¹ The synthetic ambitions of the ‘new social policy’ are demonstrated by Donnison's, David ‘Social Policy since Titmuss’, Journal of Social Policy, 8:2 (1979), 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² The claim to be ‘doing sociology’ was made purely linguistically, thus his third paper on the NHS was subtitled ‘Science and the Sociology of Medical Care’, Titmuss, R. M., Essays on the Welfare State (EWS), Allen and Unwin, London, 1958.Google Scholar

³ Titmuss, , EWS, op. cit.Google Scholar

⁴ Titmuss, R. M., Social Policy (SP), posthumously edited by Abel-Smith, Brian and Titmuss, Kay, Allen and Unwin, London, 1975, p. 59.Google Scholar

⁵ Titmuss, R. M., Problems of Social Policy (PSP), HMSO, London, 1950.Google Scholar

⁶ Reisman, D. A., Richard Titmuss: Welfare Society, Heinemann, London, 1977.Google Scholar

⁷ Leach, Edmund, New Society, 21 01 1971, p. 114.Google Scholar

⁸ Titmuss, R. M., The Gift Relationship: from Human Blood to Social Policy (GR), Allen and Unwin, London, 1970.Google Scholar

⁹ Both papers are included in EWS, op. cit.

¹⁰ Ibid. p. 98.

¹¹ Friedmann, G., Industrial Society: The Emergence of the Human Problems of Automation, Glencoe Illinois Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar

¹² Titmuss, , EWS, op. cit. p. 117.Google Scholar

¹³ Donnison, , op. cit.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Tawney, R. H., New Statesman and Nation, 22 04 1950, 454–6.Google Scholar

¹⁵ This period is reported in Donnison, op. cit. and in Margaret Gowing's biographical essay ‘Richard Morris Titmuss’, Proceedings of the British Academy, LXI (1975), 401–27.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Wilensky, H. and Lebaux, C., Industrial Society and Social Welfare, Sage, New York, 1958.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Wedderburn, Dorothy, ‘Facts and Theories of the Welfare State’, in Miliband, Ralph and Saville, John (eds), The Socialist Register, Merlin, London, 1965, pp. 139–45.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Titmuss was very quick to see the challenge of the IEA while most people concerned with social policy underestimated their potential influence.

¹⁹ Titmuss, R. M., Poverty and Population: A Factual Study of Social Waste, Macmillan, London, 1938.Google Scholar

²⁰ This optimistic reversal ‘I believe the present alarm is unjustified’ appeared initially in an article in Political Quarterly, XXVI:2 (1955) and was republished in EWS, op. cit. p. 56.Google Scholar

²¹ Titmuss, R. M. and Clark, Frederick Le Gros, Our Food Problem, Penguin Special, Harmondsworth, 1939.Google Scholar

²² Titmuss, R. M. and Titmuss, Kay, The Parents Revolt, Seeker and Warburg, London, 1942.Google Scholar

²³ Titmuss, R. M., Birth Poverty and Wealth, Hamish Hamilton, London, 1943.Google Scholar

²⁴ Gowing, , op. cit.Google Scholar

²⁵ See Pinker's introduction to Reismann, , op. cit.Google Scholar

²⁶ Gowing, , op. cit.Google Scholar

²⁷ Nairn, Tom, The Left Against Europe, Penguin in association with New Left Review, Harmondsworth, 1973.Google Scholar

²⁸ Titmuss, , GR, op. cit.Google Scholar

²⁹ Titmuss, R. M. and Abel-Smith, Brian, The Cost of the NHS in England and Wales, Cambridge University Press, 1956.Google Scholar

³⁰ Titmuss, R. M., Abel-Smith, Brian and Lynes, Tony, Social Policies and Population Growth in Mauritius, 1961.Google Scholar

³¹ Titmuss, R. M. and Able-Smith, Brian, The Health Services of Tanganyika, 1964.Google Scholar

³² A process importantly aided by Seebohm Rowntree's repeat study of poverty in York in 1951: Rowntree, B. S. and Lavers, G. R., Poverty and the Welfare State, Longmans Green, London, 1951.Google Scholar

³³ Saville, John, ‘Labour and Income Distribution’, in Miliband, R. and Saville, J. (eds), The Socialist Register, Merlin, London, 1965.Google Scholar

³⁴ Thompson, Dorothy, ‘The Welfare State: An Historical Approach’, New Reasoner, 4 (1957), 127–8.Google Scholar

³⁵ Abel-Smith, Brian, ‘Whose Welfare State?’ in McKenzie, N. (ed.), Conviction, McGibbon and Kee, London, 1957.Google Scholar

³⁶ Harvey, Audrey, Casualties of the Welfare State, Fabian Society, London, 1960.Google Scholar

³⁷ Townsend, Peter, ‘Measuring Poverty’, British Journal of Sociology, V:2 (1954), 130–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁸ Townsend, Peter, The Last Refuge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1962.Google Scholar

³⁹ Titmuss, R. M., The Irresponsible Society (IS), Fabian Society, London, 1959.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Gough, Ian, The Political Economy of Welfare, Macmillan, London, 1979, p. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴¹ This conservatism was perhaps best shown in Titmuss's attitude to the welfare rights movement. His own work fostered the view that welfare was a right in the good society yet as his Political Quarterly article ‘Welfare Rights: Law and Discretion’, (04 1971)Google Scholar, and the introduction to the first SBC Handbook were to show, his conception of a ‘right’ was very different from that of the new poverty lawyers.

⁴² Titmuss, R. M., Income Distribution and Social Change, Allen and Unwin, London, 1962.Google Scholar

⁴³ Gouldner, Alvin, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, Heinemann, London, 1971, pp. 500–3.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ The late Professor E. B. Chain was afforded this benefit in his then new post at Imperial College. A private foundation, utilizing monies which would otherwise have gone to the Exchequer, aided the College in their effort to recruit the Nobel Prize winner to the new biochemistry department opened in 1964.

⁴⁵ Townsend, Peter, Poverty in the United Kingdom, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1979.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Inequalities in Health (Black Report), Department of Health and Social Security, London, 1980.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Sinfield, Adrian, ‘Analyses in the Social Division of Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 7:2 (1978), 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁸ Land, Hilary, ‘Women: Supporters or Supported?’, in Barker, Diana Leonard and Allen, Sheila (eds.), Sexual Divisions and Society, Tavistock, London, 1978Google Scholar; Land, Hilary, ‘Who Cares for the Family?’, Journal of Social Policy, 7:3 (07 1978), 275–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Land, Hilary, ‘The Family Wage’, Feminist Review, 6 (1980), 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁹ John Greve's, and his colleagues', work on homelessness removes much of the psychopathological definition of the victim and transfers it to the socio circumstances in which the homeless person finds him or herself. See Greve, J., London's Homeless, Bell, London, 1964Google Scholar; and Greve, J., Homelessness in London, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1971.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Some beginnings have been made. In Britain these would include writings about the experience of battered women and homelessness. See Hanmer, Jalna, ‘Violence and the Social Control of Women’ in Littlejohn, G., Wakeford, J. and Davies, N. Yural (eds), Power and the State, Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar; and Rose, Hilary, ‘In Practice Supported in Theory Denied: an account of an invisible social movement’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2:3 (1978), 521–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar A recent book more generally discussing the issue is Brion, Marion and Tinker, Anthea, Women in Housing, The Housing Centre Trust, London, 1980.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Reisman, , op. cit.Google Scholar

⁵² Gowing, , op. cit.Google Scholar

⁵³ Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard, Regulating the Poor, Pantheon, New York, 1971Google Scholar; and Poor People's Movements, Pantheon, New York, 1977.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ O'Connor, James, The Fiscal Crisis of the State, St Martins Press, New York, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁵ Gough, , op. cit.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Donnison, , op. cit.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Wilensky, H., The New Corporatism: Centralism and the Welfare State, New York, 1976.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ The political economy of the city, particularly in the hands of the structuralist Manuel Castello and his Paris colleagues, has been highly influential in recent years. Two useful collections written within a political economy approach are Pickvance, Christopher (ed.), Urban Sociology: Critical Essays, Tavistock, London, 1976Google Scholar; and Harloe, Michael (ed.), Captive Cities, John Wiley, London, 1977.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ While it is too soon to say that an effective feminist critique of this work has been mounted, there are useful beginnings in the special issue of ‘Women and the City’ of the International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 2:3 (1978)Google Scholar; see the contributions of Garmikov, Eva, Ettore, E. M. and Rose, Hilary; see also the special issue of Signs, ‘Women and the American City’, 5:3 (1980).Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Engels, Frederick, ‘The Origin of the Family: Private Property and the State’, preface to Marx Engels: Selected Works, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1968, p. 449.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Marx, Karl, The German Ideology, Part I, Feuerbach, International Publishers, New York, 1947, p. 22.Google Scholar

⁶² This debate, which importantly restored housework as visible labour, so that left and right economists alike calculate it as contributing another 30–40 per cent of GNP, became so involved in remarkably sterile debates as to whether it contributed use value or exchange value that the significance that it was almost entirely carried out by women was lost. In Britain the debate was most sharply expressed in an exchange between Christine Delphy and Michelle Barrett and Mary McKintosh. See Delphy, C., The Main Enemy, Women's Research and Resources Centre, London, 1976Google Scholar; Barrett, M. and McKintosh, M., ‘Christine Delphy Towards a Materialist Feminism?’, Feminist Review, 1 (1979), 95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Delphy, C., ‘A Materialist Feminism is Possible’, Feminist Review, 3 (1979), 79–105.Google Scholar

⁶³ See Aries, P., Centuries of Childhood, Vantage, New York, 1962Google Scholar; Rapp, R., Ross, E. and Bridenthal, R., ‘Examining Family History’, Feminist Studies, 5:1 (1979), 74–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stone, L., The Family, Sex and Marriage 1500–1800, Harper Row, New York, 1977Google Scholar; Lasch, C., Haven in a Heartless World, Basic Books, New York, 1977.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Hartmann, Heidi, ‘The Family as a Locus of Gender, Class and Political Struggle: The Example of Housework’, Signs, VI:2 (Spring 1981).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Oren, Laura, ‘The Welfare of Women in Labouring Families: England 1860–1950’, Feminist Studies, V:1 (1974), 107–25.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Barnard, Jessie, The Future of Marriage, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1972.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Land, , ‘The Family Wage’, op. cit.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ See Oren, , op. cit.Google Scholar; Hartman, , op. cit.Google Scholar; and Young, Michael, ‘The Distribution of Income within the Family’, British Journal of Sociology, 3 (1952), 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁹ Hakim, Catherine, ‘Sexual Divisions within the Labour Force: Occupation Segregation’, Department of Employment Gazette, 11 1978.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Kickbush, Ilona, ‘Women's Paid and Unpaid Labour’, paper given at the Research Committee on Social Policy, International Sociological Conference,Uppsala, 1978.Google Scholar

⁷¹ For this argument directed towards the connections between women's labour, the family and the welfare state see Balbo, Laura, ‘The Family and the British Welfare State’ (translated mimeo from) Balbo, L. and Sahar, R., Interferize: Lo Stato, La Vita Familiare, LaVita Priva, Milan, 1979Google Scholar; Rose, Hilary, ‘Towards a Feminist Political Economy of Welfare’, paper given at the Research Committee on Social Policy, International Sociological Association Conference,Uppsala, 1978Google Scholar; Wilson, Elizabeth, Women and the Welfare State, Tavistock, London, 1976Google Scholar; and Zaretsky, Eli, ‘The Welfare State and the Family’, mimeo, Duke University, 1980.Google Scholar

⁷² Gershuny, Jay, After Industrial Society, Macmillan, London, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷³ Bott, Elizabeth, Famliy and Social Network, Tavistock, London, 1957.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Rappoport, R. L. and Rappoport, R., Dual Career Families, Tavistock, London, 1971.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Young, Michael and Wilmott, Peter, The Symmetrical Family, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1973.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Ehrenrich, Barbara and English, Deidre, For Her Own Good, Pluto, London, 1979.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Hartman, , op. cit.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ The concordance between this objective and the views of the Secretary of State for Social Service will not have escaped the reader.

⁸⁰ Young, Michael, ‘The Distribution of Income within the Family’, op. cit.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Pahl, Jan, ‘Patterns of Money Management within Marriage’, Journal of Social Policy, 9:3 (07 1980), 313–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸² See London Women's Liberation Campaign for Legal and Financial Independence and Rights of Women, ‘Disaggregation Now! Another Battle for Women's Independence’, Feminist Review, 2 (1979), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸³ Barnard, , op. cit.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Townsend, , Poverty in the United Kingdom, op. cit.Google Scholar