Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:08:00.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cycling Off and On Welfare in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

ERNIE LIGHTMAN ,
ANDREW MITCHELL  and
DEAN HERD
ERNIE LIGHTMAN*
Affiliation:
SANE Project, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St West, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada
ANDREW MITCHELL
Affiliation:
SANE Project, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St West, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada
DEAN HERD
Affiliation:
SANE Project, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St West, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada
*
email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Internationally, traditional approaches to social assistance (welfare) have increasingly been replaced with ‘active’ labour market policies. Alongside other industrialised countries, Canada embraced this shift, with its emphasis on the ‘shortest route’ to paid employment.

There has been little research on the outcomes of these dramatic changes in Canada, especially longer term. This article explores the post-welfare labour market experiences of people who were on social assistance in Canada in 1996. It uses the longitudinal micro-data files of the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID) from Statistics Canada, which tracks a panel of recipients over five years. We examine the mixing of work and welfare, the transition from welfare to work, and selected labour market indicators – primarily hours of work and wages – that those in receipt of social assistance face in assuming paid work.

Those leaving welfare for work face precarious employment opportunities. Leavers earn lower wages, work fewer hours and consequently have lower annual earnings than non-recipients. Over time the gap narrows but remains significant, even after six years. Returns to welfare are frequent. Overall, even after six years most social assistance recipients remained marginalised in the periphery of the labour market.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 523 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acs, G. and Loprest, P. (2001), Initial Synthesis Report of the Findings from ASPE's ‘Leavers’ Grant, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Ashworth, K., Middleton, S. and Walker, R. (1997b), Income Support Dynamics: Evidence from Administrative Data, CRSP Working Paper 257aS, Loughborough: CRSP.Google Scholar
Ashworth, K., Walker, R., Jenkins, S. and Shaw, A. (1997a), ‘Time spent on income support by unemployed claimants’, in Gregg, P. (ed.), Jobs, Wages and Poverty: Patterns of Persistence in the New Flexible Labour Market, London: CEP.Google Scholar
Bane, M. J. and Ellwood, D. T. (1986), ‘Slipping into and out of poverty: the dynamics of spells’, Journal of Human Resources, 21: 1 (Winter), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, G. and Cragg, M. (1998), ‘An untold story: the characteristics of welfare use in British Columbia’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 31: 1, 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashevkin, S. (2002), Welfare Hot Buttons: Women, Work and Social Policy Reform, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battle, K. and Torjman, S. (1995), How Finance Re-Formed Social Policy, Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Berthoud, R. (2003), Multiple Disadvantage in Employment: A Quantitative Analysis, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Bivand, P., Britton, L., Morrin, M. and Simmonds, D. (2004), Evaluation of Step-Up, Interim Report, London: Department for Work and Pensions Research Report, p. 186.Google Scholar
Blank, R. M. (2002), ‘Evaluating welfare reform in the United States’, Journal of Economic Literature, 40: 4, 1105–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancian, M., Haveman, R., Meyer, D. and Wolfe, B. (2002), ‘Before and after TANF: the economic well-being of women leaving welfare’, Social Service Review, 76: 4, 603–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christophides, L., Stengos, T. and Swindinsky, R. (1998), ‘Welfare participation and labour market behaviour in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 30: 3: 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
City of Toronto (2002), After Ontario Works: A Survey of People Who Left Ontario Works in Toronto in 2001, Toronto: City of Toronto.Google Scholar
City of Toronto (2008), Starting in the Right Place: A New Approach to Employment and Social Services in Toronto, Toronto: City of Toronto.Google Scholar
Daguerre, A. (2004), ‘Importing workfare: policy transfer of social and labour market policies from the USA to Britain under New Labour’, Social Policy and Administration, 38: 1, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. (2003), ‘Reconceptualising welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 3, 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duclos, Y., Fortin, B., Lacroix, G. and Roberge, H. (1999), ‘The dynamics of welfare participation in Quebec’, in Chaykowski, R. and Powell, L. (eds.), Women at Work, Kingston: John Deutsch Institute, Queen's University.Google Scholar
Evans, M., Harkness, S. and Ortiz, R. A. (2004), Lone Parents Cycling between Work and Benefits, Research Report 217, London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Evans, P. M. (1995), ‘Linking welfare to jobs: workfare, Canadian style’, in Sayeed, A. (ed.), Workfare: Does it Work? Is it Fair? Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, pp. 75–104.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, J. B. and de Haan, A. (eds.) (1998), Social Exclusion: An ILO Perspective, International Institute for Labour Studies, Research Series 111, Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Ford, R., Gyarmati, D., Foley, K., Tattrie, D. and Jimenez, L. (2003), Can Work Incentives Pay for Themselves? Final Report on the Self-Sufficiency Project for Welfare Applicants, Ottawa: Social Development Research Corporation.Google Scholar
Frenette, M. and Picot, G. (2003), ‘Life after welfare: the economic well being of welfare leavers in Canada during the 1990s’, Catalogue No. 11–010, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Frenette, M., Green, D. and Picot, G. (2004), ‘Rising income inequality amid the economic recovery of the 1990s: an exploration of three data sources’, Research Paper Series, 11F0019MIE, No. 219, Analytical Studies Branch, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Gray, D. (2003), National Versus Regional Financing and Management of Unemployment and Related Benefits: The Case of Canada, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 14, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Hamilton, G. (2002), ‘Moving people from welfare to work: lessons from the National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies’, Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
Harker, L. (2006), Delivering on Child Poverty: What Would It Take?, A report for the Department for Work and Pensions, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Herd, D. (2002), ‘Rhetoric and retrenchment: Ontario's “common sense” welfare reform’, Benefits, 34: 10, 105–10.Google Scholar
Herd, D. (2006), ‘What next in welfare reform? Preliminary review of promising programs and practices’, a brief prepared for Toronto Social Services, Toronto Social Services Division, Toronto.Google Scholar
Hirst, A., Tarling, R., Lefaucheux, M., Short, C., Rinne, S., McGregor, A., Glass, A., Evans, M. and Simm, C. (2006), Evaluation of Multiple Provider Employment Zones: Early Implementation Issues, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 310, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Holzer, H. and Martinson, K. (2005), ‘Can we improve job retention and advancement among low income working parents?’, IRP Discussion Paper 1307-05, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Human Resources Development Canada (2000), ‘Reconnecting social assistance recipients to the labour market’, Strategic Policy Division, Report No. SPAH123E-03-00.Google Scholar
Institute for Public Policy Research [IPPR] (2008), Nice Work If You Can Get It: Achieving a Sustainable Solution to Low Pay and In-Work Poverty, London: IPPR.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. (2003), ‘Good Jobs in Good Workplaces’: Reflections on Medium-Term Labour Market Challenges, July, Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. and Morissette, R. (2005), ‘Are good jobs disappearing in Canada’, Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2005239e, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Kapsalis, C. (2001), ‘An assessment of EI and SA reporting in SLID’, Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series No. 166, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Lewis, J., Corden, A., Dillon, L., Hill, K., Kellard, K., Sainsbury, R. and Thornton, P. (2005), New Deal for Disabled People: An In-Depth Study of Job Broker Service Delivery, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 246, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Lightman, E., Mitchell, A. and Herd, D. (2005), ‘Welfare to what? After Workfare in Toronto’, International Social Security Review, 58: 4, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodomel, I. and Trickey, H. (eds.) (2001), An Offer You Can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Loprest, P. (2002), Who Returns to Welfare?’ Assessing the New Federalism, B-49, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. (2004), Review of Employment Assistance Programs in Ontario Works and Ontario Disability Support Program, Ontario: Ministry of Community and Social Services.Google Scholar
McKnight, A. (2002), ‘Low-paid work: drip-feeding the poor’, in Hills, J., Grand, J. Le and Piachaud, D. (eds.), Understanding Social Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meadows, P. (2008), Local Initiatives to Help Workless People Find and Keep Paid Work, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. and Cancian, M. (1996), ‘A profile of Wisconsin welfare recipients: baseline data’, Focus, 18: 1, 58–62.Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, C., Tattrie, D., Miller, C., Robins, P. K., Morris, P., Gyarmati, D., Redcross, C., Foley, K. and Ford, R. (2002), Making Work Pay: Final Report on the Self-Sufficiency Project for Long-Term Welfare Recipients, Ottawa: Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Lightman, E. and Herd, D. (2005), ‘Welfare to what? After Ontario Works in Toronto’, International Social Security Review, 58: 4, 95–106.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Lightman, E. and Herd, D. (2007), ‘“Work-first” and immigrants in Toronto’, Social Policy and Society, 6: 3, 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, S. (2002), ‘The insertion model or the workfare model? The transformation of social assistance within Quebec and Canada’, available at www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/pubs/0662323467/200209_0662323467_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Moscovitch, A. (1996), ‘Canada health and social transfer: what was lost?’, Canadian Review of Social Policy/Revue canadienne de politique sociale, 37 (Spring): 66–75.Google Scholar
Nam, Y. (2005), ‘The roles of employment barriers in welfare exits and reentries after welfare reform: event history analyses’, Social Service Review, 79: 2, 268–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Audit Office (2007), Sustainable Employment: Supporting People to Stay in Work and Advance, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services (1998), ‘Survey of individuals who left social assistance’, April.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (1999), The Battle against Exclusion, Volume 3: Social Assistance in Canada and Switzerland, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2002), Employment Outlook, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2005), Policy Brief: From Unemployment to Work, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2006), Boosting Jobs and Incomes: Policy Lessons from Reassessing the OECD Jobs Strategy, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2008), More Than Just Jobs: Workforce Development in a Skills-Based Economy, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pal, L. A. (1983), ‘The fall and rise of developmental UI funds’, Canadian Public Policy, 9: 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2000), ‘“Work first”: workfare and the regulation of contingent labour markets’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24: 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulkingham, J. and Ternowetsky, G. (1999), ‘Neo-liberalism and retrenchment: employment, universality, safety-net provisions and a collapsing Canadian welfare state’, in Broad, D. and Antony, W. (eds.), Citizens or Consumers? Social Policy in a Market Society, Halifax: Fernwood Publishing, pp. 84–98.Google Scholar
Riccio, J. A., Bewley, H., Campbell-Barr, V., Dorsett, R., Hamilton, G., Hoggart, L., Marsh, A., Miller, C., Ray, K. and Vegeris, S. (2008), Implementation and Second-Year Impacts for Lone Parents in the UK: Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Demonstration, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 407, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Saunders, R. (2003), ‘Defining vulnerability in the labour market’, Research Paper W21, Work Network, November, Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Shewell, H. (2001), ‘Almost 12 people an hour leaving welfare: the marketization of welfare in Ontario and the decline of the public good’, in Dixon, J. and Hyde, M. (eds.), The Marketization of Social Security, London: Greenwood, pp. 167–86.Google Scholar
Shragge, E. (1997), Workfare: Ideology for a New Underclass, Toronto: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2003), ‘Labour force historical review 2002’, Catalogue no. 71F0004XCB, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. (1999), ‘The dynamics of low pay and low income’, The National Minimum Wage, Occasional Paper 2, June, Incomes and the Low Paid, Low Pay Commission.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.) (2005), Ideas and Welfare State Reform in Western Europe, London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families [US DHHS] (2002), Characteristics and Financial Circumstances of TANF Recipients, Fiscal Year 1999, Washington, DC: US DHHS.Google Scholar
Urban Institute (2005), Assessing the New Federalism: Eight Years Later, Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Vosko, L. (ed.) (2005), Precarious Employment: Understanding Labour Market Insecurity in Canada, Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. and Greenberg, D. (2005), ‘Determining what works’, in Cebulla, A., Ashworth, K., Greenberg, D. and Walker, R. (eds.), Welfare to Work: New Labour and the US Experience, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar