Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:11:53.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some technical considerations in planning for health†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Peter Draper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Even in Western industrialized countries which have for several decades spent around 5 per cent of their Gross National Product on health care, interest in planning for health is recent. In countries like the United States, with what is sometimes described as a pluralist system, this is scarcely surprising. When the United States is described more bluntly, as it was for example by Walter Reuther, the incompatibility of planning with the general pattern of delivery is clear: ‘What we have, in fact, is a disorganized, disjointed, antiquated, obsolete, non-system of health care.’ But even in the United Kingdom with the framework for planning provided by the National Health Service, observers have been struck by the failure to develop an adequate planning mechanism in twenty years. This view has not been confined to foreign observers nor to British commentators outside the medical establishment.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 149 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted by Hiestand, D. L. in Urban Health Services: the case of New York, Eli Ginzberg and the Conservation of Human Resources Staff, Columbia University. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

2 Bierman, P. et al. in ‘Health Services Research in Great Britain’, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 46, 1968, pp. 9–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3 Brotherston, J. H. F. in Community Medicine: Teaching, Research and Health Care, ed. Lathem, W. and Newberry, A., New York: Meredith Corporation and London: Butter-worths, 1970, pp. 131–2.Google Scholar

4 Engel, A., Perspectives in Health Planning, London, Toronto, New York: The Athlone Press, 1968.Google Scholar

5 Navarro, V., ‘Methodology on Regional Planning of Personal Health Services; a case study; Sweden’, Medical Care, vol. 8, 1970, pp. 386–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6 A Hospital Plan for England and Wales, London: HMSO, Cmnd 1604, 1962.Google Scholar

7 Health and Welfare; the development of Community Care, London: HMSO, Cmnd 1973, 1963.Google Scholar (This collation was subsequently up-dated.)

8 The Administrative Structure of the Medical and Related Services in England and Wales, London: HMSO, 1968.Google Scholar

9 The Future Structure of the National Health Service, London: HMSO, 1970.Google Scholar

10 ‘National Health Service Reorganisation; Consultative Document’, Department of Health and Social Security, London, 1971Google Scholar (not formally published).

11 Apart from a small secretariat, this Unit was essentially staffed by members with spare time rather than having its own full-time specialists. It did however recruit some non-medical experts, including Professor Margot Jefferys, who chaired a working group which produced the constructive report Primary Medical Care, BMA Planning Unit Report No 4, London, BMA House, 1970.Google Scholar

12 Kahn, A. J., Theory and Practice of Social Planning, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969, p. 17.Google Scholar This definition properly distinguishes projections from plans. Health and Welfare Services in Britain in 1975 by Paige, Deborah and Jones, Kit (London and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1966)Google Scholar is an interesting example of the former.

13 Royal Commission on Medical Education 1965–68, London: HMSO, Cmnd. 3569, 1968, para. 133.Google Scholar

14 1968, op. cit. para. 32.

15 1970, op. cit. para. 49.

16 Godber, G., ‘The Public Health, Yesterday and Tomorrow’, The Practitioner, vol. 201, 1968, pp. 162–71.Google Scholar

17 Matthew, G. K., p. 28 in Portfolio for Health: The role and programme of the DHSS in health services research. Problems and Progress in Medical Care, Essays on Current Research, Sixth Series, ed. McLachlan, G., London, New York, Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

18 Doctors in an Integrated Health Service. Report of a Joint Working Party, Scottish Home and Health Department, Edinburgh: HMSO, 1971Google Scholar, para. 107.

19 Hansard, 1 07, vol. 820, no. 170, London: HMSO, 1971, column 608.Google Scholar

20 McLachlan, 1971, op. cit.

21 Ibid., G. K. Matthew, p. 27.

22 Although this committee has been criticized on the grounds of a worsening distribution of general practitioners during its lifetime, it is relevant to compare trends in other countries, some of which would suggest that, within its terms of reference, the committee has been reasonably successful; see for instance Fry, J., Medicine in Three Societies, Aylesbury (Buckinghamshire): MTP, 1969, chapter 11.Google Scholar

23 Op. cit.

24 Forsyth, G., Thomas, R. G. and Jones, S. P. in Problems and Progress in Medical Care. Essays on Current Research, Fourth Series, ed. McLachlan, G., London, New York and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1970, p. 4.Google Scholar

25 Harrington, A. B. and Goodman, H., ‘The way ahead. An experiment in hospital building and medical care’, Health Trends, vol. 1, 1969, pp. 2–6.Google Scholar

26 May, J. J., Health Planning: Its Past and Potential, Health Administration Perspectives No A5, Chicago: Centre for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago, 1967.Google Scholar

27 Kissick, W. L., ‘Planning, Programming and Budgeting in Health’, Medical Care, vol. 5,. 1967, pp. 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Op. cit., chapter 6.

29 See, for instance, Health Services Financing (the report of an advisory panel commissioned in 1967 by the BMA), London: British Medical Association, undated.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., A. T. Peacock and J. Wiseman, p. 254.

31 See, for instance, Pharmaceutical Research; the case for growth in Britain, London: Office of Health Economics, 1967.Google Scholar

32 See, for instance, a review of the after-effects of hypnotics: ‘Sleeping pills: the day after’, Editorial in Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, vol. 9, 1971, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar

33 Mather, H. G. et al. , ‘Acute Myocardial Infarction, Home and Hospital Treatment’, British Medical Journal, vol. 3, 1971, pp. 334–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

34 Gatherer, A. and Reid, J. J. A., Public attitudes and mental health education, Northampton: Northamptonshire County Council, 1963.Google ScholarCartwright, A., Martin, F. M. and Thomson, J. G., ‘Efficacy of an anti-smoking campaign’, Lancet, vol. 1, 1970, pp. 327–9.Google Scholar

35 Crawford, M., Gardner, M. J. and Morris, J. N.. ‘Changes in water hardness and local death-rates’, Lancet, vol. 2, 1971, pp. 327–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

36 Children and their primary schools. A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England), vol. 1, Report, London: HMSO, 1967.Google Scholar

37 Morris, J. N. in The NHS: three views. Fabian research series 287, Draper, P., Kogan, M. and Morris, J. N., London: Fabian Society, 1970.Google Scholar

38 Engel, op. cit.

39 See, for instance, King, A., ‘Failure to control venereal disease’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1, 1970, pp. 451–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

40 Townsend, P. and Wedderburn, D., The Aged in the Welfare State, Occasional Papers on Social Administration, London: Bell, 1965.Google Scholar

41 Kissick, op. cit.

42 Bispham, K., Holland, W. W. and Stringer, J., ‘Planning for Health’, The Hospital, vol. 67, 1971, pp. 82–7.Google Scholar In a subsequent paper, Holland, W. W. and Waller, Jane (‘Population studies in the London Borough of Lambeth’, Community Medicine, vol. 126, 1971, pp. 153–6)Google Scholar have outlined the methods used in some of their population studies and discussed the concept of ‘need’.

43 ‘Sickness Absence. OHE Information Sheet No. 13’, London: Office of Health Economics, 1971.Google Scholar The same institution had estimated the total cost of treatment services for all respiratory disease at £90.6m for 1967–8 in England and Wales (OHE Information Sheet no. 7, 1969). The cost of treating chronic bronchitis would appear to have been about £33m for 1967–8 in England and Wales, on the basis of the OHE estimate in The Costs of Medical Care, OHE, 1964.Google Scholar

44 McLachlan, 1971, op. cit. R. H. L. Cohen, p. 7.

45 Ibid., G. K. Matthew, p. 27.

46 Fanshel, S. and Bush, J. W., ‘A health-status index and its application to health services outcomes’, Operations Research, vol. 18, 1970, pp. 1021–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 McLachlan, op. cit., p. 43.

48 See, for instance, the working paper reporting a ‘Comprehensive Health Planning Seminar’ held in 01 1971 at the Hospital Centre, London (THC 71/113).Google Scholar

49 See footnote 19, p. 13 and ‘Do we spend enough on health care?’, notes prepared by the Hospital Centre and the Office of Health Economics, London, King's Fund Hospital Centre, 1971.Google Scholar The figure given is for health services research, etc. and excludes biochemistry, for example, which has a more international context.

50 Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on Medical Schools, London: HMSO, 1944.Google Scholar

51 Medical Research Council, ‘Streptomycin Treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2, 1948, pp. 769–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar