Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:01:12.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crafting the Financial-Subject: A Qualitative Study of Young Workers’ Experiences in Financialised Pension Investment in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2019

TAT CHOR AU-YEUNG  and
KA KI CHAN
TAT CHOR AU-YEUNG
Affiliation:
Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, UK email: [email protected]
KA KI CHAN
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article applies the concepts of the financial-subject and micro-foundation of financialisation to young workers’ experiences with Hong Kong’s financialised pension regime. The results of our qualitative analysis show that many respondents doubt and belittle their financial investment for retirement. In response to the compulsory investment required by the government and the fact that their aspirations for security in later life seemed unfulfilled, some young workers undertook ‘uninformed’ investment and ‘age-led’ risk taking. The findings also show that employment precarity translates into investment precarity owing to workers’ unstable incomes and contributions; labour inequalities are reflected in financial inequalities. Arguably, the neoliberal crafting of the young financial-subject, including constructions of financial irresponsibility, irrationality, and illiteracy, is fraught with tensions, turning workers into investors and using finance to satisfy socio-economic needs. It contributes to social policy studies by connecting selfhood and institutions, and calls for questions about the future of financialised pensions.

Keywords

Financial-subjectentrepreneurial selfmicro-foundation of financialisationyoung workerspension investmentHong Kong
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 323 - 341
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, R. (2007), Performing Capital: Toward a Cultural Economy of Popular and Global Finance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, C. (2015), ‘Citizenship in a financialised society: financial inclusion and the state before and after the crash’, Policy & Politics, 43, 4, 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkmann, S. (2013), Qualitative Interviewing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bröckling, U. (2015), The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Carruthers, B. G. and Kim, J. C. (2011), ‘The sociology of finance’, Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. K. (2003), ‘Protecting the ageing poor or strengthening the market economy: the case of the Hong Kong Mandatory Provident Fund’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 12, 2, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, K. L. (2009), ‘Retirement income protection in Hong Kong’, in Fu, T. and Hughes, R. (eds.), Ageing in East Asia, London: Routledge,105–122.Google Scholar
Chou, K. L., Yu, K. M., Chan, W. S., Wu, A. M., Zhu, A. Y. and Lou, V. W. (2015), ‘Perceived retirement savings adequacy in Hong Kong: an interdisciplinary financial planning model’, Ageing & Society, 35, 8, 1565–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushen, J. and Thompson, P. (2016), ‘Financialization and value: why labour and the labour process still matter’, Work, Employment and Society, 30, 2, 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, M. (2010), Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (2nd ed.), London: Sage.Google Scholar
Epstein, G. A. (2005), ‘Introduction: financialization and the world economy’, in Epstein, G. A. (ed.), Financialization and the World Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar,3–16.Google Scholar
Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. (2007), ‘The democratization of finance? Promises, outcomes and conditions’, Review of International Political Economy, 14, 4, 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, G. (2018), ‘Saving from poverty: a critical review of individual development accounts’, Critical Social Policy, 38, 2, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, B. (2017), ‘The material and culture of financialisation’, New Political Economy, 22, 4, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, A. (2009), ‘Financialisation, financial literacy and asset-based welfare’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11, 3, 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991), ‘Governmentality’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press,87–104.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2003), ‘Technologies of the self’, in Rabinow, P. and Rose, N. (eds.), The Essential Foucault: Selections from Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, London: The New Press,145–169.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008), The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Froud, J., Leaver, A., Johal, S. and Williams, K. (2006), Financialization and Strategy: Narrative and Numbers, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J. (2014), ‘The search for an ‘asset-effect’: what do we want from asset-based welfare?’Critical Social Policy, 34, 4, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiven, M. (2014), Cultures of Financialization: Fictitious Capital in Popular Culture and Everyday Life, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitlin, S. and Johnson, M. K. (2015), ‘Reconceptualizing agency within the life course: the power of looking ahead’, American Journal of Sociology, 120, 5, 1429–1472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howie, L. and Campbell, P. (2016), ‘Guerrilla selfhood: imagining young people’s entrepreneurial futures’, Journal of Youth Studies, 19, 7, 906–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B. (2008), ‘A cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education’, in Jessop, B., Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (eds.), The Knowledge-based Economy and Higher Education in Europe, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers,13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, M. (2013), ‘Gender, entrepreneurial subjectivity, and pathologies of personal finance’, Social Politics, 20, 2, 242–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. (2006), ‘The entrepreneurial self and “youth at-risk”’, Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 1, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P. (2008), The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapadat, J. (2010), ‘Thematic analysis’, in Mills, A., Durepos, G. and Wiebe, E. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, London: SAGE,926–927.Google Scholar
Lapavitsas, C. (2011), ‘Theorizing financialization’, Work, Employment and Society, 25, 4, 611–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. M., To, B. H. P. and Yu, K. M. (2018), ‘Financialization and economic inequality in Hong Kong: the cost of the finance-led growth regime’, in Fong, B. C. and Lui, T. L. (eds.), Hong Kong 20 Years After the Handover, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciejasz-Światkiewicz, M. (2017), ‘Financial exclusion and rationality of financial behaviour in view of financialization’, in Gemzik-Salwach, A. and Opolski, K. (eds.), Financialization and the Economy, London: Routledge,166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. (2002), Financialization of Daily Life, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Marttila, T. (2018), ‘Neoliberalism, the knowledge-based economy and the entrepreneur as metaphor’, in Cahill, D., Cooper, M., Konings, M. and Primrose, D. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism, London: SAGE,565–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomerie, J. (2008), ‘Bridging the critical divide: global finance, financialisation and contemporary capitalism’, Contemporary Politics, 14, 3, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, N. (2017), ‘Entrepreneurial subjectivity and the political economy of daily life in the time of finance’, European Journal of Social Theory, 20, 2, 216–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oinonen, E. (2018), ‘Under pressure to become-from a student to entrepreneurial self’, Journal of Youth Studies, 21, 10, 1344–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivera, J. and Ponomarenko, V. (2017), ‘Pension insecurity and wellbeing in Europe’, Journal of Social Policy, 46, 3, 517–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, P. (2008), ‘Governmentality and risk’, in Zinn, J. O. (ed.), Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction, Malden: Blackwell Pub, 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, R. (2019), ‘Manufacturing responsibility: the governmentality of behavioural power in social policies’, Social Policy and Society, 18, 1, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, P. J. (2010), ‘Governance and governmentality: a discussion in the context of UK private pension provision’, Economy and Society, 39, 4, 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. (1998), Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowlingson, K. (2002), ‘Private pension planning: the rhetoric of responsibility, the reality of insecurity’, Journal of Social Policy, 31, 4, 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salignac, F., Muir, K. and Wong, J. (2016), ‘Are you really financially excluded if you choose not to be included? Insights from social exclusion, resilience and ecological systems’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 2, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, A. C. (2017), ‘Cultivating the self-reliant and responsible individual: the material culture of financial literacy’, New Political Economy, 22, 4, 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, M. (2018), ‘Sampling and generalization’, in Flick, U. (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection, London: SAGE, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sum, N. L. and Jessop, B. (2014), ‘Sense-and meaning-making in the critique of political economy’, in Jessop, B., Young, B., and Scherrer, C. (eds.), Financial Cultures and Crisis Dynamics, London: Routledge, 27–43.Google Scholar
Tridico, P. (2017), Inequality in Financial Capitalism, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Zwan, N. (2014), ‘Making sense of financialization’, Socio-Economic Review, 12, 1, 99–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdouw, J. J. (2017), ‘The subject who thinks economically? Comparative money subjectivities in neoliberal context’, Journal of Sociology, 53, 3, 523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, M. (2009), ‘Investigating the potentially contradictory microfoundations of financialization’, Economy and Society, 38, 2, 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, R., Watson, D., Ring, P. and Bryce, C. (2014), ‘Pension confusion, uncertainty and trust in Scotland: an empirical analysis’, Journal of Social Policy 43(3): 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T. (2007), ‘Empowerment of whom and for what? Financial literacy education and the new regulation of consumer financial services’, Law & Policy, 29, 2, 226–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, V. and Au-Yeung, T. C. (2018), ‘Expediting youth’s entry into employment whilst overlooking precariousness: Flexi-employability and disciplinary activation in Hong Kong’, Social Policy & Administration, Early View,1–17.Google Scholar
Yu, S. W. K. (2008), ‘Pension reforms in Hong Kong: using residual and collaborative strategies to deal with the government’s financial responsibility in providing retirement protection’, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 20, 4, 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar