Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:47:57.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Knights, Knaves and Gnashers: Professional Values and Private Dentistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2000

PETER TAYLOR-GOOBY
Affiliation:
University of Kent
STELLA SYLVESTER
Affiliation:
University of Kent
MIKE CALNAN
Affiliation:
University of Kent
GRAHAM MANLEY
Affiliation:
University of Kent

Abstract

This article applies Le Grand's distinction between knightly and knavish motivations to the behaviour of dentists in choosing whether to treat patients on the NHS or privately. Using national quantitative and discursive surveys, it shows that dentists' notions of their own interests centre on independent small-business entrepreneurship and their professional culture defines patient interest in terms of access to clinically autonomous practice based on a restorative paradigm. Government attempts to promote preventive dentistry in the context of the weakening in dentists' bargaining position as general dental health improves and the determination of the profession to protect high remuneration have led to conflict. Both knavish and knightly motives (understood from the perspective of dentists' professional culture) lead dentists to exit from the NHS. Any analysis of ‘robust’ policies, designed to accommodate both motivations, must take into account social factors such as professional cultures which influence how practitioners understand their own interests and those of their clients.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The support of the NHS Executive South Thames and the ESRC Economic Beliefs and Behaviour Research Programme (grant no. L122341001) is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper are the responsibility of the authors.