Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:48:21.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Child Support Grants in South Africa: A Pathway to Women's Empowerment and Child Well-being?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2015

LEILA PATEL ,
TRUDIE KNIJN  and
FRITS VAN WEL
LEILA PATEL
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Development in Africa, University of Johannesburg, South Africa email: [email protected]
TRUDIE KNIJN
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Policy and Intervention Studies, Utrecht University, The Netherlands email: [email protected]
FRITS VAN WEL
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Policy and Intervention Studies, Utrecht University, The Netherlands email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the growth of cash transfers to reduce poverty, promote child and family well-being and women's empowerment, the gender dynamics and impact of social protection remains poorly understood. We hypothesise that poor female care-givers receiving a cash transfer for their children are better able to contribute to the material and social well-being of their children than female care-givers who do not receive a cash transfer. This paper reports results of a household survey in one of the poorest wards in Johannesburg, South Africa. Structural equation modelling is used to analyse the data. We found that cash transfers increase women's individual income, which is in turn positively associated with increased financial independence, decision-making power over financial resources and decisions about children's well-being. Beneficiaries were more actively engaged in care activities with their children. There are two implications for the insertion of gender and care into social protection policies. First that it is not necessary to attach behavioural change conditions to social protection policies in order to stimulate female care-givers to be more engaged in developmental activities with their children. Second, there is no risk of promoting a maternalistic model of care or ‘maternalism’ in the South African context as the transfer contributes to both women's individual incomes and their financial decision-making power.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 377 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adato, M., de la Brière, B., Mindek, D. and Quisumbing, A. (2000), The Impact of PROGRESA on Women's Status and Intrahousehold Relations, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
Aguero, J. M., Carter, M. R. and Woolard, I. (2006), ‘The impact of unconditional cash transfers on nutrition: the South African Child Support Grant’, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Budlender, D. and Lund, F. (2011) ‘South Africa: a legacy of family disruption’, Development and Change, 42: 4, 925–46.Google Scholar
Case, A., Hosegood, V. and Lund, F. (2005), ‘The reach and impact of child support grants: evidence from KwaZulu-Natal’, Development Southern Africa, 22: 4, 467–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, J., Swindale, A. and Bilinsky, P. (2006), ‘Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: indicator guide’, Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
de Wet, T., Patel, L., Korth, M. and Forrester, C. (2008), Johannesburg Poverty and Livelihood Study, Johannesburg: Centre for Social Development in Africa, University Google Scholar
Delany, A., Ismail, Z., Graham, L. and Ramkisson, Y. (2008), Review of the Child Support Grant: Uses, Implementation and Obstacles, Johannesburg: Department of Social Development, CASE, SASSA and Unicef.Google Scholar
DSD, SASSA and UNICEF (2012), The South African Child Support Grant Impact Assessment: Evidence from a Survey of Children, Adolescents and Their Households, Pretoria, South Africa: UNICEF.Google Scholar
Hall, K. and Wright, G. (2010), ‘A Profile of Children Living in South Africa in 2008’, Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 34: 3, 45–68.Google Scholar
Holmes, R., Jones, N., Mannan, F., Vargas, R., Tafere, Y. and Woldehanna, T. (2011), ‘Addressing gendered risk and vulnerabilities through social protection: examples of good practice from Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Peru’, Gender and Development, 19: 2, 255–70.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R. H. (ed.) (1995), Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues and Application, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Kabeer, N. (1999), ‘Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment’, Development and Change, 30: 3, 435–64.Google Scholar
Kukrety, N. and Mohanty, S. (2011), ‘Putting gender equality at the heart of social protection: lessons from Oxfam GB's experience with safety net programming’, Gender and Development, 19: 2, 271–81.Google Scholar
Künemund, H. and Rein, M. (1999), ‘There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out’, Ageing and Society, 19: 93–121.Google Scholar
Lund, F. (2006), ‘Gender and social security in South Africa’, in Padayachee, V. (ed.), The Development Decade? Economic and Social Change in South Africa, 1994–2004, Pretoria, South Africa: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Lund, F. (2011), ‘A step in the wrong direction: linking the South Africa Child Support Grant to school attendance’, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19: 1, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molyneux, M. (2007), ‘Two cheers for CCTs’, IDS Bulletin, 38: 3, 69–74.Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. (2008), Conditional Cash Transfers: A ‘Pathway to Women's Empowerment’?, Pathways to Women's Empowerment Working Paper 5, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. and Thomson, M. (2011), ‘Cash transfers, gender equity and women's empoweremnt in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia’, Gender and Development, 19: 2, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Treasury (2014), ‘Social security and welfare spending in South Africa’, unpublished paper, National Treasury, Republic of South Africa, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Neves, D., Samson, M., van Niekerk, I., Hlatshwayo, S. and du Toit, A. (2009), The Use and Effectiveness of Social Grants in South Africa, Cape Town: FinMark Trust, Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, and Economic Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
Patel, L. (2011). ‘Child Support Grants in South Africa’, Sharing Innovative Experiences: Successful Social Floor Experiences, New York: International Labor Organisation/United Nations Development Programme, pp. 361–384.Google Scholar
Patel, L. (2013), ‘Social protection in South Africa: history, goals and strategies’, in Midgley, J. and Piachaud, D., Social Protection, Economic Growth and Social Change: Goals, Issues and Trajectories in China, India, Brazil and South Africa, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers, pp. 201–216.Google Scholar
Patel, L., Hochfeld, T., Moodley, J. and Mutwali, R. (2012), The Gender Dynamics and Impact of the Child Support Grant in Doornkop, Soweto, Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Posel, D. and Rogan, M. (2012), ‘Gendered trends in poverty in the post-apartheid period, 1997–2006’, Development Southern Africa, 29: 1, 96–113.Google Scholar
Republic of South Africa (2009), ‘Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 as amended: Regulations, Government Gazette, No. R.1252, 31 December 2009, pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
Sabates-Wheeler, R. and Roelen, K. (2011) ‘Transformative social protection programming for children and their carers: a gender perspective’, Journal for Gender and Development, 19: 2, 179–94.Google Scholar
Samson, M., Heinrich, C., Williams, M. J., Kaniki, S., Muzondo, T., Mac Quene, K. and van Niekerk, I. (2008), Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of the Child Support Grant, South Africa: Department of Social Development, South African Social Security Agency and United Nations Children's Fund.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1985), Commodities and Capabilities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
South African Human Rights Commission, and UNICEF (2011), South Africa's Children – A Review of Equity and Child Rights, http://www.unicef.org/southafrica (accessed 18 October 2014).Google Scholar
Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) (2004), Census 2001, Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
UNDP and ILO (2011), Sharing Innovative Experiences: Successful Social Protection Floor Experiences, New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Vorster, J. and de Waal, L. (2008), ‘Beneficiaries of the Child Support Grant: findings from a national survey’, The Social Work Practitioner-Researcher, 20: 2, 233–48.Google Scholar