Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:34:56.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MPs' Attitudes to Welfare: A New Consensus?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2006

HUGH BOCHEL
Affiliation:
Department of Policy Studies, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS email: [email protected]
ANDREW DEFTY
Affiliation:
Department of Policy Studies, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS email: [email protected]

Abstract

The post-war ‘consensus’ on welfare was based largely in the perceived agreement of leading politicians of Conservative and Labour parties on the role of the mixed economy and the welfare state. However, from the late 1970s economic and demographic pressures and ideological challenges, particularly from the New Right, led to cuts in spending on welfare, increased private involvement and an emphasis on more individualistic and selectivist approaches to provision. Recently some scholars have begun to discuss the emergence of a ‘new liberal consensus’ around welfare provision. Drawing upon interviews with 10 per cent of the House of Commons, this article examines the extent to which a new political consensus upon welfare can be identified. In addition to analysing responses to questions on welfare issues, it considers the extent to which MPs themselves believe there to be some degree of consensus in approaches to welfare. It also considers whether any consensus exists merely in the political language used in relation to welfare issues, or whether there is a more substantive convergence.

Type
Article
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)