Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T19:32:46.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Second Marriage of Justice and Efficiency*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Philippe van Parijs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

No major reform of the welfare state has a chance of going through unless one can make a plausible case as to both its ‘ethical value’ and its ‘economic.value’, that is, that it would have a positive effect in terms of both justice and efficiency. In this essay, this rough conjecture is first presented, and its plausibility probed, on the background of some stylised facts about the rise of modern welfare states in the postwar period. Next, the focus is shifted to the current debate on the introduction of a basic income, a completely unconditional grant paid ex ante to all citizens. It is argued that if basic income is to have a chance of meeting the strong twofold condition stipulated in the conjecture, some major changes are required in the way one usually thinks about justice and efficiency in connection with social policy. But once these changes are made, as they arguably must be, the chance that basic income may be able to meet the challenge is greatly enhanced.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, Anthony B. (1989), Poverty and Social Security, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
Bowles, Sam and Gintis, Herbert (1986). Democracy and Capitalism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Canto, Victor A., Joines, Douglas H. and Lafler, Arthur B. (1983), Foundations of Supply-Side Economics. Theory and Evidence, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cole, George D.H. (1935), Principles of Economic Planning, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Cole, George D.H. (1944), Money: Its Present and Future. Cassel and Co. London.Google Scholar
Dekkers, Jos M. and Nooteboom, Bart. (1988), Het Gedeeltelijk Basisinkomen, de Hervorming van de Jaren Negentig [Partial Basic Income, the Reform of the Nineties], Stichting Maatschappij en Orderneming, The Hague.Google Scholar
Doyle, Len and Gough, Ian (forthcoming), The Theory and Politics of Human Needs.Google Scholar
Laffer, Arthur B. (1984), ‘Government exactions and revenue deficiencies’, in Bartlett, B. and Roth, T.P. (eds), The Supply-Side Solution, Macmillan, London, 120–139.Google Scholar
Lecaillon, Jacques (1970), L'Ineǵalite des Revenus. Le Conflit Entre L'efficacite Economique et la Justice Sociale, Cujas, Paris.Google Scholar
Meade, James E. (1964), Efficiency, Equality and the Ownership of Property, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Meade, James E. (1989), Agathotopia: The Economics of Partnership, Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Miller, Anne (ed.) (1988), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Basic Income, BIEN, Antwerp and BIRG, London.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, Bart. (1986), ‘Basic income as a basis for small business’, International Small Business Journal, 5 (3), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okun, A. (1975), Equality and Efficiency: the Big Tradeoff. Brookings, Washington (DC).Google Scholar
Ouchi, W.G. (1980), ‘Markets, bureaucracies and clans’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Hermione (1989). Instead of the Dole, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Purdy, David (1988), Social Power and the Labour Market. A Radical Approach to Labour Economics, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, Geŕard (1988), ‘Why socialism needs basic income, why basic income needs socialism’, in Miller, Anne (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Basic Income, BIEN. Antwerp, and BIRG, London, 94–105.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. (1989), ‘Vom wirtschaftichen Wert der Sozialpolitik. Die Perspektive der vergleichenden Politikforschung’, in Vobruba, G. (Hrsg), Der wirtschaftliche Wert der Sozialpolitik, Duncker and Humblot, Berlin.forthcoming.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl and Stiglitz, Joseph (1984), ‘Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device’, American Economic Review, 74, 433–444.Google Scholar
Standing, Guy (1986), ‘Meshing labour flexibility with security: an answer to mass unemployment?’, International Labour Review, 125, 87–106.Google Scholar
Standing, Guy (1989), European Unemployment, Insecurity and Flexibility: A Social Dividend Solution, International Labour Office, Geneva, 01 1989.Google Scholar
Thurow, Lester C. (1987). The Zero-Sum Solution. A Radical Blue Print for Economic Growth, Penguin Books (revised edition), Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Townsend, Peter (1974), ‘Poverty as relative deprivation’. in Wedderburn, D. (ed.), Poverty. Inequality and Class Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
van der Veen, Robert J. and Van Parijs, Philippe (1986). ‘A capitalist road to communism’, Theory and Society, 15, 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe (1989). On the Ethical Foundations of Basic Income. Université Catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve): Unité Problématiques Interdisciplinaires. Rapports CMID 31–32.Google Scholar
Van Trier, Walter (1989). Who Framed Social Dividend? A Tale of the Unexpected. Universitaire Faculteiten St Ignatius (Antwerp): SESO. Working paper 89/230.Google Scholar
Vobruba, Georg (ed.) (1989). Der Wirtschaftliche Wert der Sozialpolitik. Duncker and Humblot. Berlin.Google Scholar
Walter, Tony (1989). Basic Income. Freedom from Poverty. Freedom to Work, Marion Boyars, London.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik O. (1986), ‘Why something like socialism is necessary for the transition to something like communism’. Theory and Society, 15, 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRR (1985), Waarborgen voor Zekerheid. Een Nieuw Stelsel van Sociale Zekerheid in HoofdUjnen, TheHague. Staatsuitgeverij. Rapport 26. (English version: Safeguarding Social Security, Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy. The Hague.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar