Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T00:15:05.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Pensions and the Growth of Social Welfare Expenditure*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Ken Judge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The enormous growth of state expenditure in advanced industrial societies during the thirty years after the second world war is widely acknowledged and many attempts have been made to account for the phenomenon. Most of these explanations, however, either isolate specific factors or are applicable at a very high level of generality and so make it difficult to develop a wider understanding of the growth of the modern welfare state. This article is predicated upon the assumption that one way to overcome this difficulty is to identify, and evaluate the importance of, the different factors which have stimulated the growth of specific programmes rather than aggregate expenditures. It examines the growth of state spending on national insurance pensions in the United Kingdom between 1951 and 1978, therefore, because this is the most expensive of all social programmes. The primary purpose of the article is to identify, discuss and assess the relative importance of the most important causal factors which account for the growth of spending on pensions. This analysis is based upon the decomposition of the growth into its most important constituent parts. An attempt is also made to employ multiple regression to investigate changes in the real rate of basic pension, but the conclusion reached in this particular case is that it is a poor substitute for historical case studies. Finally, some speculative thoughts are advanced about possible future trends in spending on basic state pensions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1981 , pp. 503 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Judge, Ken, ‘Is there a “crisis” in the welfare state?’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, (1981, forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Derived from Abstract of Statistics for Index of Retail Prices, Average Earnings, Social Security Benefits and Contributions, Department of Health and Social Security, May 1980, table 6.3a.Google Scholar

3 See Wagner, R. E. and Weber, W. E., ‘Wagner's Law, Fiscal Institutions and the Growth of Government’, National Tax Journal, 30:1 (03 1977).Google Scholar

4 Peacock, A. and Wiseman, J., The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom, Allen and Unwin, London, 2nd edition, 1967.Google Scholar

5 O'Connor, J., The Fiscal Crisis of the State, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Gough, Ian, The Political Economy of the Welfare State, Macmillan, London, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Buchanan, J. M. and Wagner, R. E., Democracy in Deficit: the Political Legacy of Lord Keynes, Academic Press, New York, 1977.Google Scholar

8 Breton, Albert, The Economic Theory of Representative Government, Macmillan, London, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Ermisch, J., ‘The Impact of Demographic Change upon Public Expenditure and Infrastructure Investment’, Studies in Population Change and Social Planning – Working Paper No. 4, Centre for Studies in Social Policy, London, 1977.Google Scholar

10 See HM Treasury, Public Expenditure White Papers: Handbook on Methodology, HMSO, London, 1972.Google Scholar

11 See Buchanan, J. M. et al. , The Economics of Politics, Readings 18, Institute of Economic Affairs, London, 1978.Google Scholar

12 See Borcherding, T. E. and Deacon, R. T., ‘The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments’, American Economic Review, 62 (12 1972), 891–901.Google Scholar

13 Bird, R. M., Charging for Public Services: A New Look at an Old Idea, Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto, 1976.Google Scholar

14 Morgan, D. R., Over-Taxation by Inflation, Hobart Paper 72, Institute of Economic Affairs, London, 1977.Google Scholar

15 Judge, Ken and Hampson, Roger, ‘Political Advertising and the Growth of Social Welfare Expenditures’, International Journal of Social Economics, 7:2 (1980), 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Borcherding, Thomas E., ‘The Sources of Growth of Public Expenditures in the United States, 1902–1970’, in Borcherding, Thomas E. (ed.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, Duke University Press. Durham, 1977, pp. 45–70.Google Scholar

17 Ibid. p. 56.

18 Gough, , op. cit.Google Scholar

19 Ibid. pp. 88–9.

20 A similar comparative analysis has been published by the OECD, but for a shorter time period (1962–72) and using a less helpful dependent variable: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Public Expenditure on Income Maintenance Programmes, Studies in Resource Allocation, No. 3, OECD, Paris, 1976.Google Scholar

21 See Taira, Koji and Kilby, Peter, ‘Differences in Social Security Development in Selected Countries’, International Social Security Review, 22:2 (1969), 139–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; George, Vic, Social Security: Beveridge and After, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1968, ch. 8Google Scholar; and Heclo, Hugh, Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1974.Google Scholar

22 Munnell, Alicia H., The Future of Social Security, The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C., 1977.Google Scholar

23 Social Insurance and Allied Services (Beveridge Report), Cmd. 6404, HMSO, London, 1942.Google Scholar

24 See Reddin, Mike, ‘National insurance and private pensions’, in Jones, K. (ed.), The Year Book of Social Policy in Britain 1976, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977, pp. 79–95.Google Scholar

25 Social Insurance and Allied Services, op. cit. para. 233.

26 Social Insurance and Allied Services, op. cit. para. 244.

27 Ibid.. para. 245.

28 Heclo, , op. cit. p. 256Google Scholar.

29 George, , op. cit. p. 165.Google Scholar

30 Munnell, , op. cit. p. 62.Google Scholar

31 Social Trends 10, Central Statistical Office, HMSO, London, 1979Google Scholar, table 5.2.

32 Clark, Robert, Kreps, Juanita and Spengler, Joseph, ‘Economics of Aging: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, 16 (09 1978), 932.Google Scholar

33 Boskin, Michael J., ‘Social Security and Retirement Decisions’, Economic Inquiry, 15:1 (1977), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Zabalza, A., Pissarides, C. A. and Piachaud, D., Social Security, Life-Cycle Saving and Retirement, Centre for Labour Economics Discussion Paper No. 43, LSE, 1978, p. 24.Google Scholar

35 Kincair, J. C., Poverty and Inequality in Britain, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1973, p. 13.Google Scholar

36 Atkinson, A. B., ‘Inequality and Social Security’, in Townsend, P. and Bosanquet, N. (eds), Labour and Inequality, Fabian Society, London, 1972, p. 15.Google Scholar

37 Marshall, G. P., ‘Income Taxation and the U.K. Flat-rate Retirement Pension’, Social and Economic Administration, 12:3 (Winter 1978), 220.Google Scholar

38 Clark, Robert L. and Spengler, Joseph J., The Economics of Individual and Population Ageing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980, p. 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 Schulz, James H., ‘Pension Policy at a Crossroads: What should be the Pension Mix?’, The Gerontologist, 21:1 (1981), 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 George, , op. cit. p. 163.Google Scholar

41 Social Insurance and Allied Services, op. cit. para. 245. In fact the Government Actuary concluded at the time that ‘the tendency to retire will be somewhat stronger’ if the Beveridge plan was implemented, Ibid. p. 197.

42 Heclo, , op. cit. p. 258.Google Scholar

43 Atkinson, , op. cit. p. 16.Google Scholar

44 Tufte, Edward R., Political Control of the Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1978, p. 28.Google Scholar

45 Kincaid, , op. cit. p. 201.Google Scholar

46 Heclo, , op. cit. p. 257.Google Scholar

47 Ibid. p. 260.

48 Ibid. p. 258.

49 Browning, Edgar K., ‘Why the Social Insurance Budget is too Large in a Democracy’, Economic Inquiry, 13 (09 1975), 373–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50 Kenneth V. Greene, ‘Over expansion in the Social Insurance Budget and the Constitutional Perspective’, and Browning, Edgar K., ‘Social Insurance: the Constitutional Perspective’, Economic Inquiry, 15 (07 1977), 449–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Benjamin Bridges, ‘Why the social Insurance Budget is too large in a Democracy: Comment’ and Browning, Edgar K., ‘Why the Social Insurance Budget is too large in a Democracy: A Reply’, Economic Inquiry, 16 (01 1978), 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 General Secretariat of the ISSA, ‘Developments and Trends in Social Security, 1974–77’. International Social Security Review, 30:3 (1977), 273.Google Scholar

52 Various non-linear transformations were investigated but none were found to be significant.

53 Heclo, , op. cit. p. 257.Google Scholar

54 One commentator has suggested that this can be explained in part by the absence of a relationship between retirement status and attitudes to welfare. Pensioners are cross-pressured by the conservatism of their age on the one hand and their financial need for income maintenance on the other; Whiteley, Paul, ‘Public Opinion and the Demand for Social Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 10:4 (10 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 Macmillan, Harold, Riding the Storm, 1956–59, Macmillan, London, 1971, p. 185.Google Scholar

56 Ibid. p. 350.

57 Ibid. p. 345.

58 Ibid. p. 366.

59 Ibid. p. 362.

60 Ibid. p. 359.

61 The Times, 6 11 1957, p. 10.Google Scholar

62 Ibid. 3 September 1973, p. 2.

63 Ibid. 5 September 1973, p. 1.

64 Ibid. 19 March 1974, p. 2.

65 Heclo, , op. cit. p. 260.Google Scholar

66 Social Trends, 10, op. cit. table 1.2.

67 Unless the minimum pension age is lowered. See the discussion in Growing Older, Department of Health and Social Security, Cmnd. 8173, HMSO, London, 1981, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar

68 Ibid. p. 7.