Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:10:20.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructing new global models of social security: How international organizations defined the field of social cash transfers in the 2000s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2015

MORITZ VON GLISZCZYNSKI  and
LUTZ LEISERING
MORITZ VON GLISZCZYNSKI
Affiliation:
Community Development Association Lower Saxony (LAG Soziale Brennpunkte Niedersachsen), Hannover, Germany email: [email protected]
LUTZ LEISERING
Affiliation:
Bielefeld University, Faculty of Sociology, Germany email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social cash transfers to the poor have mushroomed in countries of the global South and on global agendas since the 2000s. Around 2000, there was no clear picture if social cash transfers would make it to global agendas. By the end of the 2000s, a repertoire of four models of social cash transfers had been codified by international organizations. Based on an in-depth analysis of all major documents by international organizations and applying a model of ideational change in global arenas, we trace the trajectories of the four models: who developed the models during the 2000s, how were they constructed, and what forces propelled the process? We find that the process was driven by an extension of the domains of international organizations (‘socialization of global politics’) and by an opening of global discourses and development policies to ‘social’ concerns. But organizational domains and global discourses, especially on development, also constrained the concept of social cash transfers, reducing it to four models that reflect a fragmented and incomplete universalism. We conclude that global social policy, conceived as ‘socialization of global politics’, is not a simple ‘uploading’ of ‘social’ ideas from European traditions, but an active process of social construction in global arenas.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 325 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bahle, T., Hubl, V. and Pfeifer, M. (2011), The Last Safety Net: a Handbook of Minimum Income Protection in Europe, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2013), Social Assistance in Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrientos, A. and DeJong, J. (2004), Child Poverty and Cash Transfers – CHIP Report No.4, London: Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. and Lloyd-Sherlock, P. (2002), Non-Contributory Pensions and Social Protection, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Deacon, B., with Hulse, M. and Stubbs, P. (1997), Global Social Policy. International Organizations and the Future of Welfare, London, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, B. (2013), Global Social Policy in the Making. The Foundations of the Social Protection Floor, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Devereux, S. (2001), Social Pensions in Namibia and South Africa (IDS Discussion Paper 379), Sussex: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
DFID (2005), Social Transfers and Chronic Poverty, London: DFID.Google Scholar
DFID (2011), Cash Transfers Evidence Paper, London: DFID.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B. and Garrett, G. (2007), ‘The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?’, Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GTZ (1989), Kaufkrafttransfer an die Ärmsten – Irrweg oder neuer Ansatz?, Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar
GTZ (2005), Social Cash Transfers – Reaching the Poorest, Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1993), ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAI (HelpAge International) (2004), Age and Security – How Social Pensions Deliver Effective Aid to Poor People and their Families, London: HAI.Google Scholar
HAI (2006), Social Cash Transfers for Africa, London: HAI.Google Scholar
HAI and Institute of Development and Policy Management (2003), Non-contributory Pensions and Poverty Prevention – A Comparative Study of Brazil and South Africa. Manchester: Institute of Development and Policy Management.Google Scholar
HAI, Save the Children and Institute for Development Studies (2005), Making Cash Count, London: HAI.Google Scholar
Hanlon, J., Barrientos, A. and Hulme, D. (2010), Just Give Money to the Poor. The Development Revolution from the Global South, Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Hulme, D. (2015), Global Poverty. Global Governance and Poor People in the post-2015 Era. 2nd ed., New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hvinden, B. (2003), ‘The uncertain convergence of disability policies in Western Europe’, Social Policy & Administration, 37, 6, 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO (1952), Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
ILO (2004), Economic security for a better world, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
ILO (2006), Social security for all: Investing in global social and economic development (Issues in Social Protection, Discussion paper 16), Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
ILO (2009), Building Decent Societies – Rethinking the Role of Social Security in Development, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
ILO (2010), Extending Social Security to All – A guide through challenges and options, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
ILO (2011), Report VI – Social security for social justice and a fair globalization. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
ILO (2012), Recommendation 202 ‘Recommendation concerning National Floors of Social Protection’, 14 June 2012. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Kaasch, A. (2013), ‘Contesting contestation: global social policy prescriptions on pensions and health systems’, Global Social Policy, 13: 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. (2011), ‘The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD)’, Human Studies, 34, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künnemann, R. and Leonhard, R. (2008), A Human Rights View of Social Cash Transfers for Achieving the Millennium Development Goals, Bonn/Stuttgart: Brot für die Welt and Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst.Google Scholar
Leisering, L. (2009), ‘Extending social security to the excluded: are social cash transfers to the poor an appropriate way of fighting poverty in developing countries?’, Global Social Policy, 9, 246–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leisering, L., Buhr, P. and Traiser-Diop, U. (2004), ‘Grundsicherung als globale Herausforderung. Soziale Grundsicherungs- und Sozialhilfesysteme in entwickelten, Übergangs- und Entwicklungsländern’, Final Report to GTZ. WP 7, Research Programme SocialWorld, www.uni-bielefeld.de/%28en%29/soz/personen/Leisering/pdf/working%20paper%207.pdf (accessed 20 July 2015).Google Scholar
Leisering, L., Buhr, P. and Traiser-Diop, U. (2006), Soziale Grundsicherung in der Weltgesellschaft. Monetäre Mindestsicherungssysteme in den Ländern des Südens und des Nordens, Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Leisering, L., Davy, U. and Davy, B. (2015), ‘The politics of recognition: changing understandings of human rights, social development and land rights as normative foundation of global social policy’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 18, 565–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W. (2009), World Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noël, A. (2006), ‘The new global politics of poverty’, Global Social Policy, 6, 304–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nullmeier, F. (2006), ‘Politikwissenschaft auf dem Weg zur Diskursanalyse’, in Keller, Reiner (ed.), Handbuch sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse, Wiesbaden: VS, 287–313.Google Scholar
Orenstein, M. A. (2008), Privatizing pensions: the Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform, Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, L. B. (2004), A New Approach to Social Assistance: Latin America's Experience with Conditional Cash Transfer Programs (Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, No. 0416), Washington D.C: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Reutlinger, S. (1988), ‘Efficient alleviation of poverty and hunger’, Food Policy, 13, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roddis, S. and Tzannatos, Z. (1999), Family Allowances (Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 9814), Washington D.C: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Schubert, B. (1985), ‘Reformvorschläge für die Entwicklungshilfe – Eine Rente für die Ärmsten’, Die ZEIT, 04 October 1985.Google Scholar
Schubert, B. (1987), ‘Cash transfers to the poorest – new instruments for a poverty-oriented development aid approach’, Food Policy, 12, 2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, B. (1990), Transfers for Survival – Assessment of the Food Subsidy Scheme as Part of the Social Security System in Mozambique, Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar
Schubert, B. and Balzer, G. (1990), Soziale Sicherungssysteme in Entwicklungsländern – Transfers als sozialpolitischer Ansatz zur Bekämpfung überlebensgefährdender Armut, Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar
Schubert, B. and Antezana, I. (1991), Targeting Cash Transfers to the Urban Destitute of Mozambique - Assessment and Reorganization of the Food-Subsidy-Scheme, Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, N. B. (2011), ‘The diffusion of conditional cash transfer programs in the Americas’, Global Social Policy, 11, 250–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) (2012), Integrated Social Protection Systems – Enhancing Equity for Children, New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
UNICEF, UNAIDS, USAID, The World Bank, Measure DHS, Family Health International, Save the Children (2005), Guide to Monitoring and Evaluation of the National Response for Children Orphaned and Made Vulnerable by HIV/AIDS, New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
UNICEF and ODI (2009), Child Poverty: a Role for Cash Transfers – West and Central Africa, New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
UNICEF, DFID, The World Bank, HAI, IDS, ILO, ODI, Save the Children UK, UNDP, Hope&Homes for Children (2009), Advancing Child-Sensitive Social Protection, http://www.unicef.org/aids/files/CSSP_joint_statement_10.16.09.pdf (accessed 20 July 2015).Google Scholar
Von Gliszczynski, M. (2015), Cash Transfers and Basic Social Protection, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K. (2004), ‘Learning from foreign models in Latin American policy reform’, in ibd. (ed.), Learning from Foreign Models in Latin American Policy Reform, Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1–34.Google Scholar
World Bank (1994), Averting the Old Age Crisis – Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth, New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
World Bank (2008), For Protection and Promotion – The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets, Washington D.C: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2009), Conditional Cash Transfers – Reducing Present and Future Poverty, Washington D.C: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2012), Resilience, Equity and Opportunity – Social Protection and Labor Strategy, Washington D.C: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank/Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office (2001), Brazil - An Assessment of the Bolsa Escola Programs, Washington D.C: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Interviews

Interview 1: Group discussion with Bernd Schubert, development consultant; 07.06.2012, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar