Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T19:17:48.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Stability of Social Security in the United States: The Need for a Durable Institutional Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2017

KENZO YOSHIDA
KENZO YOSHIDA*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Aoyama Gakuin University, 4-4-25 Shibuya, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150–8366, Japan. email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stability is one of the most crucial elements of social security systems. Although the United States is famous – some might say notorious – for drastic changes to its socio-economic structure (including its welfare programmes), its Social Security is the most secure and unchanged public pension programme among major Western countries. In the restructuring age of welfare states, public pensions have been reformed several times in Japan and various European countries, with an overhaul of benefits and taxes. However, Social Security in the US has not undergone such reforms in the three decades since the Social Security Act was amended in 1983, but has experienced relatively better financial conditions. This paper investigates the extent to which Social Security has remained stable during a time when welfare states are going through a crisis. The comparative analysis for stability consists of three steps: (1) a simple evaluation of the frequency of reforms among six countries; (2) a comparison of the scales of parametric adjustment and components of structural reform; and (3) confirming current financial sustainability to check for ‘false stability’ using individual government reports. This paper also studies stability factors, including an institutional design that is durable in this changing environment.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 397 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allianz (2014), 2014 Pension Sustainability Index, International Pension Papers 1/2014.Google Scholar
American Association for Retired Persons (AARP) (2005a), Social Security 70th Anniversary Survey Report Trend Over Time, August 11, 2005.Google Scholar
American Association for Retired Persons (AARP) (2005b), ‘AARP's response to proposed progressive price indexing of Social Security benefits’, AARP Press Release, May 6.Google Scholar
Barr, N. and Diamond, P. (2009), Pension reform: A short guide, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (2005), Ageing and pension reform around the world, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Eglar.Google Scholar
Calmes, J. (2011), ‘Disagreement over payroll tax cut's impact on social security’, The New York Times, December 15.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gallup (2005), ‘Americans appear open to arguments on privatizing social security - Basic support drops after hearing details’, February 7.Google Scholar
Gallup (2011), ‘Americans oppose cuts in education, social security, defense’, January 16.Google Scholar
Goodin, D., Headey, B., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H.J. (1999), The real worlds of welfare capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, S. (2010), ‘The future financial status of the social security program’, Social Security Bulletin, 70, 3, 2010.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. (2002), The divided welfare state, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. (2006), The great risk shift, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005), A brief history of neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, J., Dixon, J. and Drover, G. (2007), ‘Assessing the capacity of pension institutions to build and sustain trust’, Journal of Social Policy, 36, 3, 457–75.Google Scholar
Immergut, E. and Abou-Chadai, T. (2014), ‘How electoral vulnerability affects pension politics: Introducing a concept, measure and empirical application’, European Journal of Political Research, 53, 2, 269–87.Google Scholar
Jackson, B. (2011), ‘Democrats deny social security's red ink’, An article of A Project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, February 25.Google Scholar
Jacoby, S. (1997), Modern manor, welfare capitalism since the new deal, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jansson, B. (2008), The reluctant welfare state, Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Lain, D., Vickerstaff, S. and Loretto, W. (2013), ‘Reforming state pension provision in “liberal” Anglo-Saxon countries’, Social Policy and Society, 12, 1, 77–90.Google Scholar
Lubove, R. (1968), The struggle for social security, 1900–1935, Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, G. (2010), The decline of the traditional pension, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer (2016), Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index, Australian Centre for Financial Studies, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (2013), ‘Changing Social Security in the US: Rising insecurity?’, Social Policy and Society, 12, 1, 135–46.Google Scholar
Myers, R. (1993), Social security (4th edition), Philadelphia: Pension Research Council and University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) (2013), Strengthening social security - What do Americans want? Google Scholar
National Commission on Social Security (1981), Social security in America's future: Final report of the National Commission on Social Security, March 1981.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005) (2011) (2013), Pensions at a glance (2005) (2011) (2013).Google Scholar
Orszag, P. and Stigliz, J. (1999), ‘Rethinking pension reform: Ten myths about social security systems’, a report presented at the World Bank Conference, ‘New ideas about old age security’, September 14–15.Google Scholar
Palme, J. (1990), Pension rights in welfare capitalism, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Pierson (eds.) (2001), The new politics of the welfare state, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rimlinger, V. (1971), Welfare policy and industrialization in Europe, America and Russia, New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Rubinow, I. (1913), Social insurance; With special reference to American conditions, New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (2012), Obama and America's political future, Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Snee, J. and Ross, M. (1978), ‘Social security amendments of 1977: Legislative history and summary of provisions’, Social Security Bulletin, March 1978.Google Scholar
Social Security Administration (SSA) (2010), ‘Estimated financial effects of four comprehensive proposals to restore social security to sustainable solvency’, Memorandum, January 13.Google Scholar
Social Security Administration (SSA) (2011), Annual statistical supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 2010.Google Scholar
Social Security Administration (SSA) (2016), Income of the aged chartbook 2014.Google Scholar
Tynes, S. (1996), Turning points in social security: From ‘cruel hoax’ to ‘sacred entitlement’, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations (2008), Population prospects: The 2008 revision.Google Scholar
United Nations (2010), Statistics division database.Google Scholar
Weaver, K. (2005), ‘Public pension reform in the United States’, in Bonoli, G. and Shinkawa, T. (eds.), Aging and Pension Reform Around the World, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 230–51.Google Scholar
Bank, World (1994), Averting the old age crisis.Google Scholar
Yoshida, K., Guo, T. and Cheng, L. (2006), ‘The Japanese pension reform of 2004: A new mode of legislative process’, Asian Survey, XLVI, 3, 381–400.Google Scholar

Financial Report and estimation of public pensions

France: Conseil d'orientation des retraites (2012), Retraites: perspectives 2020, 2040 et 2060, France.Google Scholar
Germany: Bundesministerium für arbeit und soziales (2015), Rentenversicherungsbericht 2015, Germany.Google Scholar
Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2014), Review of the 2014 Actuarial Valuation of the Public Pension Plans (Japanese).Google Scholar
Sweden: Pension Agency (2016), Orange Report: Annual Report of the Swedish Pension System 2015.Google Scholar
UK: Government Actuary's Department (2014), Government Actuary's Quinquennial Review of the National Insurance Fund as at April 2010, UK.Google Scholar
US: The Board of Trustees, Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance (OASDI) Funds (2016), The 2016 Annual report of the board of trustees of OASDI Funds.Google Scholar