Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:18:22.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Street-level Practice of Russia's Social Policymaking in Saint Petersburg: Federalism, Informal Politics, and Domestic Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2015

JANET ELISE JOHNSON ,
MERI KULMALA  and
MAIJA JÄPPINEN
JANET ELISE JOHNSON
Affiliation:
2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn College, City University of New York Brooklyn, NY 11210USA1 email: [email protected]
MERI KULMALA
Affiliation:
Finnish Center of Excellence in Russian Studies – Choices of Russian Modernisation Aleksanteri Institute, BOX 42, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland email: [email protected]
MAIJA JÄPPINEN
Affiliation:
Finnish Center of Excellence in Russian Studies – Choices of Russian Modernisation Aleksanteri Institute, BOX 42, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the growth in studies of Russian social policy, the reality of the social policy process – most of which is regionally based – remains a puzzle. In this article, we stake a claim for the importance of studying street-level social service provision in Russia's regions to advance the understanding of social policymaking in authoritarian-leaning regimes. We show that – albeit in small ways in only some places – Russia has expanded its welfare state, taking on an issue neglected by the Soviet regime in response to activism. Using the lens of work against domestic violence, we conduct a case study of women's crisis centres in Saint Petersburg. We show the limitations of the two usual state-society frameworks – those looking at civil society and at the welfare state. Building on their strengths, we construct a de facto feminist framework that focuses on how much and what kind of help citizens receive from both state and societal actors. In Russia's social policymaking, shaped by federalism, we find mixed success –civic organizations have weakened, but the state has taken on civic initiatives at local levels – and point to the importance of the informal politics of speaking in code and navigating elite networks.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 287 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertulakin, V. (2007), ’Organizatsionnye resursy professionalizatsii spetsialistov po sotsial'noi rabote‘, in Iarskaia-Smirnova, E. and Romanov, P., eds., Professii.doc. Sotsial'nye transformatsii professionalizma: vzgliady naruzhi, vzgliady iznutri. Moscow: Variant, 246–265.Google Scholar
Beznosova, O. and Sundstrom, L. (2009), ’Western Aid and the State-Society Balance in Novgorod and Khabarovsk‘, Problems of Post-Communism 56: 6, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerami, A. (2009), ’Welfare State Developments in the Russian Federation: Oil-led Social Policy and ‘The Russian Miracle’‘, Social Policy & Administration 43: 2, 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. (2013), Democracy, Gender, and Social Policy in Russia. A Wayward Society, Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, L. (2011), ‘Russia's Welfare Regime: The Shift Toward Statism’, in Jäppinen, M., Kulmala, M. and Saarinen, A., eds., Gazing at Welfare, Gender and Agency in Post-socialist Countries, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 14–35.Google Scholar
Cook, L. (2007), Postcommunist Welfare States: Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, B. (2000), ‘Eastern European welfare states: The impacts of the politics of globalization’, Journal of European Social Policy, 10: 2, 146–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, J. (2010), Rethinking Contemporary Feminist Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2010), Violence against Women and the Role of Gender Equality, Social Inclusion and Health Strategies, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Fotaki, M. (2009), ’Informal Payments: A Side Effect of Transition or a Mechanism for Sustaining the Illusion of ‘Free’ Health Care? The Experience of Four Regions in the Russian Federation‘, Journal of Social Policy 38: 4, 649–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gel'man, V. (2015), Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet Regime Change, Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentleman, A. (2015), ’Breaking the taboo: the Moscow women taking a stand against domestic violence‘, The Guardian, June 10, http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/jun/10/moscow-domestic-violence-problem-russiaGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S. and Kaufman, R. (2008), Development, democracy, and welfare states: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. (2006), Informal institutions and democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, S. (2002), ‘Shaping Civic Advocacy’, in Prakash, A. and Gugerty, M., eds., Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 252–80.Google Scholar
Hemment, J. (2012), ’Nashi, Youth Voluntarism, and Potemkin NGOs‘, Slavic Review 71: 2, 234–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, L. (2010), Red to Green: Environmental Activism in Post-Soviet Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, M. and Weldon, S. L. (2012), ‘The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence against Women in Global Perspective, 1975–2005’, American Political Science Review 106: 3, 548–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iarskaia-Smirnova, E. (2011), Class and Gender in Russian Welfare Policies: Soviet Legacies and Contemporary Challenges. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Jäppinen, M. (2011), ‘Tensions between Familialism and Feminism: Domestic Violence Frameworks in a Women's Crisis Centre’, in Jäppinen, M., Kulmala, M. and Saarinen, A., eds., Gazing at Welfare, Gender and Agency in Post-socialist Countries, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambrigde Scholars Publishing, 125–44.Google Scholar
Jäppinen, M. (2015), Väkivaltatyön käytännöt, sukupuoli ja toimijuus. Etnografinen tutkimus lähisuhdeväkivaltaa kokeneiden naisten auttamistyöstä Venäjällä, Publications of the Department of Social Research 2015: 3. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Jäppinen, M. and Johnson, J. (forthcoming), ‘The State to the Rescue? The Contested Terrain of Domestic Violence in Post-communist Russia’, in Stefatos, K. and Salvi, C., eds., Gender Violence, Conflict, and the State. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Javeline, D. and Lindemann-Komarova, S. (2010), ‘A Balanced Assessment of Russian Civil Society’, Journal of International Affairs, 63: 2, 171–88.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. (2009), Gender Violence in Russia: The Politics of Feminist Intervention. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. (2014), ‘Pussy Riot as a feminist project: Russia's gendered informal politics’, Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 42: 4, 583–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. and Saarinen, A. (2011), ‘Assessing civil society in Putin's Russia: The plight of Women's Crisis Centers’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44: 1, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. and Saarinen, A. (2013), ‘Twenty-First-Century Feminisms under Repression: Gender Regime Change and the Women's Crisis Center Movement in Russia’, Signs 38: 3, 543–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kainu, M., Kulmala, M., Nikula, J. and Kivinen, M. (forthcoming), ‘The Russian Welfare State System: With Special Reference to Regional Inequality’, in Aspalter, C., ed., Welfare State Systems. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kulmala, M. (2013), State and Society in Small-town Russia. A Feminist-ethnographic Inquiry into the Boundaries of Society in the Finnish-Russian Borderland. Department of Social Research 2013: 14. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kulmala, M. (2014), ‘Karelian Women's Network – a (Feminist) Women's Movement?’, in Saarinen, A., Ekonen, K., and Uspenskaia, V., eds., Women and Transformation in Russia. London and New York: Routledge, 163–188.Google Scholar
Kulmala, M., Kainu, M., Nikula, J. and Kivinen, M. (2014), ‘Paradoxes of Agency: Democracy and Welfare in Russia’, Demokratizatsiya – the Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 4 (2014), 523–552.Google Scholar
Kulmala, M. and Tarasenko, A. (forthcoming), ‘”We Are the Electorate”: Russian Veterans’ Organizations Mediating between the State and Society’, Europe-Asia Studies.Google Scholar
Liapounova, O. and Dracheva, I. (2004), ‘Crisis Centres for Women in North West Russia: Ideology, Management and Practice’, in Saarinen, A. and Carey-Bélanger, E., eds., Crisis Centres and Violence against Women. Dialogue in the Barents Region Arkhangel'sk and Oulu: University of Oulu.Google Scholar
McFaul, M. and Stoner Weiss, K. (2008), ‘Myth of Authoritarian Model,’ Foreign Affairs, January/February (2008), 68–84.Google Scholar
Moreau, M. (1990), Empowerment through advocacy and consciousness raising: Implications for a structural approach to social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 17: 2, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orttung, R. (2008, ed), Nations in Transit. http://www.freedomhouse.hu/images/fdh_galleries/NIT2008/NT-Russia-final1.pdf.Google Scholar
Pape, U. (2014), The Politics of HIV/AIDS in Russia, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Penn, J. (2007), ‘The Development of Social Work Education in Russia since 1995’, European Journal of Social Work 10: 4, 513–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polese, A., Morris, J., Kovác, B. and Harboe, I. (2014),’’Welfare States’ and Social Policies in Eastern Europe and the Former USSR: Where Informality Fits in?’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22: 2, 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivkin-Fish, M. (2010), ‘Pronatalism, Gender Politics, and the Renewal of Family Support in Russia: Toward a Feminist Anthropology of ‘Maternity Capital’, Slavic Review 69: 3, 701–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanov, P. and Iarskaia-Smirnova, E. (2014), ‘Sotsial'naia rabota v sovremennoi Rossii: analiz statusa professionalnoi gruppy. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia 41: 10, 60–69.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. and Anheier, H. (1998), ‘Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit sector Cross-nationally’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 9: 3, 213–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, V. (1999), Organizing Women in Contemporary Russia. Engendering Transition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, V. (2015), Sex, Politics, & Putin: Political Legitimacy in Russia. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, L. (2006), Funding Civil Society. Foreign Assistance and NGO Development in Russia. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, L. (2010), ‘Russian Women's Activism: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back’, in Amrita Basu, ed., Women's Movements in the Global Era. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, K. (2006), ‘Disability Organizations in the Regions’ in Evans, A., Henry, L., and Sundstrom, L., eds., Russian Civil Society: A Critical Assessment, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 229–245.Google Scholar
Turbine, V. (2012), ‘Women's Use of Legal Advice and Claims in Contemporary Russia: the Impact of Gender and Class’, in Salmenniemi, S., ed., Rethinking Class in Russia. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 167–186.Google Scholar
Zabelina, T. (1999), ’Rossiya i SNG: krizisnye tsentry v deistvii’, in Dozhtizheniya i nakhodki: krizisnye tsentry Rossii. Moscow: Press-Solo.Google Scholar
Zdravomyslova, E. (2005), ’Venäjän kansalaisjärjestöt ja kansalaisaktiivisuus Venäjällä’, in Leppänen, A., ed., Kansalaisyhteiskunta liikkeessä yli rajojen: sosiaali- ja terveysalan järjestöt lähialueyhteistyössä. Helsinki: Palmenia-kustannus, 204–214.Google Scholar