Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:36:05.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimensions of Financial Autonomy in Low-/Moderate-Income Couples from a Gender Perspective and Implications for Welfare Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2013

FRAN BENNETT  and
SIRIN SUNG
FRAN BENNETT
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER email: [email protected]
SIRIN SUNG
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queens University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast BT7 1LP email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘unitary household’ lives on in policymakers’ assumptions about couples sharing their finances. Yet financial autonomy is seen as a key issue in gender relations, particularly for women. This article draws on evidence from semi-structured individual interviews with men and women in thirty low-/moderate-income couples in Britain. The interviews explored whether financial autonomy had any meaning to these individuals; and, if so, to what extent this was gendered in the sense of there being differences in men's and women's understanding of it. We develop a framework for the investigation of financial autonomy, involving several dimensions: achieving economic independence, having privacy in one's financial affairs and exercising agency in relation to household and/or personal spending. We argue that financial autonomy is a relevant issue for low-/moderate-income couples, and that women are more conscious of tensions between financial togetherness and autonomy due to their greater responsibility for managing togetherness and lower likelihood of achieving financial independence. Policymakers should therefore not discount the aspirations of women in particular for financial autonomy, even in low-/moderate-income couples where there remain significant obstacles to achieving this. Yet plans for welfare reform that rely on means testing and ignore intra-household dynamics in relation to family finances threaten to exacerbate these obstacles and reinforce a unitary family model.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 701 - 719
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, K. J. and Burgoyne, C. B. (2008), ‘Separate financial entities? Beyond categories of money management’, in Burgoyne, C.B. (ed.), special issue on the household economy, Journal of Socio-Economics, 37: 2, 458–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1981), A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, F. (2005), Gender and Benefits, Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.Google Scholar
Bennett, F. (2008), ‘Gender, tax policies and tax reform in comparative perspective’, GeNet Working Paper no. 30, Gender Equality Network (web publication only): www.genet.ac.uk/workpapers/GeNet2008p30.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2013).Google Scholar
Bennett, F. (2012), ‘Universal credit: overview and gender implications’, in Kilkey, M., Ramia, G. and Farnsworth, K. (eds.), Social Policy Review 24: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy 2012, Bristol: The Policy Press, in association with Social Policy Assocation, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Bennett, F., De Henau, H. and Sung, S. (2010), ‘Within-household inequalities across classes? Management and control of money’, in Scott, J., Crompton, R. and Lyonette, C. (eds.), Gender Inequalities in the 21st Century: New Barriers and Continuing Constraints, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 215–41.Google Scholar
Bennett, F., De Henau, J., Himmelweit, S. and Sung, S. (2012), ‘Financial togetherness and autonomy within couples’, in Scott, J., Plagnol, A. and Dex, S. (eds.), Gendered Lives: Inequalities in Production and Reproduction, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 97–122.Google Scholar
Bennett, F. and Sung, S. (forthcoming), ‘Money matters: using qualitative research for policy influencing on gender and welfare reform’, Innovation – the European Journal of Social Science Research.Google Scholar
Bjornberg, U. and Kollind, A.-K. (2005), Individualism and Families: Equality, Autonomy and Togetherness, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blumberg, R. L. (ed.) (1991), Gender, Family and Economy: The Triple Overlap, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoyne, C. B. (ed.) (2008), The Journal of Socio-Economics, special issue on the household economy, 37: 2, 455–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoyne, C. B. and Morison, V. (1997), ‘Money in remarriage: keeping things simple – and separate’, The Sociological Review, 45: 363–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoyne, C. B. and Sonnenberg, S. J. (2009), ‘Financial practices in cohabiting heterosexual couples: a perspective from economic psychology’, in Miles, J. and Probert, R. (eds.), Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
Burgoyne, C. B., Clarke, V., Reibstein, J. and Edmunds, A. (2006), ‘“All my worldly goods I share with you”? Managing money at the transition to heterosexual marriage’, The Sociological Review, 54: 619–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoyne, C., Clarke, V. and Burns, M. (2011), ‘Money management and views of civil partnership in same-sex couples: results from a UK survey of non-heterosexuals’, The Sociological Review, 59: 4, 685–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, M. L., Burgoyne, C. B. and Clarke, V. (2008), ‘Financial affairs? Money management in same-sex relationships’, in Burgoyne, C.B. (ed.), special issue on the household economy, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37: 2, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantillon, S., Gannon, B. and Nolan, B. (2004), Sharing Household Resources: Learning from Non-monetary Indicators, Dublin: Combat Poverty Agency.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A. (2007), ‘Myths to live by? Female solidarity and female autonomy reconsidered’, Development and Change, 38: 1, 149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. and Leonard, M., with assistance from T. Gorman (2002), Against All Odds: Family Life on a Low Income, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration and Combat Poverty Agency.Google Scholar
Dema-Moreno, S. (2009), ‘Behind the negotiations: financial decision-making processes in Spanish dual-income couples’, Feminist Economics, 15: 1, 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1998), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (2010), Universal Credit: Welfare that Works, White Paper, Cm 7957, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (2011), Welfare Reform Bill: Universal Credit – Equality Impact Assessment, London: DWP.Google Scholar
Devine, J., Camfield, L. and Gough, I. (2008), ‘Autonomy or dependence – or both? Perspectives from Bangladesh’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 9: 105–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Equality and Human Rights Commission (2009), Equality Measurement Framework, London: EHRC.Google Scholar
Eroglu, S. (2009), ‘Patterns of income allocation among poor Gecekondu households in Turkey: overt mechanisms and women's secret kitties’, The Sociological Review, 57: 1, 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2006), Roadmap for Equality between Women and Men (2006–2010), CPMM 2006 92, 1 March 2006, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. (1997), The Common Purse: Income Sharing in New Zealand Families, Auckland: Auckland University Press, with Bridget Williams Books.Google Scholar
Goode, J., Callender, C. and Lister, R. (1998), Purse or Wallet? Gender Inequalities and Income Distribution within Families on Benefits, London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Harkness, S. (2008), ‘The household division of labour: changes in families’ allocation of paid and unpaid work’, in Scott, J., Dex, S. and Joshi, H. (eds.), Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Iversen, V. (2003), ‘Intra-household inequality: a challenge for the capability approach?’, Feminist Economics, 9: 2–3, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B. (2012), ‘The low road to Basic Income? Tax-benefit integration in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 41: 1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabeer, N. (1999), ‘Resources, agency, achievement: reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment’, Development and Change, 30: 3, 435–64, cited in Iversen (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E., Rodler, C., Holzl, E. and Meier, K. (2001), Conflict and Decision-Making in Close Relationships: Love, Money and Daily Routines, Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (1992), ‘Gender and the development of welfare regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 2: 3, 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (2001), The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (2006), ‘Perceptions of risk in intimate relationships: the implications for social provision’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 1, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. and Bennett, F. (2004), ‘“Introduction” to themed issue on “gender and individualisation”’, Social Policy and Society, 3: 1, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. and Giullari, S. (2005), ‘The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: the search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach’, Economy and Society, 34: 1, 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2003), Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molloy, D. and Snape, D. (1999), Financial Arrangements of Couples on Benefit: A Review of the Literature, In-house Report 58, London: Department of Social Security.Google Scholar
Morgan, P. (2006), Family Policy, Family Changes: Sweden, Italy and Britain Compared, London: Civitas.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2003), ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice’, Feminist Economics, 9: 2–3, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyman, C. (2003), ‘The social nature of money: meanings of money in Swedish families’, Women's Studies International Forum, 26: 1, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A. S. (1993), ‘Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states’, American Sociological Review, 58: 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A. (2009), ‘Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: an unfinished agenda’, Sociological Theory, 27: 3, 317–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, J. (1989), Money and Marriage, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, J. (1999), Invisible Money: Family Finances in the Electronic Economy, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Pahl, J. (2005), ‘Individualization in couple finances: who pays for the children?’, Social Policy and Society, 4: 4, 381–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, F. (2003), ‘Gender and the foundations of social choice: the role of situated agency’, Feminist Economics, 9: 2–3, 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, S. and Woolley, F. (2006), ‘Control over money and wealth accumulation in Canadian families’, paper for 2005 International Association of Feminist Economists conference, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Price, D. (2011), Key Findings from the Project ‘Behind Closed Doors: Older Couples and the Management of Household Money’, Economic and Social Research Council Seminar Series, London: Institute of Gerontology, King's College London.Google Scholar
Rake, K. and Jayatilaka, G. (2002), Home Truths: An Analysis of Financial Decision Making within the Home, London: Fawcett Society.Google Scholar
Ramm, J., Coleman, L, Glenn, F. and Mansfield, P. (2010), Relationship Difficulties and Help-seeking Behaviour, Research Report DFE-R018, London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
Ribbens McCarthy, J. (2012), ‘The powerful relational language of “family”: togetherness, belonging and personhood’, The Sociological Review, 60: 1, 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J. (1990), Thirty Families: Their Living Standards in Unemployment, Department of Social Security Research Report No. 1, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2003), ‘Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities’, Feminist Economics, 9: 2–3, 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1990), ‘Gender and co-operative conflict’, in Tinker, I. (ed.), Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–49.Google Scholar
Singh, S. and Morley, C. (2011), ‘Gender and financial accounts in marriage’, Journal of Sociology, 47: 3, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, C. (2007), Personal Life, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sonnenberg, S. J. (2008), ‘Household financial organisation and discursive practice: managing money and identity’, in Burgoyne, C. B. (ed.), Journal of Socio-Economics, 37: 2, 533–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, J. (2007), ‘Introduction: the role of money in “doing couple”’, in Stocks, J., Diaz, C. and Hallerod, B. (eds.), Modern Couples Sharing Money, Sharing Life, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, J., Diaz, C. and Hallerod, B. (eds.) (2007), Modern Couples Sharing Money, Sharing Life, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, S. and Bennett, F. (2007), ‘Dealing with money in low- to moderate-income families: insights from individual interviews’, in Clarke, K., Maltby, T. and Kennett, P. (eds.), Social Policy Review 19: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2007, Bristol: The Policy Press, in association with Social Policy Association, pp. 151–73.Google Scholar
Taylor, S., Bennett, F. and Sung, S. (2010), Unequal but ‘Fair’? Housework and Child Care in a Sample of Low- to Moderate-Income British Couples, Barnett Papers in Social Research 2010–4, Oxford: Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Vogler, C., Lyonette, C. and Wiggins, R. D. (2008a), ‘Money, power and spending decisions in intimate relationships’, The Sociological Review, 56: 1, 117–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, C., Brockmann, M. and Wiggins, R. D. (2008b), ‘Managing money in new heterosexual forms of intimate relationships’, in Burgoyne, C.B. (ed.), special issue on the household economy, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37: 2, 552–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1987), ‘Doing gender’, Gender and Society, 1: 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (2002), ‘The presence of feminism in the future of welfare’, Economy and Society, 31: 4, 502–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Women's Budget Group (2006), Women's and Children's Poverty: Making the Links, London: WBG.Google Scholar
Women's Budget Group (WBG) (2012), Submissions to Select Committee on Work and Pensions Inquiry into Universal Credit, www.wbg.org.uk (accessed 15 December 2012).Google Scholar
Yodanis, C. and Lauer, S. (2007), ‘Managing money in marriage: multilevel and cross-national effects of the breadwinner role’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 69: 1307–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar