Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:48:06.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Justice and the Bounds of Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

John Edwards
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The welfare state is but the vehicle for the provision of welfare and the latter does not necessarily entail the former. Much recent debate occasioned by government policy and rhetoric has therefore confused means and ends. This paper argues that a defence of welfare must come before a concern for protecting the welfare state. A number of foundations for guaranteed welfare provision, including justice, rights and contract are considered but the most persuasive foundation for welfare as need-meeting is found to lie in the Kantian categorical imperatives. Not only do these provide a moral prescription that welfare ought to be provided, they also dictate the ways in which it ought to be provided. It is against these requirements therefore that the necessity of a welfare state as a means of providing welfare can be tested. The second part of the paper then considers how extensive a welfare state needs to be, and how the boundaries between the public and private domains in the provision of welfare may be drawn. The equality principle, allied to the notion of equality of welfare, is found to be a useful instrument in determining the bounds of the public domain but only (so the paper concludes reluctantly) when harnessed to objective specifications of need.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 127 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aristotle, (1925), The Nicomachean Ethics, (25th Edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1965), Political Argument, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1973), The Liberal Theory of Justice, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Batley, R. (1972), ‘An explanation of non-participation in planning’, Policy and Politics, 1:2, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benn, S.I. and Peters, R.S. (1959), Social Principles and the Democratic State, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Blackstone, W.T. (1967), ‘On the meaning and justification of the equality principle’, Ethics, 77:4, 239–53.Google Scholar
Brandt, R.B. (1976), ‘The concept of welfare’ in Timms, N. and Watson, D. (eds.), Talking about Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Braybrooke, D. (1968), ‘Let needs diminish that preferences may prosper’, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, No. 1, 86–107.Google Scholar
Coates, K. and Silburn, R. (1970), Poverty: The Forgotten Englishmen, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Cranston, M. (1967), ‘Human rights real and supposed’ in Raphael, D.D. (ed.), Political Theory and the Rights of Man, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Downie, R.S. and Telfer, E. (1976), ‘Respect for persons and public morality’ in Timms, N. and Watson, D. (eds), Talking about Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1977), Taking Rights Seriously, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (1986), Positive Discrimination, Social Justice and Social Policy, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1973), Social Philosophy, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Flew, A. (1983), ‘Justice: real or social?’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1:1, 151–71.Google Scholar
Frankena, W.K. (1962), ‘The concept of social justice’, in Brandt, R.B. (ed.), Social Justice, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Frankena, W.K. (1963), Ethics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Fried, C. (1978), Right and Wrong. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, C. (1983), ‘Distributive justice’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1:1, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, B.B. (1966), The Evolution of National Insurance in Great Britain: The Origins of the Welfare State, Michael Joseph, London.Google Scholar
Golding, M.P. (1984), ‘The primacy of welfare rights’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1:2, 119–36.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (1979), The Political Economy of the Welfare State, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1983), ‘Justice and moral bargaining’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1:1, 114–31.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1960), The Constitution of Liberty, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1976), Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. II. The Mirage of Social Justice, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. (1981), States of Welfare, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Honoré, A.M. (1968), ‘Social justice’ in Summers, R.S. (ed.), Essays in Legal Philosophy, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Grand, J. Le and Robinson, R. (eds) (1984), Privatisation and the Welfare State, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Lessnoff, M. (1986), Social Contract, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, D. (1975), ‘Nature and soundness of the contract and coherence arguments’ in Daniels, N. (ed.), Reading Rawls: Critical Studies of ‘A Theory of Justice’ Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mayo, B. (1986), The Philosophy of Right and Wrong, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1976), Social Justice, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Miliband, R. (1973), The State in Capitalist Society, Quartet Books, London.Google Scholar
Nowell-Smith, P. (1934), Ethics, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974), Anarchy, State and Utopia, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. (1973), The Fiscal Crisis of the State, St. Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
Peroni, F. (1983), Justifications for the Welfare State: A Search for a Concept, paper presented to SSRC seminar on Political Theory and Social Policy, University of York, March.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1980). Judging Justice: An Introduction to Contemporary Political Philosophy Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. (1971), Social Theory and Social Policy, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Plant, R. (1980), ‘Needs and welfare’ in Timms, N. (ed.), Social Welfare: Why and How?, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Plant, R. (1985). ‘The very idea of a welfare state’ in Bean, P., Ferris, J. and Whynes, D. (eds), In Defence of Welfare, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Raphael, D.D. (1955), Moral judgement, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1966), Distributive Justice, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Runciman, W.G. (1966), Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1985), Public Opinion, Ideology and State Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Dale, J. (1981), Social Theory and Social Welfare, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Thurow, L. (1979), ‘A theory of groups and economic redistribution’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9:1, 25–41.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1976), ‘Welfare state and welfare society’ in Timms, N. and Watson, D. (eds), Talking About Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1987). ‘Deprivation’, Journal of Social Policy, 16:2, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Praag, B., Hagenaars, A. and van Weeren, J. (1982), ‘Poverty in Europe’. Review of income and Wealth, 28, 345–359.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to poverty lines and social security’, Journal of Social Policy, 16:2, 183–211.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G.(1962), ‘Justice and equality’ in Brandt, R.B. (ed.), Social Justice, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to the definition of poverty: towards an alternative methodology’, Journal of Social Policy, 16:2, 213–226.Google Scholar
Warnock, G.J. (1967), Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Weale, A. (1978), Equality and Social Policy, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1972), Morality: an Introduction to Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Young, K. (1985), ‘Shades of opinion’ in Jowell, R. and Witherspoon, S. (eds), British Social Attitudes: the 1985 Report, Gower, London.Google Scholar