Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:05:01.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk Factors for Severe Child Poverty in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

MONICA MAGADI*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, City University, London EC1V 0HB email: [email protected]

Abstract

Despite recent declines in child poverty in the UK, there is evidence that children from the poorest families remain a legitimate concern. Little is known about the circumstances of children in severe poverty for whom policy responses may need to be different. This study examines the extent and risk factors of severe child poverty in the UK, based on the 2004/5 Family Resources Survey. Given the multi-dimensional nature of poverty, its measurement encompasses both material deprivation (child and parent deprivation) and low household income. The results show significant regional variations in severe child poverty experience, ranging from 3 per cent of children in South and East England to 10 per cent in London. The multinomial logistic regression results conform to what might be expected, showing relatively high risks of severe poverty among children: with workless parents; whose parents have low levels of education; in large families of four or more children; from ethnic minority groups, especially of Asian origin; and in families with disabled adult(s). However, the results with respect to lone parenthood and benefit receipt do not conform to expected patterns. For instance, the overall risk of severe poverty is lower for children of lone parents, compared to those of similar background characteristics with both parents. Also, the results suggest that non-receipt of benefits in the family is associated with higher likelihood of experience of severe child poverty, an issue that requires policy attention and is worth investigating in future research.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, L., Middleton, S. and Ashworth, K. (2003), Britain's Poorest Children: Severe and Persistent Poverty and Social Exclusion, London: Save the Children.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. and Finch, N. (2003), ‘Overlaps in dimensions of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 4, 513–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J., Middleton, S., Davis, A., Oldfield, N., Smith, N., Cusworth, L. and Williams, J. (2008), A Minimum Income Standard for Britain: What People Think, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Goodman, A., Shaw, J. and Shephard, A. (2005), Poverty and Inequality in Britain, Tunbridge Wells, London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies, Petersons.Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Muriel, A., Phillips, D. and Sibieta, L. (2008), Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2008, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Cappellari, L. and Jenkins, S. (2004), ‘Summarizing multiple deprivation’, Paper presented at the 28th General Conference of the international Association for Research on Income and Wealth, Cork, Ireland, 22–28 August.Google Scholar
Department of Work and Pensions (2003), Measuring Child Poverty, London: DWP.Google Scholar
Department of Work and Pensions (2004), Report on Child Poverty in the UK, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Work and Pensions (2005), Family Resources Survey: United Kingdom 2004–05, London: DWP, ONS, available at http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/frs/2004_05/pdfonly/frs_2004_05_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Work and Pensions (2006), Households Below Average Income 1994/95 – 2004/05, London: DWP.Google Scholar
Department of Work and Pensions (2008), Households Below Average Income: An Analysis of the Income Distribution 1994/95– 2006/70, London: DWP.Google Scholar
Expert Group on Poverty Statistics (2006), Compendium of Best Practices in Poverty Measurement, Santiago, Chile: Rio Group.Google Scholar
Filmer, D. and Pritchett, L. (2001), ‘Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India’, Demography, 38: 1, 115–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, D., Adelman, L., Ashworth, K., Bradshaw, J., Levitas, R., Middleton, S., Pantazis, C., Patsios, D., Payne, S., Townsend, P. and Williams, J. (2000), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Hallerod, B. (1995), ‘The truly poor: direct and indirect consensual measurement of poverty in Sweden’, Journal of European Social Policy, 5: 2, 111–29.Google Scholar
Heikkila, M., Moisio, P., Ritakallio, V-M., Bradshaw, J., Kuivalainen, S., Hellsten, K. and Kajoja, J. (2006), ‘Poverty policies, structures and outcomes in the EU 25’, Report to the Fifth European Round Table on Poverty and Social Exclusion, Stakes Helsinki, Finland, available at http://www.stm.fi/Resource.phx/eng/subjt/inter/eu2006/round/round1.htx.i1153.pdfGoogle Scholar
Magadi, M. and Middleton, S. (2005), ‘Britain's poorest children revisited: evidence from BHPS (1994–2002)’, CRSP Research Report 3, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Magadi, M. and Middleton, S. (2007), Severe Child Poverty in the UK, London: Save the Children Fund.Google Scholar
McKay, S. (2004), ‘Poverty of preference: what do consensual deprivation indicators really measure?’, Fiscal Studies, 25: 2, 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, S. and Collard, S. (2004), ‘Developing deprivation questions for the Family Resources Survey’, IAD Research Division Working Paper No. 13, London: Department for Work and Pensions, available at http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/wp2004.aspGoogle Scholar
Muffels, R. (1993), ‘Deprivation standards and style of living indices’, in Berghman, J. and Cantillion, B. (eds.), The European Face of Social Security, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. (1999), ‘Targeting poverty: lessons from Ireland on setting a national poverty target’, New Economy, 6: 1, 4449, Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. and Whelan, C. T. (2005), ‘On the multidimensionality of poverty and social exclusion’, Presentation at the European Consortium for Sociological Research Conference on Comparative European Studies, Assessing Ten Years of Sociological Research 1995–2005, Paris, 25–26 November.Google Scholar
Oldfield, N. and Bradshaw, J. (2008), ‘Minimum income standards: uprating and rebasing minimum income standards’, Working Paper, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.Google Scholar
Perry, B. (2002), ‘The mismatch between income measures and direct outcome measures of poverty’, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 19: 101–27.Google Scholar
Ringen, S. (1988), ‘Direct and indirect measures of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 17: 351–65.Google Scholar
Rutstein, S. O. and Johnston, K. (2004), The DHS Wealth Index, DHS Comparative Reports No. 6, Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
Sutherland, H. (2001), ‘Five Labour budgets (1997–2001): impacts on the distribution of household incomes and on child poverty’, Micro-simulation Unit Research Note No. 41, May 2001.Google Scholar
Willitts, M. (2006), ‘Measuring child poverty using material deprivation: possible approaches’, Working Paper No. 28, London: Department of Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Magadi supplementary material

Questionnaire.pdf

Download Magadi supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 60.6 KB