Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:06:56.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new era of social policy integration? Looking at the case of health, social care and housing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2020

VIKKI MCCALL Open the ORCID record for VIKKI MCCALL [Opens in a new window] ,
LOUISE HOYLE ,
SAMINDA GUNASINGHE  and
SIOBHAN O’CONNOR
VIKKI MCCALL
Affiliation:
University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected]
LOUISE HOYLE
Affiliation:
University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected]
SAMINDA GUNASINGHE
Affiliation:
University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected]
SIOBHAN O’CONNOR
Affiliation:
The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Service integration is a global trend aiming to create partnerships, cost-effectiveness and joined-up working across public and third sector services to support an ageing population. However, social policy research suggests that the policy making process behind integration and implementation is complex, contradictory and full of tension. This paper explores social policy integration at the ground-level of services in the health and housing sector within a new integrated model for housing for older people. The paper applies a critical Lipskian approach to show that housing can promote integration for both users and wider stakeholders. Front-line workers were central to service integration, often working to integration principles despite policy changes and uncertainty. Challenges of social policy integration include the gaps between policy and practice and the developing nature of interaction at the ground-level – most notably, the role of technology. Technology and digital health platforms could enhance service user and practitioner interactions at the ground-level. The paper calls for renewed focus on policy processes in relation to service integration and consideration of new forms of service user, practitioner and policy maker interaction.

Keywords

integrationstreet-level bureaucracyhousing practicehealthtechnologydiscretion
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 809 - 827
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alden, S. (2015), ‘Discretion on the frontline: the street level bureaucrat in English statutory homelessness services’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 1, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. and Herker, D. (1977), ‘Boundary spanning roles and organization structure’, Academy of Management Review, 2, 2, 217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALLIANCE (2018), ‘We need to talk about integration’, www.alliance-scotland.org.uk [accessed 20.09 2018].Google Scholar
Audit Scotland (2018), ‘What is integration? A short guide to the integration of health and social care services in Scotland’, http://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/report/what-is-integration-a-short-guide-to-the-integration-of-health-and-social-care-services-in [accessed 20.09 2018].Google Scholar
Boulding, E. (1967), ‘The Boundaries of Social Policy’, Social Work, 12, 1, 3–11.Google Scholar
Buffat, A. (2013), ‘Street-level bureaucracy and E-government’, Public Management Review, 17, 1, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buick, F., O’Flynn, J. and Malbon, E. (2019), ‘Boundary challenges and the work of boundary spanners’, in Dickinson, H., Needham, C., Mangan, C. and Sullivan, H. (eds.), Reimagining the Future Public Service Workforce. Singapore: Springer, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L., Tucker, C. and Domokos, T. (2003), ‘Evaluating the impact of integrated health and social care teams on older people living in the community’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 11, 2, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowe, D. (2012), ‘Catalyst councils: a new future for local public service delivery’, http://www.localis.org.uk/research/catalyst-councils [accessed 16.09.2015].Google Scholar
Delnoij, D., Klazinga, N. and, Glasgow, I. (2002), ‘Integrated care in an international perspective’, International Journal of Integrated Care, 2, 2,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (2000), ‘From the ground up: a report on integrated care design and delivery’, England: Institute of Public Care, Integrated Care network and Community Health partnerships.Google Scholar
Devlin, M., McGee-Lennon, M., O’Donnell, A., Bouamrane, M., Agbakoba, R., O’Connor, S. and Browne, S. (2015), ‘Delivering digital health and well-being at scale: lessons learned during the implementation of the Dallas program in the United Kingdom’, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23, 1, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durose, C. (2011), ‘Revisiting Lipsky: front-line work in UK local governance’, Political Studies, 59, 4, 978–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, T. and Harris, J. (2004), ‘Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion’, The British Journal of Social Work, 34, 6, 871–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, T. (2015), ‘Street-level bureaucracy, management and the corrupted world of service’, European Journal of Social Work, 19, 5, 602–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, C. and Means, R. (2004), ‘Rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic of long-term care – is organizational integration the answer?’, Critical Social Policy, 24, 4, 435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, N., Dixon, A., Anderson, G. and Woodchis, W. (2014), ‘Providing integrated care for older people with complex needs’, London: The Kings Fund.Google Scholar
Goodwin, N. (2016), ‘Understanding integrated care’, International Journal of Integrated Care, 16, 4, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, S., Mercer, S., Palen, T., McKinstry, B. and Hendry, A. (2017), ‘eHealth advances in support of people with complex care needs: case examples from Canada, Scotland and the United States’, Healthcare quarterly, 19, 2, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, L. (2016), ‘Devolution and health in the UK: policy and its lessons since 1998’, British Medical Bulletin, 118, 1, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, S. (2016), ‘Street-level bureaucracy and professionalism in health services’, in Hupe, P. and Hill, M. (eds) Understanding street-level bureaucracy, London: Policy Press, 61–77.Google Scholar
Hoyle, L. (2011), New public management and nursing relationships, Stirling: University of Stirling.Google Scholar
Hoyle, L. (2014), ‘I mean obviously you’re using your discretion: nurses use of discretion in policy implementation’, Social Policy and Society, 13, 2, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ihub (2017), ‘Improvement hub impact report 2016-2017’, https://ihub.scot/media/1282/20170920-ihub-impact-report-agreed-final.pdf [accessed 30.04.2018].Google Scholar
Hulst, M., Graaf, L. and Brink, G. (2012), ‘The work of exemplary practitioners in neighbourhood governance’, Critical Policy Studies, 6, 4, 434–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joint Improvement Team (JIT) (2015), ‘Health and social care integration: guide for housing practitioners’, http://www.jitscotland.org.uk/resource/health-and-social-care-integration-a-guide-for-housing-practitioners-briefing-no-2/ [accessed: 30.04.2018].Google Scholar
Kaehne, A., Birrell, D., Miller, R. and Petch, A. (2017), ‘Bringing integration home: policy on health and social care integration in the four nations of the UK’, Journal of Integrated Care, 25, 2, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keevers, L., Treleaven, L. and Sykes, C. (2008), ‘Partnership and participation: contradictions and tensions in the social policy space’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 43, 3, 459–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. and West, A. (2014), ‘Re-shaping social care services for older people’, Journal of Social Policy, 43, 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1977), ‘Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: implementing special education reform’, Harvard Educational Review, 47, 2, 171–97.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980), Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (2010), Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. and Smith, S. (1990), ‘Nonprofit organisations, government and the welfare state’, Political Science Quarterly, 104, 4, 625–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, J. and Wait, S. (2006), Integrated Care – A Guide for Policymakers. London: International Longevity Centre.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. (2014), ‘Being strategic in partnership: interpreting local knowledge of modern local government’, Local Government Studies, 40, 3, 451–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Moody, S. and Musheno, M. (2000), ‘State agent or citizen agent: two narratives of discretion’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 2, 329–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, V. and Rummery, K. (2017), ‘The theory and practice of welfare partnerships: the case of the cultural sector’, Social Policy and Administration, 51, 1, 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, V., Eadie, J., Lovatt, M., MacIntyre, Z., Phillips, J., Porteus, J., Robertson, J., Rutherford, A., Sixsmith, J., Wallman, J. and Woolrytch, R. (2018), ‘Housing and ageing: Linking strategy to future delivery for Scotland, Wales and England 2030’, Scotland: Scottish Universities Insight Institute.Google Scholar
Meessen, B., Kouanda, S., Musango, L., Richard, F., Ridde, V. and Soucat, A. (2011), ‘Communities of practice: the missing link for knowledge management on implementation issues in low-income countries?’, Tropical Medicine & International Health, 16, 1007–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Needham, C. and Mangan, C. (2014), The 21st century public servant, Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
O’Brien, B.C., Harris, I.B., Beckman, T.J., Reed, D.A. and Cook, D.A. (2014), ‘Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations’, Academic Medicine, 89, 9, 1245–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, S., Hanlon, P., O’Donnell, A., Garcia, S., Glanville, J. and Mair, F. (2016), ‘Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health: a systematic review of qualitative studies’, British Medical Council, Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16,120, 1–15.Google Scholar
Powell, M. and Glendinning, C. (2002), ‘Introduction’, in Glendinning, C., Powell, M. and Rummery, K. (eds.), Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Reed, J., Cook, G., Childs, S. and McCormack, B. (2005), ‘A literature review to explore integrated care for older people’ International Journal of Integrated Care, 5, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C.M. and Ormston, R. (2013), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. and McCall, V. (2020), ‘Facilitating creativity in dementia care: the co-construction of arts-based engagement’, Ageing & Society. 40, 6, 1155–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummery, K. (2002), ‘Towards a theory of welfare partnerships’ in Glendinning, C., Powell, M. and Rummery, K. (eds), Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press, 229–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Government (2014), ‘The Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act 2014’, Edinburgh: The Scottish Government, http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Health/Policy/Adult-Health-SocialCare-Integration/About-the-Bill [accessed 21.10.2016].Google Scholar
Scottish Government (2015), ‘eHealth Strategy 2014–2017’, Edinburgh: The Scottish Government, http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2015/03/5705 [07.12.2016].Google Scholar
Scottish Government (2016), ‘Health and Social Care Delivery Plan’, Edinburgh: The Scottish Government, http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0051/00511950.pdf [accessed 10.09.2018].Google Scholar
Scottish Government (2018), ‘Scotland’s Digital Health and Care Strategy - Enabling, Connecting and Empowering’, Edinburgh: The Scottish Government, http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2018/04/3526/downloads#res-1 [accessed 10.11.2018].Google Scholar
SFHA (2019) ‘TEC in Housing Charter’, https://techousing.co.uk/ [accessed 01.11.19].Google Scholar
Snellen, I. (2002), ‘Electronic governance: implications for citizens, politicians and public servants’, International Review of Administrative Sciences. 68, 2, 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, K. (2016), ‘Developing a competent workforce for integrated health and social care: what Does It Take?’, International Journal of Integrated Care, 16, 4, 9–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, I. and Kelly, J. (2006), ‘Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: re-visiting Lipsky’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19, 7, 629–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. and Craig, J. (2007), ‘Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 19, 6, 349–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virtanen, P., Laitinen, I. and Stenval, J. (2016), ‘Street-level bureaucrats as strategy shapers in social and health service delivery: Empirical evidence from six countries’, International Social Work, 61, 5, 724–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, D. and Waring, T. (2004), ‘Three domains for implementing integrated information systems: redressing the balance between technology, strategic and organizational analysis’, International Journal of Information Management, 24, 4, 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, D. and Waring, T. (2015), Competing or Collaborating Systems: Are we Ready for Health and Social Care Integration?, UK: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2018), ‘Why the UK needs a social policy on ageing’, Journal of Social Policy, 47, 2, 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. (2012), ‘Integrating health and social care from an international perspective’, London: The International Longevity Centre, http://www.ilc-alliance.org/images/uploads/publication-pdfs/Integrating_health_and_social_care_from_an_international_perspective.pdf [accessed 10.09.2018].Google Scholar
Wright, S. (2003), Confronting unemployment in street-level bureaucracies: job centre staff and client perspectives, Stirling: University of Stirling.Google Scholar