Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T09:45:22.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct and Indirect Measures of Poverty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Stein Ringen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Poverty can be defined and measured either directly (in terms of consumption) or indirectly (in terms of income). The relative deprivation concept of poverty is a direct concept; poverty is understood as visible poverty, that is, a low standard of consumption. The income poverty line is an indirect measure; poverty is established as low income. It is argued that recent mainstream poverty research combines a direct definition and an indirect measure. This causes there to be no logical line of deduction between definition and measurement and, along with other problems in the approach, renders the statistics produced invalid.

Type
Discussion
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 351 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, A.B. (1985), ‘How should we measure poverty?’. Discussion Paper, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Beckerman, W. (1979), Poverty and the Impact of Income Maintenance Programmes, ILO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Coates, K. and Silburn, R. (1970), Poverty: The Forgotten Englishmen, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1981), Final Report. First Programme to Combat Poverty, (Com 81 769), Brussels.Google Scholar
Cmd 6404 (1942). Report on Social Insurance and Allied Services. (Beveridge Report). HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Danziger, S.H., Haveman, R.H. and Plotnick, R. (1986), ‘Antipoverty Policy: Effects on the Poor and the Nonpoor’, in Danziger, S.H. and Weinberg, D.H. (eds). Fighting Poverty, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Desai, M. (1986), ‘Drawing the line: on defining the poverty threshold’, in Golding, P. (ed.). Excluding the Poor. Child Poverty Action Group. London.Google Scholar
Desai, M. and Shah, A. (1985), ‘An econometric approach to the measurement of poverty’, Discussion Paper, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B. (1984), En bok om fattigdom, Studentlitteratur, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Hagenaars, A.J.M. (1986), The Perception of Poverty. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1986), ‘Poverty’, New International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
HEW (1976), The Measure Of Poverty, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington DC.Google Scholar
McLachlan, H.V. (1983), ‘Townsend and the Concept of Poverty’, Social Policy and Administration, 17:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1981). ‘Peter Townsend and the Holy Grail’, New Society, 10 09.Google Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1987), ‘Problems in the definition and measurement of poverty’. Journal of Social Policy, 16:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, S. (1985), ‘Toward a third stage in the measurement of poverty’. Acta Sociologica, 1985:2.Google Scholar
Ringen, S. (1987), The Possibility of Politics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rowntree, S. (1901). Poverty: A Study of Town Life, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Rowntree, S. (1941), Poverty and Progress, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Rowntree, S. and Lavers, G.R. (1951), Poverty and the Welfare State, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1979), ‘Issues in the measurement of poverty’, Scandinavian journal of Economics, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1981), Poverty and Famines, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1983), ‘Poor relatively speaking’, Oxford Economic Papers, 35, 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeeding, T. et al. (1985), ‘Poverty in major industrialized countries’, Luxembourg Income Study (Working Paper No. 2).Google Scholar
Stjerno, S. (1985), Dem moderne fattigdommen, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Supplementary Benefits Commission (SBC) (1979), Annual Report for 1978, Cmnd 7725, HMSO.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom. Penguin, Harmondsworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1986), ‘Paradigms of poverty: a rehabilitation of B.S. Rowntree’, Journal of Social Policy, 15:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar