public Services and Our Most Vulnerable Citizens, Summary Recommendations of the ACEVO Commission into Delivering Better Public Services, London: ACEVO.Google Scholar
Aiken, M. and Harris, M. (2017), ‘The ‘hollowing out’ of smaller third sector organisations?’, Voluntary Sector Review, 8(3), 333–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénard, C., Davies, J., Dobbs, J., Hornung, L., Jochum, V., Lawson, M. and McGarvey, A. (2018), The UK Civil Society Almanac 2018, London: NCVO.Google Scholar
Benson, A. (2014), “The devil that has come amongst us”: The impact of commissioning and procurement practices’ National Coalition of Independent Action Inquiry into the Future of Voluntary Services: Working paper six, London: NCIA.Google Scholar
Benson, A. (2015), ‘Voluntary action, the state and the market’, Soundings, 60, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, A. with Bush, H. and Bhutta, M. (2005), The reform of public services: the role of the voluntary sector, London: NCVO.Google Scholar
Bovaird, T., Briggs, I. and Willis, M. (2014), ‘Strategic Commissioning in the UK: Service Improvement Cycle or Just Going Round in Circles?’, Local Government Studies, 40(4), 533–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, H. (2009), ‘Competition and contracts in the voluntary sector: Exploring the implications for homeless service providers in Southampton’, Policy & Politics, 37(2), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, H. (2012), ‘Capturing Diversity: A Typology of Third Sector Organisations’ Responses to Contracting Based on Empirical Evidence from Homelessness Services’, Journal of Social Policy, 41(3), 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J., Dobbs, J., Kane, D. and Wilding, K. (2009), The State and the Voluntary Sector: Recent trends in Government Funding and Public Service Delivery, London: NCVO.Google Scholar
Civil Exchange (2016), Independence in Question: the voluntary sector in 2016. London: Civil Exchange.Google Scholar
Dickhaus, D. (2010), ‘The selectivity of translation: accountability regimes in Chilean and South African higher education’, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(2), 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis Paine, A. and Macmillan, R. (2019), Telling tales of commissioning: insights from a qualitative longitudinal study of third sector organisations (TSRC Working Paper, Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre).Google Scholar
Gash, T., Panchamia, N., Sams, S. and Hotson, L. (2013), Making public service markets work: Professionalising government’s approach to commissioning and market stewardship, London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2002), Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, J. (2011), ‘The changing architecture of the UK welfare state’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(4), 589–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HM Government (2011), Open Public Services White Paper, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
HM Government (2018), Civil Society Strategy: building a future that works for everyone, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Hornung, L., Chan, O., Dobbs, J., Jochum, V., Lawson, M., McGarvey, A. and Rooney, K. (2019), The UK Civil Society Almanac 2019, London: NCVO.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2000), ‘From the KWNS to the SWPR’ in Lewis, G., Gewirtz, S. and Clarke, J. (eds), Rethinking Social Policy, London: Sage, pp.171–184.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2002), The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2016), The State: Past, Present, Future, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, A.E.G., While, A. and Gibbs, D.C. (2004), ‘State modernisation and local strategic selectivity after Local Agenda 21: evidence from three northern English localities’, Policy & Politics, 32(2), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, J. and Bartlett, W. (eds) (1993), Quasi-Markets and Social Policy, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (1999), ‘Voluntary and Informal Welfare’ in Page, R.M. and Silburn, R. (eds) British Social Welfare in the Twentieth Century, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyds Bank Foundation for England and Wales (2016), Commissioning in crisis: How current contracting and procurement processes threaten the survival of small charities, London: Lloyds Bank Foundation for England and Wales.Google Scholar
Macmillan, R. (2011), Seeing things differently? The promise of qualitative longitudinal research on the third sector (TSRC Working Paper 56, Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre).Google Scholar
Macmillan, R., Taylor, R., Arvidson, M., Soteri-Proctor, A. and Teasdale, S. (2013), The third sector in unsettled times: a field guide (TSRC Working Paper 109, Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre).Google Scholar
Martikke, S. and Moxham, C. (2010), ‘Public sector commissioning: Experiences of voluntary organizations delivering health and social services’, International Journal of Public Administration, 33, 790–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbourne, L. (2013), Voluntary sector in transition: Hard times or new opportunities?, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Milbourne, L. and Cushman, M. (2015), ‘Complying, transforming or resisting the new austerity? Realigning social welfare and independent action among English voluntary sector organisations’, Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 463–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. and Rees, J. (2014), ‘Mental health commissioning: Master or subject of change’ Mental Health Review, 19(3), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, B., Henwood, K. and Holland, J. (2012), ‘Researching lives through time: An introduction to the Timescapes approach’, Qualitative Research, 12(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. (ed) (2019), Understanding the mixed economy of welfare, 2nd edition, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Raza, W (2016), ‘Politics of scale and strategic selectivity in the liberalisation of public services – the role of trade in services’, New Political Economy, 21(2), 204–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, J. (2014), ‘Public sector commissioning and the third sector: Old wine in new bottles?’ Public Policy and Administration, 29(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, J. and Mullins, D. (eds) (2016), The Third Sector Delivering Public Services: Developments, innovations and challenges, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, J., Miller, R. and Buckingham, H. (2017), ‘Commission incomplete: exploring the new model for purchasing public services from the third sector’, Journal of Social Policy, 46(1), 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldana, J. (2003), Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change through Time, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Sturgess, G.L. (2018), ‘Public service commissioning: origins, influences and characteristics’, Policy Design and Practice, 1(3), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. (2007), ‘The qualitative longitudinal case history: Practical, methodological and ethical reflections’, Social Policy and Society, 6(4), 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar