Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:12:05.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Could Personalisation Reduce Re-offending? Reflections on Potential Lessons from British Social Care Reform for the British Criminal Justice System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2013

ALEX FOX ,
CHRIS FOX  and
CAROLINE MARSH
ALEX FOX
Affiliation:
Chief Executive of SharedLivesPlus email: [email protected]
CHRIS FOX
Affiliation:
Professor of Evaluation, Manchester Metropolitan University email: [email protected]
CAROLINE MARSH
Affiliation:
Director, Caroline Marsh Management Solutions Ltd email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rising prison numbers and high rates of re-offending illustrate the need for criminal justice reform. In the social care sector, the ‘personalisation revolution’ has resulted in the near eradication of long-term, institutional care for the majority of people with disabilities and many frail older people, increasing satisfaction. This paper examines what this has entailed and considers the case for introducing personalisation in the criminal justice system. It concludes that criminal justice reformers can learn from the social care experience and suggests how personalisation might fit within the current criminal justice reform agenda. However, introducing personalisation will pose significant challenges, perhaps the biggest being the need to change criminal justice culture.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 721 - 741
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. (2008), ‘Justice reinvestment: making sense of the costs of imprisonment’, Criminal Justice Matters, 71: 1, 41–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D. A. and Bonta, J. (2006), The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, Newark, NJ: Lexis/Nexis.Google Scholar
Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (2011), Personal Budgets Survey, London: ADASS.Google Scholar
Association of Supported Living (ASL) (2011), There Is an Alternative, London: ASL.Google Scholar
Blumstein, A. and Cohen, J. (1987), ‘Characterizing criminal careers’, Science, 237: 985–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broad, R. (2012), Local Area Coordination, London: Inclusive Neighbourhoods.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (2011), Modernising Commissioning: Increasing the Role of Charities, Social Enterprises, Mutuals and Cooperatives in Public Service Delivery, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Care Quality Commission (2010), State of Care Report 2009, London: QCC.Google Scholar
Care Quality Commission (2011), The State of Health Care and Adult Social Care in England 2009/10, London: QCC.Google Scholar
Daly, G. and Woolham, J. (2010), Do Personal Budgets Lead to Personalisation? York: UK Social Policy Association.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1989), Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond, Cm. 849, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2007), Putting People First: A Shared Vision and Commitment to the Transformation of Adult Social Care, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2008), Evaluation of Individual Budgets Pilots Programme, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2009), Contracting for Personalised Outcomes: Learning from Emerging Practice, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2012), Caring for Our Future: Reforming Care and Support, Cm 8378, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Dodge, C. R. (1979), A World without Prisons: Alternatives to Incarceration throughout the World, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Eide, E. (1999), ‘The economics of criminal behaviour’, in Bouckaert, B. and De Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, V: The Economics of Crime and Litigation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Emerson, E., Hatton, C., Robertson, J., Roberts, H., Baines, S. and Glover, G. (2010), People with Learning Disabilities in England 2010, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
English Heritage (undated), History of Disability, www.english-heritage.org.uk/discover/people-and-places/disability-history/ (accessed 14 January 2013).Google Scholar
Farrall, S. (2004), ‘Social capital and offender reintegration: making probation desistance focussed’, in Maruna, S. and Immarigeon, R. (eds.), After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (2012), Personalisation: Lessons from Social Care, London: RSA.Google Scholar
Fox, C., Albertson, K. and Wong, K. (2013), Justice Reinvestment: Can it Deliver More for Less?, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. and Albertson, A. (2011), ‘Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: new challenges for the concept of evidence-based policy?’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11: 5, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R. (1988), Community Care: Agenda for Action, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
HM Government (1990), The National Health Service and Community Care Act, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
HM Government (2010), The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Holloway, S., Neville, S. and Watts, R. (2011), Longitudinal Study of Cash Payments for Adult Social Care in Essex, London: OPM and ECDP.Google Scholar
Howard, P., Francis, B., Soothill, K. and Humphreys, L. (2009), OGRS 3: The Revised Offender Group Reconviction Scale, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
In Control (2011), The National Personal Budget Survey, Think Local, Act Personal, Birmingham: In Control.Google Scholar
Justice Committee (2009), Cutting Crime: The Case for Justice Reinvestment, London: The Stationary Office Limited.Google Scholar
La Vigne, N. G., Neusteter, R. S., Lachman, P., Dwyer, A. and Nadeau, C. A. (2010), Justice Reinvestment at the Local Level, Planning and Implementation Guide, Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.Google Scholar
Levitt, S. D. (1996), ‘The effect of prison population size on crime rates: evidence from prison overcrowding litigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111: 319–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liedka, R. V., Piehl, A. M. and Useem, B. (2006), ‘The crime‐control effect of incarceration: does scale matter?’, Criminology and Public Policy, 5: 2, 245–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, M. W. and Cullen, F. T. (2007), ‘The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3: 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, M. and Raynor, P. (2006), ‘How the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime: or does it?’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6: 1, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester Metropolitan University (2012), ‘Evaluation of the effectiveness of a micro-enterprise support project’, Unpublished early findings, Manchester Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
Maruna, S. (2001), Making Good, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.Google Scholar
Maruna, S. (2006), ‘Who owns resettlement? Towards restorative re-integration’, British Journal of Community Justice, 4: 2, 23–33.Google Scholar
Maruna, S. (2010), ‘The desistance paradigm in correctional practice: from programmes to lives’, in McNeill, F., Raynor, P. and Trotter, C. (eds.), Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
Marvell, T. and Moody, C. (1994), ‘Prison population and crime reduction’, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10: 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, J. (1995), The Careless Society: Community and Its Counterfeits, Chicago: Basic Books.Google Scholar
McNeill, F. (2006), ‘A desistance paradigm for offender management’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6: 1, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, F. (2009), Towards Effective Practice in Offender Supervision, Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.Google Scholar
McNeill, F. and Weaver, B. (2010), Changing Lives? Desistance Research and Offender Management, Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2009), Story of the Prison Population 1995–2009 England and Wales, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2010), Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2011a), Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin January to December 2009, England and Wales, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2011b), National Standards for the Management of Offenders in England and Wales, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2012a), Population and Capacity Briefing for Friday 22/06/2012, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2012b), Punishment and Reform: Effective Probation Services, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2013), Transforming Rehabilitation: A Revolution in the Way We Manage Offenders, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Mitford, J. (1973), Kind and Usual Punishment: The Prison Business, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Morris, D. and Gilchrist, A. (2011), Communities Connected: Inclusion, Participation and Common Purpose, London: RSA.Google Scholar
Mottram, P. G. (2007), HMP Liverpool, Styal and Hindley Study Report, Liverpool: University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R. and Sanders, B. (2007), Social Innovation: What It Is, Why It Matters and How It Can Be Accelerated, Oxford: Said Business School.Google Scholar
NAAPS, Centre for Inclusive Futures, Community Catalysts, New Economics Foundation, KeyRing, CSV and John Gillespie (2011), Creating Stronger and More Inclusive Communities which Value Everyone's Right to Contribute, www.csv.org.uk/sites/default/files/Creating-stronger-and-more-inclusive-communities.pdf (accessed 29 May 2012).Google Scholar
National Audit Office (2010), Managing Offenders on Short-Term Custodial Sentences, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
National Offender Management Service (2005), The NOMS Offender Management Model, London: NOMS.Google Scholar
National Offender Management Service (2010), What Works in Offender Rehabilitation? London: NOMS.Google Scholar
Prabhakar, M., Thom, G. and Johnson, R. (2011), Individual Budgets for Families with Disabled Children – Final Evaluation Report, London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
Princess Royal Trust for Carers (2009), Putting People First without Putting Carers Second, London: PRTC.Google Scholar
Prison Reform Trust (2012), Bromley Prison Briefing, London: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1977), Decarceration: Community Treatment and the Deviant – A Radical View, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Shared Lives Plus (2011), Map for Micro-Enterprise in Social Care, Liverpool: Shared Lives Plus.Google Scholar
Shared Lives Plus and KeyRing (2012), Closing the Winterbournes, London: SLP/KR.Google Scholar
Shepherd, J. (2006), ‘The imprisonment puzzle: understanding how prison growth affects crime’, Criminology and Public Policy, 5: 2, 285–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, N., Meltzer, H. and Gatward, R. (1998), Psychiatric Morbidity among Prisoners in England and Wales, London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
Skolnick, A. (2012), ‘Runaway prison costs trash state budgets’, The Fiscal Times, 9 February 2011.Google Scholar
Sommer, R. (1976), The End of Imprisonment, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Think Local, Act Personal (2011), Taking Stock, Moving Forwards, London: TLAP.Google Scholar
Tucker, S. and Cadora, E. (2003), ‘Justice reinvestment: to invest in public safety by reallocating justice dollars to refinance education, housing, healthcare, and jobs’, Monograph, Ideas for an Open Society, 3.Google Scholar
Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976), Fundamental Principles of Disability, London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.Google Scholar
Ward, T. and Maruna, S. (2007), Rehabilitation: Beyond the Risk Paradigm, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, J. (2011), Community Fund Holding: A Model for Local Choice and Control, Wythall: In Control.Google Scholar
Weaver, B. (2011), ‘Co-producing community justice: the transformative potential of personalisation for penal sanctions’, British Journal of Social Work, 41: 6, 1038–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, R. and Witte, A. (2000), ‘Crime, prison, and female labor supply’, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16: 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar