Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T19:11:07.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Distribution of Social Security Transfers in the UK*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Brian Nolan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The distributional impact of different transfer programmes is one of the basic criteria on which decisions such as those on resource allocation may be based. This paper examines the spread over the UK size distribution of different transfers, using data from the Family Expenditure Survey (FES). In addition to analysing the distribution of current transfer receipts by actual current income, estimates are developed which allow the spread of annual receipts by annual income to be examined. The results show that the short-term unemployment and sickness benefits have a considerably greater degree of concentration towards the bottom of the distribution than some previous studies have indicated. This is particularly true for current income, but even for annual receipts and income the degree of concentration is greater than might have been expected. The impression that these benefits have a very low redistributive effect may have had a major influence on recent policy decisions. This is shown to be particularly misleading in the case of unemployment benefit.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 185 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, A.B. (1975), The Economics of Inequality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Beckerman, W. (1979a), ‘The impact of income maintenance payments on poverty in Britain, 1975’, Economic Journal, 89 (06), 261–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckerman, W. (1979b), Poverty and the Impact of Income Maintenance Programmes, International Labor Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Dilnot, A.W., Kay, J.A. and Morris, C.N. (1984), The Reform of Social Security, Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office (1982), ‘The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 1980’, Economic Trends, 339 (01), 97–126.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office (1983), ‘The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 1982’, Economic Trends, 361 (11), 82–116.Google Scholar
Cmnd 7175 (1976), Report No. 6, Lower Incomes, Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
McClements, L.D. (1977), ‘Equivalence scales for children’, Journal of Public Economics, 8:2, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolan, B. (1983), Estimation of Annual Income from the Family Expenditure Survey, Research Note 6, SSRC Programme on Taxation, Incentives and the Distribution of Income, 06.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. (1984a), Income Distribution and the Macroeconomy, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, London University, 07.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. (1984b), Unemployment and the Size Distribution of Income, Paper read to the European Meeting of the Econometrics Society, Madrid, 09.Google Scholar
O'Higgins, M. (1985), ‘Inequality, redistribution and recession: The British experience 1976–82’,. Journal of Social Policy, 14:3, 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1982), The Distribution and Redistribution of Incomes, Occasional Papers on Social Administration No. 67, Bedford Square Press, London.Google Scholar
Van Slooten, R. (1975), Distributional Effects of Public Expenditure: Social Security and Health, mimeo, DHSS, London.Google Scholar