Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:10:41.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public Welfare: The Road to Freedom?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Abstract

This article is concerned with the extent to which systems of public welfare can be said to have reduced or enlarged personal freedom. It looks, first of all, at the kind of arguments which have been advanced both in support of, and against, the notion of ‘the Welfare State’ as a defender or promoter of individual liberty. Secondly, it examines some of the freedoms which are said to have been threatened or enhanced, including ‘freedom of choice’, ‘freedom of disposition’ and ‘freedom of action’. Finally, it argues that many of these are ‘secondary’ freedoms, contingent upon the primary condition of freedom from economic need. Following Roosevelt we conclude that ‘true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence’ and that, although public welfare may have been partly responsible for an overall ‘levelling-up’ of freedoms, the distribution of such freedoms still reflects inequalities of income, status and power.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berlin, Isaiah (1958), Two concepts of liberty, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
SirBeveridge, William (1942), Social insurance and allied services, Cmnd. 6404, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Employment/Department of Health and Social Security (DE/DHSS) (1981), Payment of Benefits to Unemployed People, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Field, Frank (1981), Inequality in Britain: freedom, welfare and the state, Fontana, London.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Norman (1979), Class, capital and social policy, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Ralph and Seldon, Arthur (1979), Over-ruled on welfare, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.Google Scholar
Komisar, Lucy (1974), Down and out in the USA, New Viewpoints edition, USA.Google Scholar
Laurie, Peter (1974), Meet your friendly social system, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C. Jr (1967), ‘Negative and positive freedom’, Philosophical Review, 74:3, 312–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCord, Norman (1978), ‘Ratepayers and social policy’, in Thane, Pat (ed.) The origins of British social policy, Croom Helm, London, pp. 2135.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1965), ‘The right to welfare’, Sociological Review, 13:3, 261–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, T. H. (1975), Social Policy (4th ed.), Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Martin, J. P. (1978), Violence and the family, Wiley, London.Google Scholar
Miller, S. M. (1969), ‘The Great Society's Poor Law: review article’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 385, 175–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. M. and Roby, Pamela (1970), The future of inequality, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Moore, Peter (1981), ‘Scroungermania again at the DHSS’, New Society, 55:949, 138–9.Google Scholar
Nissel, Muriel (1980), ‘The family and the Welfare State’, New Society, 53:925, 259–62.Google Scholar
Reich, Charles (1964), ‘The new property’, Yale Law Journal, 73, 773–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Charles (1965), ‘Individual rights and social welfare: the emerging legal Issues’, Yale Law Journal, 74, 1245–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, Eric (1977), The personal social services, Pitman, London.Google Scholar
Steiner, Gilbert (1971), The state of welfare, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Tawney, R. H. (1964), Equality (4th ed.), Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard (1971), ‘Welfare rights, law and discretion’, Political Quarterly, 42:1, 113–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, Richard (1976), Essays on the Welfare State (3rd ed.), Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar