Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-26T05:23:37.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty Transitions and Trigger Events across EU Groups of Countries: Evidence from EU-SILC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2014

VERONICA POLIN  and
MICHELE RAITANO
VERONICA POLIN
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Verona, Italy email: [email protected]
MICHELE RAITANO*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00161Italy
*
email (corresponding author): [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dynamics of income poverty in European countries have been extensively analysed using the ECHP dataset, run from 1994 to 2001 in the ‘old’ fifteen member states. Using EU-SILC longitudinal data, the purpose of this paper is to update this type of analysis to 2006 by including the ‘new’ EU member states and focusing on poverty mobility. The demographic and economic events associated with households falling into or exiting poverty are analysed through both descriptive analyses and logit regressions. The analysis compares six groups of countries clustered according to welfare regime typologies. The results reveal that most poverty transitions are associated with economic events, but the entry rates after the occurrence of demographic events are also crucial. With respect to poverty entry rates, differences among groups of countries are consistent with their welfare regime typologies, but a less clear ranking among them emerges when considering poverty exit rates and when regressions are estimated while controlling for household characteristics.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 745 - 772
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addabbo, T. and Baldini, M. (2000), ‘Poverty dynamics and social transfers in italy in the early 1990s’, International Journal of Manpower, 21: 3/4, 291–321.Google Scholar
Addison, T., Hulme, D. and Kanbur, R. (2009), ‘Poverty dynamics: measurement and understanding from an interdisciplinary perspective’, in Addison, T., Hulme, D. and Kanbur, R. (eds.), Poverty Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Alber, J., Fahey, T. and Saraceno, C. (2007), ‘Introduction: EU enlargement and quality of life – the context and purpose of the book’, in Alber, J., Fahey, T. and Saraceno, C. (eds.), Handbook of Quality of Life in the Enlarged European Union, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2002), ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state of the art report’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12: 2, 137–58.Google Scholar
Bane, M. J. and Ellwood, D. T. (1986), ‘Slipping into and out of poverty: the dynamics of spells’, Journal of Human Resources, 21: 1, 1–23.Google Scholar
Böheim, R. and Jenkins, S. (2006), ‘A comparison of current and annual measures of income in the British Household Panel Survey’, Journal of Official Statistics, 22: 4, 733–58.Google Scholar
Bukodi, E. and Robert, P. (2007), Occupational Mobility in Europe, Luxembourg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
Callens, M. and Croux, C. (2009), ‘Poverty dynamics in Europe: a multilevel recurrent discrete-time hazard analysis’, International Sociology, 24: 3, 368–96.Google Scholar
Damioli, G. (2010), ‘How and why the dynamics of poverty differ across European countries’, paper presented at the 31st IARIW General Conference, St Gallen, Switzerland, 22–28 August.Google Scholar
Debels, A. and Vandecasteele, L. (2008), ‘The time lag in annual household-based income measures: assessing and correcting the bias’, Review of Income and Wealth, 54: 1, 71–88.Google Scholar
Esping Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping Andersen, G. and Myles, J. (2009), ‘The welfare state and redistribution’, in Salverda, W., Nolan, B. and Smeeding, T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission (2012), Social Developments Employment in Europe 2012, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The southern model of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6: 1, 17–37.Google Scholar
Fouarge, D. and Layte, R. (2005), ‘Welfare regimes and poverty dynamics: the duration and recurrence of poverty spells in Europe’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 3, 407–26.Google Scholar
Gallie, D. and Paugam, S. (2000), Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iacovou, M. and Lynn, P. (2013), ‘Implications of the EU-SILC following rules, and their implementation, for longitudinal analysis’, ISER Working paper no. 17, Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Iacovou, M., Kaminska, O. and Levy, H. (2012), ‘Using EU-SILC data for cross-national analysis: strengths, problems and recommendations’, ISER Working paper no. 3, Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. (2000), ‘Modelling household income dynamics’, Journal of Population Economics, 13: 4, 529–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S. (2011), Changing Fortunes: Income Mobility and Poverty Dynamics in Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. and Rigg, A. (2001), ‘The dynamics of poverty in Britain’, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no. 157.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. and Van Kerm, P. (2011), ‘Patterns of persistent poverty: evidence from EU-SILC’, ISER Working paper no. 30, Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. and Van Kerm, P. (2012), ‘The relationship between EU indicators of persistent and current poverty’, IZA Discussion Paper no. 7071, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layte, R. and Whelan, C. T. (2003), ‘Moving in and out of poverty: the impact of welfare regimes on poverty dynamics in the EU’, European Societies, 5: 2, 167–91.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H. (2011), ‘Comparability of EU-SILC survey and register data: the relationship among employment, earnings and poverty’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21: 1, 37–54.Google Scholar
Mendola, D., Buseta, A. and Aassve, A. (2009), ‘What keeps young adults in permanent poverty? A comparative analysis using ECHP’, Social Science Research, 38: 4, 840–57.Google Scholar
Oxley, H., Dang, T. and Antolìn, P. (2000), ‘Poverty dynamics in six OECD countries’, OECD Economic Studies no. 30.Google Scholar
Riegg, S., McKernan, S. and Ratcliffe, C. (2008), ‘The dynamics of poverty in the United States: a review of data, methods, and findings’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27: 3, 577–605.Google Scholar
Valletta, R. (2006), ‘The ins and outs of poverty in advanced economies: poverty dynamics in Canada, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States’, Review of Income and Wealth, 52: 2, 261–84.Google Scholar
Van Kerm, P. and Pi Alperin, M. (2010), ‘Inequality, growth and mobility: the intertemporal distribution of income in European countries 2003–2007’, Methodologies and Working Papers Series, Catalogue Number KS-RA-11–003-EN-N, Eurostat, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Verma, V., Betti, G. and Gagliardi, F. (2010), ‘An assessment of survey errors in EU-SILC’, Methodologies and Working Papers Series, Catalogue Number KS-RA-10-021-EN-N, Eurostat, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Whelan, C. and Maitre, B. (2010), ‘Comparing poverty indicators in an enlarged European Union’, European Sociological Review, 26: 6, 713–30.Google Scholar
Wolff, P., Montaigne, F. and Rojas González, G. (2010), ‘Investing in statistics: EU-SILC’, in Atkinson, A.B. and Marlier, E. (eds.), Income and Living Conditions in Europe, Luxembourg: Eurostat Statistical Books.Google Scholar