Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T18:21:32.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing Family Policy in Britain, France and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Linda Hantrais
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a context where the employment model of welfare is dominant, family policy has remained an area of limited and indirect competence for the European Community. Comparative analysis of Britain, France and the Federal Republic of Germany as examples of EC member states with different socio-cultural traditions and policy styles shows the limitations of theories about universalism, convergence and harmonisation of family structures and policies. Compared with Britain and Germany, the family policy making style in France is more explicit, visible, coherent and legitimate. Its objectives are overtly pro-natalist and it would seem to have had a stronger direct socio-economic impact.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 135 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamson, P. (1992), ‘Welfare Pluralism: Towards a New Consensus for a European Social Policy?’, in Hantrais, L., Mangen, S. and O'Brien, M. (eds.), ‘The Mixed Economy of Welfare’, Cross-National Research Papers, 2: 6, 5–22.Google Scholar
Bäcker, G., Bispinck, R., Hofemann, K. and Naegele, G. (1989), Sozialpolitik und soziale Lage in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vol. 2, Gesundheit – Familie – Alter – Soziale Dienste, Bund-Verlag, Cologne.Google Scholar
Barbier, J.-C. (1990), ‘Pour bien comparer les politlques familiales en Europe. Quelques problèmes de méthode’, Revue française des affaires sociales, 44: 3, 153–71.Google Scholar
Barrère-Maurisson, M.-A. and Marchand, O. (1990), ‘Structures familiales et marchés du travail dans les pays développés: une nette opposition entre le Nord et le Sud’, Economie et statistique, no. 235, 09, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghman, J. (1990), ‘The Implications of 1992 for Social Policy: a Selective Critique of Social Insurance’, in Mangen, S., Hantrais, L. and O'Brien, M. (eds.). ‘The Implications of 1992 for Social Insurance’, Cross-National Research Papers, 2: 1, 9–17.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1989), Communication from the Commission on Family Policies, COM(89) 363 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 8 08.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (1988), The European Social Charter and its Protocol Council of Europe, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Debizet, J. (1990), ‘La Scolarité après 16 ans’, Données sociales, INSEE, Paris, 330–5.Google Scholar
Dumon, W. with Bartiaux, F. and Nuelant, T. (1991), National Family Policies in EC-Countries in 1990, V/2293/91-EN, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Polity Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
European Institute of Social Security (1988), The Role of Social Security in the Context of the Completion of the Internal Market by 1992: Report for the Commission of the European Communities, V/1653/EN-88, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
Eurostat, (1990), Demographic Statistics, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Eurostat, (1991a), Labour Force Survey: Results 1989, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Eurostat, (1991b), A Social Portrait of Europe, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Fagnani, J. (1992), ‘Les Françaises font-elles des prouesses? Fécondité et travail professionnel et politiques familiales en France et en Allemagne de l‘Ouest’, CNAF, Recherches et prévisions, no. 28, 09. 23–36.Google Scholar
Fournier, J., Questiaux, N. and Delarue, J.-M. (1989), Traité d.u social: situations, luttes, politiques, institutions, 5th edition, Dalloz, Paris.Google Scholar
Hantrais, L. (1990), Managing Professional and Family Life: a Comparative Study of British and French Women, Dartmouth, Aldershot/Vermont.Google Scholar
Hantrais, L. (1992), ‘La Fécondité en France et au Royaume-Uni: les effets possibles de la politique familiale’. Population, 47: 4, 987–1016.Google Scholar
Hantrais, L. (1993), ‘Women, Work and Welfare in France’, in Lewis, J. (ed.), Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, 116–37.Google Scholar
Haskey, J. and Kiernan, K. (1989), ‘Cohabitation in Great Britain– Characteristics and Estimated Numbers of Cohabiting Partners’, Population Trends, 58, 23–32.Google Scholar
Haut Conseil de la Population et de la Familie (1987), Vie professionnelle et vie familiale, de nouveaux équilibres á construire, La Documentation Française, Paris.Google Scholar
INRA European Coordination Office (1990), ‘European Public Opinion on the Family and the Desire for Children’, Eurobarometer 32, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
Kamerman, S. B. and Kahn, A. K. (eds.) (1978), Family Policy: Government and Families in Fourteen Countries, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kempeneers, M. and Lelièvre, E. (1991), ‘Family and Employment within the Twelve’, Eurobarometer 34, C/383/92-EN, Commission of the European Communities and Eurostat, Brussels.Google Scholar
Lampert, H. (1991), ‘Familienpolitik in Deutschland. Ein Beitrag zu einer familienpolitischen Konzeption im vereinten Deutschland’, in Kleinhenz, G. (ed.), Sozialpolitik im vereinten Deutschland, vol. 1, Duncker and Humblot, Berlin, 115–39.Google Scholar
Léridon, H. and Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1988), ‘Les Nouveaux Couples: nombre, caractéristiques et attitudes’, Population, 43: 2, 331–74.Google Scholar
Meier, U. (1991), ‘La Politique sociale et familiale en Allemagne. Les évolutions depuis la réunification‘, Revue française des affaires sociales, 45: 3, 95–112.Google Scholar
Ministerium für Arbeit, Gesundheit, Familie und Sozialordnung (ed.) (1986), Gesamtkonzept Familienpolitik: für eine familienfreundliche Gesellschaft, Ministerium für Arbeit, Gesundheit, Familie und Sozialordnung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Monnier, A. and de Guibert-Lantoine, C. (1991), ‘La Conjoncture démographique: l'Europe et les pays développés d'Outre-Mer’, Population, 46: 4, 941–61.Google Scholar
Moss, P. (1990), ‘Childcare in the European Communities 1985–1990’, Women of Europe Supplements, no. 31, 08.Google Scholar
Neubauer, E. (1992), ‘Familienpolitische Ansätze zum Ausgleich der Aufwendungen für Kinder’, in GEFAM, Zwölf Wege der Familienpolitik in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Eigenständige Systeme und vergleichbare Qualitäten? Vorläufiger Bericht zum Colloquium, Bonn, chapter 7.Google Scholar
OECD (1987), Labour Force Statistics, 1965–85, OCDE, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (1990), Labour Force Statistics, 1968–88, OCDE, Paris.Google Scholar
Ribes, B. (1990), Families and Policies: Evolutions and Trends in 1988–89, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
Roll, J. (1986), ‘Family Trends and Social Reform’, Family Policy Studies Centre Briefing Paper, London.Google Scholar
Roll, J. (1992), Lone Parent Families in the European Community: A Report to the European Commission, European Family and Social Policy Unit, London.Google Scholar
Schultheis, F. (1990), ‘Families d'Europe sans frontières: un enjeu social par dessus le marché’, Conference Proceedings, Families d'Europe sans frontières, 4–5 December 1989, IDEF, Paris, 73–80.Google Scholar
Schultheis, F. (1991), ‘La Familie, le marché et l'état providence’, in de Singly, F. and Schultheis, F. (eds.), Affaires de familie, affaires d'Etat, Editions de l'Est, Jarville la Magrange, 33–42.Google Scholar
Schultheis, F. (1992), ‘Inerties structurelles et ambivalences idéologiques: la protection sociale allemande face aux nouveaux ‘risques familiaux’, Recherche sociale, 122: 2, 04–06 144–57.Google Scholar
de Singly, F. and Schultheis, F. (eds.) (1991), Affaires de familie, affaires d'Etat, Editions de l'Est, Jarville la Magrange.Google Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt (ed.) (1987), Datenreport 1987: Zahlen und Fakten über die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bundeszentrale f¨r politische Bildung, Bonn.Google Scholar
Steck, P. (1985), ‘Les Prestations familiales de 1946 á 1985: ruptures ou Constances?’, Revue française des affaires sociales, 39 (Special issue), ‘Quarante ans de Sécurité Sociale’, 07–09, 61–98.Google Scholar
Tabah, L. and Maugué, C. (1989), Démographie et politique familiale en Europe, La Documentation Française, Paris.Google Scholar