Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:30:29.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Security or Economic Insecurity? The Concentration of Unemployment (and Research) Within Households*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Sarah Irwin  and
Lydia Morris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The social security structure has been seen as a serious disincentive to the employment of women married to unemployed men. The implied significance of this disincentive is not apparent from verbal accounts, where only a minority of such women cite social security considerations as having any direct relevance in their own labour force experience. Recent research, critical of the social security model, has been conducted with a view to exploring the employment strategies of couples. In such research, economic structure is seen as the context of household employment strategies but not, it appears, as part of their substance; household level processes and ‘external’ economic processes are separated. In this respect, such approaches parallel the social security model. The present paper is based on an analysis of the household circumstances and employment histories of 790 couples in Hartlepool. Our findings suggest that ‘strategies’ regarding household income maintenance are patterned in relation to labour demand and occupational opportunity. This association contributes to the coincidence of spouses' employment status and is indicative of the problems of separating employment demand and labour supply processes, a separation which leads the social policy literature to overstate the significance of social security disincentives to employment.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , July 1993 , pp. 349 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beechey, V. and Perkins, T. (1987), A Matter of Hours: Women, Part-time Work and the Labour Market, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cass, B. (1991), ‘Expanding the concept of social justice: implications for social security’, in Adler, et al. . The Sociology of Social Security', Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, K. (1987) ‘The withdrawal from paid work of the wives of unemployed men: a review of research’, Journal of Social Policy (1987) 16:3, 371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. B. et al. (1991), ‘The relationship between a husband's unemployment and his wife's participation in the labour force’, mimeo.Google Scholar
Dex, S. (1984), Women's Work Histories: An Analysis of the Women and Employment Survey. Department of Employment, Research Paper no. 46.Google Scholar
Dex, S. and Shaw, L. B. (1986), British and American Women at Work. Do Equal Opportunities Policies Matter?, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilnott, A. and Kell, M. (1989), ‘Men's unemployment and women's work’, in Dilnot, and Walker, (eds.), The Economics of Social Security, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. and Ribbens, J. (1991), ‘Meanderings around strategy: a research note on strategic discourse in the lives of women’, Sociology, 25: 3 477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsey, E. (1982), ‘Women's work and theories of class and stratification’, in Giddens, and Held, (eds.), Classes, Power and Conflict. Classical and Contemporary Debates, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (1983), ‘Women and class analysis: in defence of the conventional view’, Sociology, 17:4, 465–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (1984) ‘Women and class analysis: a reply to the replies’, Sociology, 18:4, 491–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. C. et al. (1987), Redundancy and Recession, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmwood, J. (1990) ‘W(h)ither welfare?’ Review article in Work, Employment and Society, 5:2, 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, H. (1984), Women's Participation in Paid Work: Further Analysis of the Women and Employment Survey, Department of Employment RP. 45, London, Department of Employment.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (1984) ‘Lone parent families: politics and economics’, comment in Journal of Social Policy, 18:4, 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, L. and Bell, C. (1985), ‘Marital and family relations in times of male unemployment’, in Roberts, et al. . New Approaches to Economic Life, Manchester, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. and Roberts, C. (1984), Women and Employment: A Lifetime Perspective. The Report of the 1980 DE/OPCS Women and Employment Survey, London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Morris, L. (1990), The Workings of the Household. A U.S.-U.K. Comparison, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Morris, L. (1992), ‘The social segregation of the long-term unemployed’, Sociological Review, 38, 344–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, L. and Irwin, S. (1992), ‘Employment histories and the concept of the underclass’, Sociology, 26:3, 401–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moylan, S. et al. (1984), For Richer, For Poorer? DHSS Cohort Study of Unemployed Men, DHSS Research Report no. 11, London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Pahl, R. (1984), Divisions of Labour, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Siltanen, J. (1986), ‘domestic responsibilities and the structuring of employment’, in Crompton, and Mann, (eds.), Gender and Stratification, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, L. and Temple, B. (1991), ‘Male unemployment, the benefits system and female labour market participation: some Rochdale SCEL Data’, paper presented at the ‘Work, Employment and Society: a Decade of Change’ Conference, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Stanworth, M. (1984), ‘Women and class analysis: a reply to John Goldthorpe’, Sociology, 18:2, 159–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, A. et al. (1985), ‘Gender and earnings: the failure of market explanations’, in Roberts, R. et al. (eds), New Approaches to Economic Life, Manchester, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Weale, A. et al. (1984), Lone Mothers Paid Work and Social Security. A study of the Tapered Earnings Disregard, London, Bedford Square Press/NCVO.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (1982), The DHSS Cohort Study of Unemployed Men. WP1. Men Registered as Unemployed in 1978—A Longitudinal Study, London, DHSS.Google Scholar