Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:49:26.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Polarising Worlds of Welfare: Political Orientations, Macroeconomic Context, and Support for Redistribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

RAJA NOUREDDINE Open the ORCID record for RAJA NOUREDDINE [Opens in a new window]  and
TIMOTHY B. GRAVELLE Open the ORCID record for TIMOTHY B. GRAVELLE [Opens in a new window]
RAJA NOUREDDINE
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Sciences (2014-2018), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Email: [email protected]
TIMOTHY B. GRAVELLE
Affiliation:
SurveyMonkey, Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public support for the welfare state – and the policies constituting it – has long been a topic of research. Previous research on support for redistribution has tended to focus on how either country-level characteristics (particularly those relating to the macro-economy such as levels of economic development or income inequality) or individual-level political factors (such as left-right political orientation and sociodemographic factors) shape support for redistribution. To date, empirical research has insufficiently tested how macroeconomic context and individual political orientations interact. Research has also obscured whether the effects of macroeconomic context hold cross-sectionally (across country contexts) or longitudinally (within countries over time). Drawing on data from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), this article examines the cross-sectional (between-country) and longitudinal (within-country) interactive relationships involving economic development and income inequality (on one hand) and left–right political orientations (on the other) in shaping preferences for redistribution. Results indicate that there are larger left–right cleavages in attitudes in wealthier countries, more unequal countries, and countries where inequality is increasing. These findings challenge the dominant practice of focusing exclusively on additive effects of individual-level or country-level factors by showing the importance of paying attention to cross-level interactions.

Keywords

Public opinioninequalityredistributionwelfare statemultilevel modelling
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 828 - 851
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberg, T. (2003), Achieving justice: Comparative public opinion on income distribution, London: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. (2012), ‘Support for democracy in cross-national perspective: The detrimental effect of economic inequality’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 30(4): 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. and Curtis, J. (2015), ‘Social Class, Economic Inequality, and the Convergence of Policy Preferences: Evidence from 24 Modern Democracies’, Canadian Review of Sociology 52(3): 266–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. and Yaish, M. (2018), ‘Preferences for the distribution of incomes in modern societies: The enduring influence of social class and economic context’, Canadian Public Policy 44 (2): 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. J. (2000), ‘Economic voting and political context: a comparative perspective’, Electorial Studies 19(2–3): 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, R. (2000), ‘Unequal Societies: Income Distribution and the Social Contract’, American Economic Review 90(1): 96–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blekesaune, M. (2007), ‘Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies’, European Sociological Review 23(3): 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blekesaune, M. (2013), ‘Economic strain and public support for redistribution: A comparative analysis of 28 European countries’, Journal of Social Policy 42(1): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003), ‘Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations’, European Sociological Review 19(5): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, L. D. (1991), ‘Social Responsibility, Individualism, and Redistributive Policies’, Sociological Forum 6(1): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branton, R., Dillingham, G., Dunaway, J. and Miller, B. (2007), ‘Anglo voting on nativist ballot initiatives: The partisan impact of spatial proximity to the U.S.-Mexico border’, Social Science Quarterly 88(3): 882–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaillé, C. and Trump, K.S. (2015), ‘The Two Facets of Social Policy Preferences’, Journal of Politics 77(1): 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallinger, U. (2010), ‘Public support for redistribution: What explains cross-national differences?’, Journal of European Social Policy 20(4): 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, M. L. and Birchfield, V. (2010), ‘Economic Development, Income Inequality, and Preferences for Redistribution’, International Studies Quarterly 54(2): 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, M. (2014), ‘Two Multilevel Modeling Techniques for Analyzing Comparative Longitudinal Survey Datasets’, Political Science Research and Methods 2(1): 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S. and Steenbergen, M. R. (2001), ‘The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare’, American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 658–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S. and Zaller, J. (1992), ‘The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State’, American Journal of Political Science, 36(1): 268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finseraas, H. (2009), ‘Income inequality and demand for redistribution: A multilevel analysis of european public opinion’, Scandinavian Political Studies 32(1): 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forma, P. (2002), ‘Does Economic Hardship Lead to Polarisation of Opinions towards the Welfare State?’, Journal of Social Policy 31(2): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossati, F. (2018), ‘Who Wants Demanding Active Labour Market Policies’ Public Attitudes towards Policies that put Pressure on the Unemployed’, Journal of Social Policy 47(1): 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonthier, F. (2017), ‘Parallel publics? Support for income redistribution in times of economic crisis’, European Journal of Political Research 56(1): 92–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravelle, T. B. (2014), ‘Partisanship, Border Proximity, and Canadian Attitudes toward North American Integration’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(4): 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravelle, T. B. (2016), ‘Party Identification, Contact, Contexts and Public Attitudes Toward Illegal Immigration’, Public Opinion Quarterly 80(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravelle, T. B. (2018), ‘Politics, Time, Space, and Attitudes toward US–Mexico Border Security’, Political Geography 65: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravelle, T. B. (2019), ‘Party identification, local context, and Australian attitudes toward immigration and asylum policy’, Social Science Research 81: 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravelle, T. B. and Lachapelle, E. (2015), ‘Politics, proximity and the pipeline: Mapping public attitudes toward Keystone XL’, Energy Policy 83: 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hox, J. (2010), Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications (2nd ed.), New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. and Inglehart, R. (1995), ‘Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies’, Party Politics 1(1): 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISSP Demographic Methods Group, (2017), ISSP Background Variables Guidelines.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences’, American Political Science Review 95(4): 875–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2015), ‘Information, Inequality, and Mass Polarization: Ideology in Advanced Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 48(13): 1781–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, W. G. (1994), ‘Public Attitudes toward Government Spending’, American Journal of Political Science 38(2): 336–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M. M. (2006), ‘Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: The regime hypothesis revisited’, European Sociological Review 22(2): 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M. M. (2008), ‘Does Left-Right Orientation have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution? Causal Analysis with Cross-sectional Data Using Instrumental Variables’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(3): 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M. M. (2009), ‘United but divided: Welfare regimes and the level and variance in public support for redistribution’, European Sociological Review 25(6): 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M. M. (2013), ‘The effect of macroeconomic and social conditions on the demand for redistribution: A pseudo panel approach’, Journal of European Social Policy 23(2): 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaime-Castillo, A. M. and Sáez-Lozano, J. L. (2016), ‘Preferences for tax schemes in OECD countries, self-interest and ideology’, International Political Science Review 37(1): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J. (2017), ‘Modernising the European Social Paradigm: Social Investments and Social Entrepreneurs’, Journal of Social Policy 46(1): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J. and Hunyady, G. (2003a), ‘Fair Market Ideology: Its Cognitive-Motivational Underpinnings’, Research in Organizational Behavior 25(3): 53–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. and Sulloway, F. J. (2003b), ‘Political conservatism as motivated social cognition’, Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T. and Thompson, E. P. (2000), ‘Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among african americans and european americans’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36(3): 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, L. and Pontusson, J. (2005), ‘Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries’, Perspectives on Politics 3(3): 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelkes, Y. (2016), ‘Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements’, Public Opinion Quarterly 80(1): 392–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linos, K. and West, M. (2003), ‘Self-interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution: Re-addressing the Issue of Cross-national Variation’, European Sociological Review 19(4): 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lübker, M. (2007), ‘Inequality and the demand for redistribution: Are the assumptions of the new growth theory valid?’, Socio-Economic Review 5(1): 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, A. and Richard, S. (1981), ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’, Journal of Political Economy 89(3): 914–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neckerman, K. M. and Torche, F. (2007), ‘Inequality: Causes and Consequences’, Annual Review of Sociology 33(1): 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2011), Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising.Google Scholar
OECD (2019), Social Expenditure Database.Google Scholar
Page, B. I. and Shapiro, R. Y. (1983), ‘Effects of Public Opinion on Policy’, American Political Science Review 77(1): 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993), ‘When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change’, World Politics 45(4): 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001), ‘Coping With Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies’, In Pierson, P. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014), Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. S. (2002), Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2009), ‘Risks and Redistribution’, Comparative Political Studies 42(7): 855–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, M. L. (2017), ‘Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(4): 663–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt-Catran, A. W. (2016), ‘Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: Combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence’, Socio-Economic Review 14(1): 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Catran, A. W., Fairbrother, M. and Andreß, H. J. (2019), ‘Multilevel Models for the Analysis of Comparative Survey Data: Common Problems and Some Solutions’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 71(1): 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R. and Allen, H. M. (1980), ‘Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting’, American Political Science Review 74(3): 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloman, P. (2018), ‘Universal Basic Income in British Politics, 1918–2018: From a ‘Vagabond’s Wage’ to a Global Debate’, Journal of Social Policy 47(3): 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, F. (2016), ‘The Standardized World Income Inequality Database’, Social Science Quarterly 97(5): 1267–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S. N. and Wlezien, C. (2005), ‘Opinion-policy dynamics: Public preferences and public expenditure in the United Kingdom’, British Journal of Political Science 35(4): 665–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, J. and Schram, S. F. (2007), ‘A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback’, The American Political Science Review 101(1): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, L. G. (2015), ‘Income Inequality, Equal Opportunity, and Attitudes About Redistribution’, Social Science Quarterly 96(2): 444–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S. (1997), ‘Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations’, European Sociological Review 13(3): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I. and Shrout, P. E. (2007), ‘Psychological Needs and Values Underlying Left-Right Political Orientation: Cross-National Evidence from Eastern and Western Europe’, Public Opinion Quarterly 71(2): 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trump, K. S. (2018), ‘Income Inequality Influences Perceptions of Legitimate Income Differences’, British Journal of Political Science 48(4): 929–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaalavuo, M. (2013), ‘The Redistributive Impact of ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Social Spending’, Journal of Social Policy 42(3): 513–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vliet, O. and Wang, C. (2015), ‘Social investment and poverty reduction: A comparative analysis across fifteen european countries’, Journal of Social Policy 44: 611–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, H. (2019), ‘The effect of income inequality on political polarization: Evidence from European regions, 2002–2014’, Economics and Politics 31(2): 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, C. (1995), ‘The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending’, American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank, (2018), International Comparison Program Database.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (1st ed.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Noureddine and Gravelle supplementary material

Table A1-A2

Download Noureddine and Gravelle supplementary material(File)
File 57.7 KB