Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:37:52.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Living Standards Using Existing National Data Sets*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Sandra Hutton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study reported on in this paper used existing data to create a broad measure of living standards as advocated by Townsend (1979) in developing his concept of relative deprivation. Linked data from the General Household Survey and the Family Expenditure Survey was used to compare the living standards of households at different income levels. A particular focus of the study was the living standards of households on supplementary benefit (as it was at the time of the surveys). Analyses showed that in general they score less well on individual indicators of living standards than other households of the same type on low incomes. A summary index was developed which indicated the similarity of standards of living for households on supplementary benefit (SB) irrespective of household type. The specific indices constructed for each of the family types investigated suggested that families on SB with children have a relatively lower standard of living than other families with children whereas elderly households on supplementary benefit are not so deprived in comparison with other elderly households.

Type
Research Note
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 237 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, A.B. (1974), ‘Poverty and income, inequality in Britain’, in Wedderburn, D. (ed.), Poverty, Inequality and Class Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (1984), ‘How should we measure poverty: some conceptual issues’, paper for symposium on the measurement of poverty, Berlin.Google Scholar
Baker, K., Harris, P. and O'Brien, J. (1989), ‘Data fusion: an appraisal and experimental evaluation’, paper presented to the Royal Statistical Society, 03 1989.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. (1989), ‘Evaluating adequacy of income support: the potential of research on budgets’, House of Commons Social Services Committee Report on Minimum Incomes, HMSO, HC 579.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J., Cooke, K. and Godfrey, C. (1984), ‘The impact of unemployment on the living standards of families’, Journal of Social Policy, 12: 4, 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. and Morgan, J. (1987), Budgeting on Benefits, Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J., Lawton, D. and Cooke, K. (1987), ‘Income and expenditure of teenagers and their families’, Youth and Policy, 19, 15–19.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J., Mitchell, D. and Morgan, J. (1987), ‘Evaluating adequacy: the potential of budget standards’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, K.R. and Baldwin, S.M. (1984), How much is enough? A review of supplementary scale rates, Occasional Paper no. 1, Family Policy Studies Centre, London.Google Scholar
Desai, M. (1986), ‘Drawing the line: on defining the poverty threshold’, in Golding, P. (ed.), Excluding the Poor, Child Poverty Action Group, London.Google Scholar
Desai, M. and Shah, A. (1988), ‘An economic approach to the measurement of poverty’, Oxford Economic Papers, 40, 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DHSS (1985), Reform of Social Security, Cmnd 9518, HMSO.Google Scholar
Donnison, D. (1988), ‘Defining and measuring poverty. A reply to Stein Ringen’, Journal of Social Policy, 17: 3, 367–374.Google Scholar
Elliott, D. and Heady, P. (1989), ‘Some comments on data fusion’, Survey Methodology Bulletin No. 25, OPCS, Social Survey Division.Google Scholar
Family Budget Unit (1990), Working Paper No. 1, Family Budget Unit, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York.Google Scholar
Heady, P. and Smyth, M. (1989), Living Standards During Unemployment, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Hutton, S. (1989), ‘Testing Townsend: exploring living standards using secondary data analysis’, in Baldwin, S., Godfrey, C. and Propper, C. (eds), The Quality of Life, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mack, J. and Lansley, S. (1985), Poor Britain, George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
McClements, L. (1975), ‘Equivalence scales for children’, miraeo, DHSS.Google Scholar
Millar, J. and Bradshaw, J.R. (1987), ‘The living standards of lone parent families’, Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs, 3:4, 233–52.Google Scholar
O'Higgins, M., Bradshaw, J. and Walker, R. (1988), ‘Income distribution over the life cycle’, in Walker, R. and Parker, G. (eds), Money Matters, Sage.Google Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1979), The Cost of a Child, Poverty Pamphlet No. 43, Child Poverty Action Group, London.Google Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1981), ‘Peter Townsend and the Holy Grail’, New Society, 57, 982.Google Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1987), ‘Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 147–164.Google Scholar
Ringen, S. (1988), ‘Direct and indirect measures of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 17: 3, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. (1901), Poverty—A Study of Town Life, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1987), ‘The standard of living: lecture 1, concepts and critiques’, in Hawthorne, G. (ed.), The Standard of Living, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (1989), ‘Data fusion: report and comments in a paper presented to the Royal Statistical Society’, Survey Methodology Bulletin No. 25, OPCS, Social Survey Division, 07.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom, Allen Lane.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. (1987), ‘Deprivation’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. and Gordon, D. (1989), ‘What is enough? New evidence on poverty allowing the definition of a minimum benefit’, paper presented at the International Sociological Association International Seminar on the Sociology of Social Security, University of Edinburgh, 4–607, 1989.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to poverty lines and social security’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 183–212.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1989), ‘The concepts of minimum income and the basis of the social security scales’, paper for the JRMT workshop on social security, 14 07.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to the definition of poverty: towards an alternative methodology’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. and Hutton, S. (1988), ‘The costs of ageing and retirement’, in Walker, R. and Parker, G. (eds), Money Matters, Sage.Google Scholar