Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:35:18.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Poor Law to Positive Discrimination*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Richard Batley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The principle of positive discrimination in favour of the poor has emerged out of a tangled history of social welfare debate about universalism and selectivity. Positive discrimination, based on the idea of ‘inclusive’ selectivity, represents something of a hybrid of the two concepts. The ‘rediscovery of poverty’ and the recognition that universal benefits were not adequate or reaching intended beneficiaries contributed to the general case for specially channelled services. But the government's response has tended to be piecemeal, responding to specific pressures and criticisms with a wide array of small and separate programmes of positive discrimination. This article traces the particular pressures, in race relations, which contributed to the emergence of the Urban Aid Programme and shows what lessons were learned from the experience of the American poverty programmes.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 1978 , pp. 305 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Titmuss, Richard M., Commitment to Welfare, Allen and Unwin, London, 1968, p. 135.Google Scholar

2 Pinker, Robert, Social Theory and Social Policy, Heinemann, London, 1971, p. 190.Google Scholar

3 Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, 1834, p. 227.Google Scholar

4 Jordan, Bill, Poor Parents: Social Policy and the ‘Cycle of Deprivation’, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1974, p. 22.Google Scholar

5 Figures from Rodgers, Brian, The Battle Against Poverty, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1969.Google Scholar

6 Jordan, op. cit. p. 30.

7 Social Insurance and Allied Services (Beveridge Report), Cmd 6404, HMSO, London, 1942.Google Scholar

8 Ibid. p. 120.

9 Rodgers, op. cit. p. 56.

10 George, V. M., Social Security: Beveridge and After, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1968, p. 224.Google Scholar

11 Field, Frank and Grieve, Margaret, Abuse and the Abused, Poverty Pamphlet no. 10, Child Poverty Action Group, London, 1972, p. 6.Google Scholar

12 Forder, Anthony (ed.), Penelope Hall's Social Services of England and Wales, Routledgeand Kegan Paul, London, 1971, p. 104.Google Scholar

13 Abel-Smith, Brian and Townsend, Peter, The Poor and the Poorest, Occasional Papers in Social Administration no. 17, George Bell and Sons, London, 1965, p. 30.Google Scholar

14 Lynes, Tony, National Assistance and National Prosperity, Occasional Papers in Social Administration no. 5, Codicote Press, Welwyn, Hertfordshire, 1963.Google Scholar

15 Lambert, Royston, Nutrition in Britain, 1950–60, Occasional Papers in Social Administration no. 6, Codicote Press, Welwyn, Hertfordshire, 1964.Google Scholar

16 Financial and Other Circumstances of Retirement Tensioners, Ministry of Pensions and National Insurance, London, 1966.Google Scholar

17 Jordan, op. cit. p. 31.

18 Rodgers, op. cit. p. 71.

19 Pinker, Robert, ‘The Contribution of the Social Scientist in Positive Discrimination Programmes’, Social and Economic Administration, 2:4 (1968), 227–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Titmuss, op. cit. p. 134.

21 Lansley, Stewart and Fiegehen, Guy, Housing Allowances and Inequality, Young Fabian Pamphlet, London, 1973, p. 122Google Scholar

22 Halsey, A. H. (ed.), Educational Priority, Vol. 1, EPA Problems and Policies, HMSO, London, 1972, p. 33.Google Scholar

23 Fifteen to Eighteen (Crowther Report), Central Advisory Council for Education, HMSO, London, 1959.Google Scholar

24 Half Our Future (Newsom Report), Central Advisory Council for Education, HMSO, London, 1963.Google Scholar

25 Higher Education (Robbins Report), Committee on Higher Education, Cmnd 2154, HMSO, London, 1963.Google Scholar

26 Children and Their Primary Schools (Plowden Report), Central Advisory Council for Education, HMSO, London, 1067.Google Scholar

27 Report of the Committee on Housing in Greater London (Milner Holland Report), Ministry of Housing and Local Government, Cmnd 2605, HMSO, London, 1965.Google Scholar

28 Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services (Seebohm Report), Cmnd 3703, HMSO, London, 1968.Google Scholar

29 Children and Their Primary Schools, p. 57.Google Scholar

30 Children and Their Primary Schools.

31 Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services.

32 Home Office Circular no. 91–1972, 10 May 1972.

33 Greve, John, ‘Community Development in the Context of Urban Deprivation’, paper prepared for the European Study Group in Community Development and Urban Deprivation (United Nations Division of Social Affairs), Oxford, September 1973.Google Scholar

34 Jenkins, Roy, What Matters Now, Bantam Books, London, 1972, p. 39.Google Scholar

35 Rose, Stephen M., The Betrayal of the Poor, Schenkman Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1972, p. 84.Google Scholar

36 See for example Sundquist, James L. (ed.), On Fighting Poverty, Basic Books, New York, 1969Google Scholar; and Marris, P. and Rein, M., Dilemmas of Social Reform, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1971, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar

37 Harrington, M., The Other America: Poverty in the United States, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1968.Google Scholar

38 Cloward, Richard and Ohlin, Lloyd, Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs, Free Press, Glencoe, 1960.Google Scholar

39 Marris and Rein, op. cit.

40 See Moynihan, Daniel P., Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding, Free Press, New York, 1969, pp. 132–43Google Scholar; and Kramer, Ralph M., Participation of the Poor, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1969, pp. 263–4.Google Scholar

41 Quoted by William C. Sellover in Sundquist, op. cit. p. 166.

42 Improving the Quality of Urban life, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C., 1965.Google Scholar

43 Marris and Rein, op. cit. p. 262.

44 Moynihan, op. cit. p. 185.

45 Sanford Kravitz, in Sundquist, op. cit. p. 64.

46 Kramer, op. cit. p. 171.

47 Ibid. p. 235.

48 Ibid. p. 267.

48 Warren, Roland L., ‘The Model Cities Program: Assumptions, Experience, Implications’, paper presented at the annual forum program, National Conference on Social Welfare, Dallas, Texas, 17 May 1971, p. 15.Google Scholar

50 Sellover, in Sundquist, op. cit. p. 179.

51 Rose, op. cit. p. 160.

52 Warren, op. cit. p. 11.

53 Warren, Roland L., ‘Community Change: Some Lessons from the Recent Past’, paper presented at the first Louis and Goldstfein Memorial Lecture, School of Social Work, University of Connecticut, 10 April 1973.Google Scholar

54 Moynihan, op. cit. p. 50.

55 Sundquist, op. cit. p. 244.

56 The Times Educational Supplement, 9 February 1973.Google Scholar

57 Wilson, Harold, The Labour Government 1964–1970: A Personal Record, Weidenfeld and Nicolson and Michael Joseph, London, 1971, p. 525.Google Scholar

58 Ibid. p. 526.

59 Rose, E. J. B., in association with Deakin, N., Abrams, M., Jackson, V., Peston, M., Vanags, A. H., Cohen, B., Gaitskell, J. and Ward, P., Colour and Citizenship: A Report on British Race Relations, published for the Institute of Race Relations by Oxford University Press, London, 1969, pp. 200–91.Google Scholar

60 Ibid. pp. 209 and 216.

61 Ibid. pp. 213 and 218.

62 Rex, John, Race, Colonialism and the City, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1973, p. 94.Google Scholar

63 Patricia Homsby-Smith, Junior Minister at the Home Office in 1958, quoted in The Daily Herald, 3 May 1958.Google Scholar

64 Figures from Davison, R. B., Black British, Oxford University Press, London, 1966.Google Scholar

65 Hansard, 5 December 1961, cols 1, 172–3.Google Scholar

66 Rose et al., op. cit. p. 218.

67 Foot, Paul, The Rise of Enoch Powell, Cornmarket Press, London, 1969, p. 34.Google Scholar

68 Hansard, 1 November 1973.Google Scholar

69 Rose et al, op. cit. p. 84.

70 Let's Go with Labour, Labour party manifesto for the 1964 general election, p. 19.Google Scholar

71 Rex, J. and Moore, R., Race, Community and Conflict, Oxford University Press, London, 1971, p. 281.Google Scholar

72 Griffiths, Peter, A Question of Colour?, Leslie Frewin, London, 1966, p. 173.Google Scholar

73 Wilson, op. cit. p. 141.

74 Rose et al., op. cit. p. 229.

75 ‘The Crossman Diaries’, extract in The Sunday Times, 23 February 1975.Google Scholar

76 Rex, op. cit. p. 107.

77 Rose et al, op. cit. p. 606.

78 The Sunday Mercury, 21 May 1965Google Scholar, quoted in Foot, op. cit. p. 79.

79 Rose et al, op. cit. pp. 609–10.

80 The Times, 2 March 1968.Google Scholar

81 Wilson, op. cit. p. 505.

82 Rex, op. cit. p. 95.

83 Daniel, W. W., Racial Discrimination in England, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1968, p. 209.Google Scholar

84 Burney, Elizabeth, Housing on Trial: A Study of Immigrants and Local Government, Oxford University Press, London, 1967.Google Scholar

85 Rex and Moore, op. cit.

86 Immigration from the Commonwealth, Cmnd 2739, HMSO, 1965, para. 42.Google Scholar

87 Cullingworth, op. cit. p. 100.

88 Rex, op. cit. p. 85.

89 Rose et al., op. cit. p. 616.

90 Quoted ibid. p. 622.

91 David Ennals, quoted ibid. p. 614.

92 Titmuss, Richard M., ‘Poverty versus Inequality: Diagnosis’, Nation, 200 (1965), 130–3Google Scholar, reprinted in Roach, Jack L. and Roach, Janet K. (eds), Poverty, Penquin Books, Harmondsworth, 1972, pp. 317–18.Google Scholar