Article contents
The State, Class Ideology and Social Policy*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2009
Abstract
This article suggests that a central tradition in social administration finds difficulty in accommodating theoretical perspectives which offer a thorough-going critique of the suitability of the state as a vehicle for maximizing welfare. The point is illustrated through consideration of social administration's treatment of marxist work on the problem of how contemporary capitalist welfare states can retain political legitimacy. Two possible solutions to the problem in the work of Marx and subsequent marxists are identified. One stresses the success of the dominant class in persuading the subordinate class of the legitimacy of its power. The other argues that this process is aided by the ideological framework in which it takes place and that this framework of ideas results not only from the activity of the ruling class but also from the experience of everyday life in capitalist society. The former tends to be the version of marxism presented in social administration treatment. It offers a less radical critique because it can be taken to suggest that the main barrier to welfare lies in the individual members of a particular social group who can in principal be defeated in a ‘battle for consciousness’; and not so much in a particular kind of social life, which represents a more profound obstacle.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981
References
1 Kuhn, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970, p. 169.Google Scholar
2 Marcuse, H., One Dimensional Man, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964, p. 1Google Scholar and passim.
3 See Baker, J., ‘Social Conscience and Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 8:2 (1979), 190–7 and 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 George, V. and Wilding, P., ‘Social Class, Social Values and Social Policy’, Social and Economic Administration, 6:3 (1972), 237.Google Scholar
5 George, V. and Wilding, P., Ideology and Social Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1976, p. 118.Google Scholar
6 For example McIntosh, M., ‘The State and the Oppression of Women’ in Kuhn, A. and Wolpe, A. (eds), Feminism and Materialism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1978, pp. 254–89.Google Scholar
7 See Land, H. and Parker, R., ‘Family Policies in Britain’ in Kahn, A. and Kamerman, S. (eds), Family Policy, Columbia University Press, New York, 1978, pp. 331–66Google Scholar; and Wilson, E., Women and the Welfare State, Tavistock, London, 1977.Google Scholar
8 See Friedman, M., Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962, ch. 2Google Scholar; and Seldon, A., Charge, Temple-Smith, London, 1978.Google Scholar
9 Most cogently argued in Nozick, R., Anarchy State and Utopia, Blackwell, Oxford, 1974, ch. 7.Google Scholar
10 For example, Hayek, F., Individualism and Economic Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1949, ch. 1.Google Scholar
11 Marx, K. and Engels, F., The Communist Manifesto, Foreign Language Press, Peking, 1972, p. 30.Google Scholar
12 See Plamenatz, J., Ideology, Macmillan, London, 1971, p. 15.Google Scholar
13 Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. and Sandford, R., The Authoritarian Personality, Harper and Row, New York, 1950, p. 2.Google Scholar
14 Converse, P., “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics”, in Apter, D. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, Free Press, New York, 1964, p. 207Google Scholar; and Christenson, R., Ideologies and Modern Politics, Nelson, London, 1972, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
15 Berger, P. and Luckmann, T., The Social Construction of Reality, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1971, p. 18.Google Scholar
16 Feuer, L., ‘Beyond Ideology’ in Waxman, C. (ed.), The End of Ideology Debate, Funk and Wagnalls, New York, 1968, p. 64.Google Scholar
17 Mannheim, K., Ideology and Utopia, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1936, p. 239.Google Scholar
18 Minar, D., ‘Ideology and Political Behaviour’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 5 (1961), 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Westergaard, J. and Resler, H., Class in a Capitalist Society, Heinemann, London, 1975, p. 391.Google Scholar
20 Popper, K., The Open Society and its Enemies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1966, p. 216Google Scholar; see also Plamenatz, J., Man and Society, London, 1963, Vol. II, p. 327.Google Scholar
21 Marx, K., ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon’ in Feuer, L. (ed.), Marx and Engels, Fontana, London, 1969, p. 360.Google Scholar
22 Berger, and Luckman, , op. cit. p. 79.Google Scholar
23 Giddens, A., New Rules of Sociological Method, Hutchinson, London, 1976, p. 160.Google Scholar
24 Althusser, L., For Marx, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1969, p. 33.Google Scholar
25 Lenin, V., ‘The Three Sources of Marxism’, in Selected Works, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1967, p. 41.Google Scholar
26 Gouldner, A., The Two Marxisms, Seabury Press, New York, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 See Gough, I., The Political Economy of the Welfare State, Macmillan, London, 1979, p. 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Marx, K. and Engels, F., The German Ideology, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1970, p. 64.Google Scholar
29 Marx, and Engels, , Communist Manifesto, p. 55.Google Scholar
30 Miliband, R., The State in a Capitalist Society, Quartet, London, 1973, p. 6.Google Scholar
31 Ibid. p. 62.
32 Ibid. p. 71.
33 Ibid. pp. 159–60.
34 See Blackburn, R. (ed.), Ideology in Social Science, Fontana, London, 1972, ch. 11Google Scholar; and Holloway, J. and Picciotto, S. (eds), State and Capital, Edward Arnold, London, 1978, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
35 Miliband, R., Marxism and Politics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1977, p. 50.Google Scholar
36 Ibid. p. 65.
37 Ibid. pp. 73–4.
38 Ibid. p. 87.
39 O'Connor, J., The Fiscal Crisis of the State, St. James's Press, London, 1973, ch. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Gough, , op. cit. p. 63.Google Scholar
41 Miliband, , The State in a Capitalist Society, op. cit. p. 50.Google Scholar
42 Gough, , op. cit. p. 64.Google Scholar
43 This is especially clear in Gough, I., ‘Thatcherism and the Welfare State’, Marxism Today (07 1980), 9.Google Scholar
44 Marx, and Engels, , The German Ideology, op. cit. p. 47.Google Scholar
45 Ibid. pp. 64–5.
46 Marx, and Engels, , Communist Manifesto, op. cit. p. 55.Google Scholar
47 Marx, K., ‘Preface to a Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy’, in Feuer, op. cit. p. 84.Google Scholar
48 Marx, K., Capital, vol. I, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1974, p. 77.Google Scholar
49 Geras, N., ‘Marxism and the Critique of Political Economy’, in Blackburn, op. cit. p. 293.Google Scholar
50 Westergaard, J., ‘Return of the Cash Nexus’, in Miliband, R. and Saville, J. (eds), Socialist Register, Merlin Press, London, 1970, p. 129.Google Scholar
51 Marx, K., ‘A Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right”, in Coletti, L. (ed.), Marx: Early Writings, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1975, p. 90.Google Scholar
52 Marshall, T., ‘Citizenship and Social Class’ in Sociology at the Cross-roads, Heinemann. London, 1963, p. 96.Google Scholar
53 Holloway, and , Picciotto, op. cit. p. 30.Google Scholar
54 Offe, C., Industry and Inequality, Edward Arnold, London, 1976, p. 30.Google Scholar
55 Goldthorpe, J., ‘Social Inequality and Social Integration’, in Wedderburn, D. (ed.), Poverty, Inequality and Class Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979, p. 232.Google Scholar
56 Habermas, J., Legitimation Crisis, Beacon Press, Harvard, 1974, part 1, ch. 2 and 3.Google Scholar
57 Quoted in Winch, D., Economics and Society, Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1969, p. 221.Google Scholar
58 Offe, C., ‘Advanced Capitalism and the Welfare State’, Politics and Society, 2:4 (1972), 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59 See Hirsch, F., Social Limits to Growth, Routledge and Kegan Paul. London, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60 Offe, C., ‘Structural Problems of the Capitalist State’, in von Beyme, K. (ed.), German Political Studies, vol. 1, Sage, Beverley Hills, 1974, p. 54.Google Scholar See also the introductory essay by Offe to part III of Lindberg, L., Alford, R.A., Crouch, C. and Offe, C. (eds), Stress and Contradiction in Modern Capitalism, Lexington Books, Massachusetts, 1975.Google Scholar
61 Ginsburg, N., Class, Capital and Social Policy, Macmillan, London, 1979, p. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62 Ginsburg, , op. cit. p. 28.Google Scholar
63 Saville, J., ‘The Welfare State: an Historical Approach’ in Butterworth, E. and Weir, D. (eds), Social Welfare in Modern Britain, Fontana, 1975, p. 56.Google Scholar
64 Saville, , op. cit. p. 69.Google Scholar
65 See Holman, R., Poverty, Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1978, ch. 5Google Scholar; Rein, M., Social Science and Public Policy, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1976, p. 94Google Scholar; Parker, J., Citizenship and Social Policy, Macmillan, London, 1975, ch. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hill, M., Understanding Social Policy, Blackwell, Oxford, 1980, pp. 65–6Google Scholar; Coventry Community Development Project, Final Report Part 1, 1975, p. 11.Google Scholar
66 George, & Wilding, , ‘Social Class, Social Values and Social Policy’, op. cit. 237–8.Google Scholar
67 Ibid. 240.
68 Ibid.
69 Ibid. 241.
70 George, & Wilding, , Ideology and Social Welfare, op. cit. p. 92.Google Scholar
71 Hall, P., Land, H., Parker, R. and Webb, A., Change, Choice and Conflict in Social Policy, Heinemann, London, 1975, p. 141.Google Scholar
72 Ibid. pp. 152–3. Contrast Lukes, S., Power, a Radical View, Macmillan, London, 1975.Google Scholar
73 Room, G., The Sociology of Welfare, Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1979, p. 69.Google Scholar
74 Geras, , op. cit.Google Scholar
75 Plamenatz, J., Ideology, op. cit. p. 23.Google Scholar
76 Mishra, R., Society and Social Policy, Macmillan, London, 1977, p. 63.Google Scholar
77 Ibid. p. 60.
78 Ibid.
79 Room, , op. cit. p. 46.Google Scholar
80 Mishra, , op. cit. p. 73.Google Scholar
81 Room, , op. cit. p. 161.Google Scholar
82 Ibid. pp. 239–40.
83 Mishra, , op. cit. p. 84.Google Scholar
84 Marx, K., Critique of the Gotha Programme, Foreign Language Press, Peking, 1972, p. 17.Google Scholar
85 Mishra, , op. cit. p. 13 and p. 76.Google Scholar
86 See Coletti, , op. cit. pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
87 See Baker, , op. cit.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by