Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:07:05.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Differences Among New Claimants of Incapacity Benefit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

PETER A KEMP  and
JACQUELINE DAVIDSON
PETER A KEMP
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford email: [email protected]
JACQUELINE DAVIDSON
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The academic literature on incapacity benefits in Britain is dominated by debates about ‘hidden unemployment’, particularly in relation to working-age men in the industrial and former coalmining areas. Although women account for two-fifths of all claimants, they have been given relatively little attention in the literature on incapacity benefits. This article draws on a representative survey of recent claimants of Incapacity Benefit (IB) in Britain to compare the situation of men and women aged under 60. It shows that there are significant differences in their characteristics and circumstances and in their routes onto this benefit. It is concluded that academic debates in Britain need to take into account the differences between women and men in order to reach a more complete understanding of the role of IB in the post-industrial economy.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 589 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, P., Beatty, C., Fothergill, S., Macmillan, R. and Yeandle, S. (2003), Work to Welfare: How Men Become Detached from the Labour Market, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anyadike-Danes, M. (2007), ‘How well are women doing? Female non-employment across UK regions’, Applied Economics, 39: 1843–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. (1996), ‘Labour market adjustment in areas of chronic industrial decline: the case of the UK coalfields’, Regional Studies, 30: 627–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. (2002), ‘Hidden unemployment among men: a case study’, Regional Studies, 36: 811–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. (2005), ‘The diversion from “unemployment” to “sickness” across British regions and districts’, Regional Studies, 39: 837–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, C., Fothergill, S. and Macmillan, R. (2000), ‘A theory of employment, unemployment and sickness’, Regional Studies, 34: 617–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, C., Fothergill, S., Powell, R., Houston, D. and Sissons, P. (2008), Women and Incapacity Benefits: New Survey Evidence, Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
Berthoud, R. (2003), Multiple Disadvantage in Employment: A Quantitative Analysis, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Bird, C. L. and Rieker, P. P. (2008), Gender and Health: The Effects of Constrained Choices and Social Policies, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, N. (2007), ‘Gender, employment and social class’, Work, Employment and Society, 21: 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, A. and Dawson, T. (1984), Unemployed Women: A Study of Attitudes and Experiences, Research Paper No. 47, London: Department of Employment.Google Scholar
Crompton, R. (2006), Employment and the Family, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. and Kemp, P. A. (2008), ‘Sickness benefits in a polarised labour market’, Benefits, 16: 2, 225–33.Google Scholar
Deacon, S., Fitzpatrick, P., Howard, M. and Land, H. (2007), Women and Incapacity Benefits, London: Women's Budget Group and Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2005), Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Quarterly Summary Statistics: February 2005, London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Doyal, L. (2001), ‘Sex, gender and health: the need for a new approach’, British Medical Journal, 323: 1061–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgell, S. (2006), The Sociology of Work, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Einerhand, M. and Van Der Stelt, H. (2005), ‘Growing disability rates – the gender issue: the Dutch case in an international perspective’, International Social Security Review, 58: 1, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faggio, G. and Nickell, S. (2003), ‘The rise of inactivity among adult men’, in Dickens, R., Gregg, P. and Wadsworth, J. (eds.), The Labour Market Under New Labour, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2007), ‘Social security, employment and Incapacity Benefit: critical reflections on A New Deal for Welfare’, Disability and Society, 22: 733–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, J. (2007), Ends and Means: The Future Roles of Social Housing in England, CASE report 34, London: Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion.Google Scholar
Kemp, P. A. (2006), ‘Comparing trends in disability benefit receipt’, in Kemp, P. A., Sunden, A. and Bakker, B. (eds.), Sick Societies? Trends in Disability Benefits in Post-industrial Welfare States, Geneva: International Social Security Association.Google Scholar
Kemp, P. A. and Davidson, J. (2008), Routes onto Incapacity Benefits: Findings from a Survey of Recent Claimants, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 469, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Kemp, P. A. and Thornton, P. (2006), ‘Disguised unemployment? The growth of Incapacity Benefit claims in Great Britain’, in Kemp, P. A., Sunden, A. and Bakker, B. (eds.), Sick Societies? Trends in Disability Benefits in Post-industrial Welfare States, Geneva: International Social Security Association.Google Scholar
McGovern, P., Smeaton, D. and Hill, S. (2004), ‘Bad jobs in Britain: non-standard employment and job quality’, Work and Occupations, 32: 2, 225–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molho, I. (1991), ‘Going onto invalidity benefit: a study for women (1977/78–1983/84)’, Applied Economics, 23: 1569–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrieff, J. and Pomerleau, J. (2002), ‘Trends in sickness benefits in Great Britain and the contribution of mental disorders’, Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22: 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, S. (2003), Poverty and Worklessness in Britain, CEP Discussion Paper, London: Centre for Economic Performance.Google Scholar
OECD (2003), Transforming Disability into Ability: Policies to Promote Work and Income Security for Disabled People, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. (2003), ‘Gender and labour market performance in the recovery’, in Dickens, R., Gregg, P. and Wadsworth, J. (eds.), The Labour Market under New Labour, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, R. and Davidson, J. (2006), Routes onto Incapacity Benefits: Findings from Qualitative Research, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 350, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2006), A New Deal for Welfare: Empowering People to Work, Cm 6859, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Sen, G., Piroska, O. and George, A. (2007), ‘Unequal, unfair, ineffective and inefficient – gender inequity in health: why it exists and how we can change it’, Final report to the World Health Organisation Commission on the Social Determinants of Health.Google Scholar
Sunley, P., Martin, R. and Nativel, C. (2006), Putting Workfare in Place: Local Labour Markets and the New Deal, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. B. (1999), ‘Low pay in Britain’, in Gregg, P. and Wadsworth, J. (eds.), The State of Working Britain, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. and Howard, M. (2000), The Making of a Welfare Class?, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar