Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:14:15.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Econometric Analysis of the Growth in the Numbers Claiming Invalidity Benefit: An Overview*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Abstract

Invalidity benefit is the main form of state-provided long term sickness benefit in Great Britain, and the number of claims for the benefit have increased beyond all expectations since its introduction in 1971. This paper summarises the results of a project on the issue, analysing data over the period 1975/6 and 1983/4. The numbers claiming the benefit are viewed in terms of the outcome of the inflow and the duration of claims. The determination of both inflows and durations were found to be dominated by demographic effects in terms of age and health, but other factors were also found to be relevant at the margin. These included local housing and labour market conditions, as well as pay prior to entry and rates of benefit. Inflows were found to fall over the period, however, as a result of changes in the population ‘at risk’ of entry. The main cause of growth in the number of claims lay in increased durations, in relation to which it was observed that the percentage of new claimants with characteristics associated with longer claim durations increased over the period.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butler, R. and Worrall, J. (1985), ‘Work injury compensation and the duration of non-work spells’, Economic Journal, 95, 714–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greedy, J. and Disney, R. (1985), Social Insurance in Transition: An Economic Analysis, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fenn, P. (1981), ‘Sickness duration, residual disability and income replacement: an empirical analysis’, Economic Journal, 91, 158–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, C. (1977), ‘A labour supply function for married women in Great Britain’, Economica, 26, 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, C. (1979), ‘Male labour force participation in Great Britain’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 26, 275–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. and Molho, I. (1985), ‘Women in the labour markets of the London region: a model of dependence and constraint’, Urban Studies, 22, 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, P. (1990), ‘The provision, role and economic impact of state sickness insurance: a review’, British Review of Economic Issues, 12, 1739.Google Scholar
Holmes, P. and Lynch, M. (1988a), ‘An analysis of invalidity benefit claim durations for new claimants in 1977/8, and 1982/3’, mimeo, Department of Economics and Government, Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic and Department of Economics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Holmes, P. and Lynch, M. (1988b), ‘An analysis of invalidity benefit claim durations for the stock of claimants in 1977 and 1982’, mimeo, Department of Economics and Government, Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic and Department of Economics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Holmes, P. and Lynch, M. (1990), ‘An analysis of invalidity benefit claim durations for new male claimants in 1977/8 and 1982/3’, Journal of Health Economics. 7183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. (1988), ‘An analysis of invalidity benefit claim durations in Great Britain in 1979/80’, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Molho, I. (1988), ‘Going onto invalidity benefit: a study for women. 1977/8 to 1983/4’, mimeo, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Molho, I. (1989), ‘A disaggregate model of flows onto invalidity benefit’, Applied Economics, 21, 237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molho, I. (1990). ‘Modelling changes in the pattern of inflows onto invalidity benefit, 1977/8 to 1983/4’, International Journal of Applied Economics, 4, 112–25.Google Scholar