Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:58:42.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Rights to Activation: The Evolution of the Idea of Basic Income in the Finnish Political Debate, 1980–2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2019

JOHANNA PERKIÖ*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014Finland email: [email protected]

Abstract

The article contributes to the growing body of research on the politics of basic income by analysing the framing of the idea in the context of Finland, a country with a long history of debate and one of the forerunners in experimenting with this policy. Using a comprehensive dataset of political documents covering 36 years, the study shows how contextual factors and shifts in political climate shaped the framing of the idea. It also shows that the key frames describing basic income were widely shared among the politicians and parties discussing the policy. The study enriches our understanding of the politics of basic income by adding an ideational perspective that has for long been a missing element in this field of research.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, J.O. (2000), The history of an idea. Why did basic income thrill the Finns, but not the Swedes? In: van der Veen, R. and Groot, L. (Eds.), Basic income on the agenda: policy objectives and political chances (pp. 224237), Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. (2005), ‘Ideas and social policy: an institutionalist perspective’, Social Policy & Administration, 39, 1, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. (2009), ‘Ideas, institutions, and policy change’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 5, 701718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. and Cox, R.H. (Eds.) (2010), Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. and Mahon, R. (2016), Advanced introduction to social policy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (1998), ‘Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy’, Theory and Society, 27, 3, 377409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisp, J. (2017), ‘Basic income: beyond left and right?’, Juncture, 234, 266270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, E. (2008), The heretical political discourse - a discourse analysis of the danish debate on basic income. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. (2015), An income of one’s own? The political analysis of universal basic income. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. (2016a), ‘Basic income in our time: improving political prospects through policy learning?’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 4, 617634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. (2016b), ‘The struggle for strategy: on the politics of the basic income proposal’, Politics, 36, 2, 131141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. and Noguera, J. (2012), On the political feasibility of a universal basic income. In: Caputo, R. (Ed.), Basic income guarantee and politics: international experiences and perspectives on the viability of income guarantee (pp. 1738), Palgrave MacMillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. and Stirton, L. (2012), ‘A disarmingly simple idea? Practical bottlenecks in the implementation of a universal basic income’, International Social Security Review, 65, 2, 103121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R.M. (1993), ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43, 4, 5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, W.A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W. and Sasson, T. (1992), ‘Media images and the social construction of reality’, Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiilamo, H. and Kangas, O. (2009), ‘Trap for women or freedom to choose? The struggle over cash for child care schemes in Finland and Sweden’, Journal of Social Policy, 38, 3, 457475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikkala, M. (2012), Finland: institutional resistance of the welfare state against a basic income. In: Caputo, R.K. (Ed.), Basic income guarantee and politics: international experiences and perspectives on the viability of income guarantee (pp. 6381), Palgrave MacMillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B. (2012), ‘The low road to basic income? Tax-benefit integration in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 41, 1, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kananen, J. (2012), ‘Nordic paths from welfare to workfare: Danish, Swedish and Finnish labour market reforms in comparison’, Local Economy, 27, 5–6, 558576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, O., Niemelä, M. and Varjonen, S. (2013), Narratives and numbers. Politics in the making of sickness insurance in Finland. In: Haggren, H., Rainio-Niemi, J. and Vauhkonen, J. (Eds.), Multi-layered historicity of the present. Approaches to social science history (pp. 271296), University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kangas, O. and Saloniemi, A. (2013), Historical making, present and future challenges for the Nordic welfare state model in Finland (NordMod2030. Sub-report 6). Oslo: Fafo. http://www.feps-europe.eu/assets/56b31bcd-535c-484c-831f-60bceff4567b/historical_making.pdf [accessed 4.11.2017]Google Scholar
Kantola, A. and Kananen, J. (2013), ‘Seize the moment: financial crisis and the making of the finnish competition state’, New Political Economy, 18, 6, 811826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J.W. (2010), Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, update edition, with an epilogue on health care (2nd edition). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Koistinen, P. and Perkiö, J. (2015), ‘Good and bad times of social innovations: the case of universal basic income in Finland’, Basic Income Studies, 9, 1–2, 2557.Google Scholar
Kuivalainen, S. and Niemelä, M. (2010), ‘From universalism to selectivism: the ideational turn of the anti-poverty policies in Finland’, Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 3, 263276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinelli, L. (2017), IPR policy brief: assessing the case for a universal basic income in the UK. Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, Bath. https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/ipr-policy-brief-assessing-the-case-for-a-universal-basic-income- [accessed 3.2.2018]Google Scholar
Niemelä, M. and Saarinen, A. (2012), ‘The role of ideas and institutional change in Finnish public sector reform’, Policy & Politics, 40, 2, 171191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, A., Salmenniemi, S. and Keränen, H. (2014), ‘Hyvinvointivaltiosta hyvinvoivaan valtioon. Hyvinvointi ja kansalaisuus suomalaisessa poliittisessa diskurssissa’, Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 79, 6, 605618.Google Scholar
Sloman, P. (2018), ‘Universal basic income in British politics, 1918-2018: from a ‘vagabond’s wage’ to a global debate’, Journal of Social Policy, 47, 3, 625642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing, G. (2017), Basic income: and how we can make it happen. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Steensland, B. (2008a), The failed welfare revolution: America’s struggle over guaranteed income policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steensland, B. (2008b), ‘Why do policy frames change? Actor-idea coevolution in debates over welfare reform’, Social Forces, 86, 3, 10271054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirton, L., De Wispelaere, J., Perkiö, J. and Chrisp, J. (2017), ‘Modelling political parties’ support for basic income in Finland, 1979-2016’, paper presented at 17th BIEN Congress, Lisbon, 25-27 September 2017.Google Scholar
Vanderborght, Y. (2006), ‘Why trade unions oppose basic income’, Basic Income Studies, 1, 1, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Parijs, P. and Vanderborght, Y. (2017), Basic income. A radical proposal for free society and a sane economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar