Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:53:26.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Knowledge and Perceptions of the Social Services*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Abstract

This article reports on an attempt to discover the attitudes of members of the public towards a range of personal and family problems, all of which could be seen as relevant to the work of social service departments. The data are drawn from two samples: one of current users of a social services department and the other from the general public.

Our outline findings show that although users seem more aware of the potential of social service departments than other members of the community, there is nevertheless substantial confusion and disagreement over appropriate services for different problem situations. It was equally clear that for several quite important problems many people saw voluntary or neighbourhood involvement as more relevant than intervention by a statutory agency. On the basis of these findings we discuss the following suggestions for social service departments. Firstly, education programmes are necessary to improve general knowledge about the personal social services, but structured in such a way as to avoid stimulating demand which cannot be met – we are critical of the Seebohm report's analogy of personal social services with commerce. Secondly, more attention needs to be paid to relationships between social workers and other professionals who may be intermediaries in contacts between the potential client and the agency. Thirdly, social service departments should assess their own priorities with greater sensitivity towards the community viewpoint, since we found not only a significant willingness for people to get involved in social service but a keenness to participate in policy making.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services (Seebohm Report), Cmnd. 3703, London: HMSO. 1968.Google Scholar

2 Report of the Working Party on Social Workers in the Local Authority Health and Welfare Services (Younghusband Report), London: HMSO, 1959.Google Scholar

3 Nursten, J., Pottinger, J., and Anderson, M., Social Workers and their Clients, Bradford: University of Bradford 1972Google Scholar; Gravett, S. M. (1974), Consumer Research Survey (available from Social Services Department, Commerce House, Hunter Street, Chester)Google Scholar; Timms, N., The Receiving End: Consumer accounts of social help for children, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973Google Scholar; McKay, A., Goldberg, E. M., and Fruin, D. J., ‘Consumers and a Social Services Department’. Social Work Today, vol. 4, no. 16, 15.11.73Google Scholar; Goldberg, E. M., and Neill, J. E., Social Work in General Practice, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1972.Google Scholar

4 Glastonbury, B., Burdett, M., and Austin, R., ‘Community Perceptions and the Personal Services’, Policy and Politics, vol. 1, no. 3, 03 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Mayer, J. E., and Timms, N., The Client Speaks, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.Google Scholar

6 A second survey of clients has since been undertaken in 1975, and a paper comparing the two studies is in preparation.

7 Nursten et et.al., Gravett, and Goldberg and Neill, op.cit.

8 Moser, C. A., Survey Methods in Social Investigation, London: Heinemann, 1959.Google Scholar

9 Glastonbury et al., op. cit.; Maclean, U., ‘Sources of Help’, New Society, 5.4.73.Google Scholar

10 Seebohm Report, op. cit.

11 Ministry of Health, National Health Service: The Administrative Structure of the Medical and Related Services in England and Wales; London: HMSO, 1968.Google Scholar

12 The Consumer and the Social Services in Avon Comity, Report of the Joint Advisory Group of Staff and Consumer Interests, July 1973.Google Scholar