Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:28:30.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community Care and the Family: A Case for Equal Opportunities?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Janet Finch  and
Dulcie Groves
Janet Finch
Affiliation:
Lecturer, Department of Social Administration, University of Lancaster.
Dulcie Groves
Affiliation:
Lecturer, Department of Social Administration, University of Lancaster.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the existence of sex discrimination legislation certain social policies appear to militate against equal opportunities between the sexes. Community care policies are a case in point, especially with current interest shifting towards ‘care by the community’, and the presumed existence of ‘informal caring networks’, with a view to their effective mobilization at a time of cutbacks both in public expenditure and in domiciliary social service provision for groups such as the handicapped and the elderly. To the extent that community care policies rely on women's unpaid domestic labour and may necessitate their withdrawal from the labour market, such policies could be counter-productive to the promotion of ‘equal opportunities’. The challenge is to devise community care policies which do not disadvantage women and which give men ‘equal opportunities’ to take on caring roles usually assigned to women.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1980 , pp. 487 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Equality for Women, Cmnd 5724, HMSO, London, 1974.Google Scholar

2 Land, H. and Parker, R., ‘The United Kingdom’, in Kamerman, S. B. and Katz, A. J., Family Policies: Government and Family in Fourteen Countries, Columbia University Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar

3 See Donnison, D., ‘Feminism's Second Wave and Supplementary Benefits’, Political Quarterly, 49:3 (1978), 271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Titmuss, R. M., Commitment to Welfare, Allen and Unwin, London, 1968, p. 106.Google Scholar

5 Moroney, R. M., The Family and the State, Longman, London, 1976, pp. 51–2.Google Scholar

6 Report of the Committee on the Economic and Financial Problems of the Provision for Old Age, Cmnd 9333, HMSO, London, 1954.Google Scholar

7 See Jones, K., Brown, J. and Bradshaw, J., Issues in Social Policy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Henley-on-Thames, 1978Google Scholar; Sainsbury, E., The Personal Social Services, Pitman, London, 1977Google Scholar; and Bayley, M., Mental Handicap and Community Care, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1973.Google Scholar

8 Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services (Seebohm Report), Cmnd 3703, HMSO, London, 1968.Google Scholar

9 Kushlick, A, ‘The Wessex Experiment: Comprehensive Care for the Mentally Subnormal’, British Hospital Journal and Social Services Review, 6 10 1967.Google Scholar

10 Ministry of Housing and Local Government, Scottish Development Department, and the Welsh Office, People and Planning: Report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning, HMSO, London, 1969.Google Scholar

11 The Voluntary Worker in the Social Services, report of a committee jointly set up by the National Council of Social Service and the National Institute for Social Work Training, under the chairmanship of Aves, Geraldine M., Allen, and Unwin, , London, 1969.Google Scholar

12 Bayley, , Mental Handicap and Community Care.Google Scholar

13 The Future of Voluntary Organisations, report of the Wolfenden Committee, Helm, Croom, London, 1978, p. 15.Google Scholar

14 Bayley, M., Community-Oriented Systems of Care, The Volunteer Centre, Berkhamsted, 1978.Google Scholar

15 Better Services for the Mentally III, Cmnd 6233, HMSO, London, 1975.Google Scholar The target for the provision of day care places is 60 per 100,000 of the population.

16 Parliamentary answer, House of Commons Debates, Vol. 964, cols 468–71.Google Scholar Of the local authorities which provide no day care places, seven had some provision by voluntary bodies in their area and the rest had none at all.

17 See DHSS, Priorities for Health and Personal Social Services in England: A Consultative Document, HMSO, London, 1976.Google ScholarPubMed

18 Ibid..

19 Ibid. para. 1.20.

20 Macintyre, S., ‘Old Age as a Social Problem’, in R. Dingwall, C. Heath, M. Reid and M. Stacey, Health Care and Health Knowledge, Croom Helm, London, 1977.Google Scholar

21 DHSS, Priorities for Health and Personal Social Services in England. Introduction, para. 8.Google Scholar

22 Moroney, op. cit. p. 102.

23 Precise numbers of the elderly in residential accommodation are difficult to cite because of various possible definitions of ‘residential accommodation’ and of ‘elderly’ (which, additionally, may be different for men and women). Estimates of numbers in some form of residential accommodation variously suggest 3 per cent (Moroney, op. cit.); 4.7 per cent ( 1971 CensusGoogle Scholar); and around 5 per cent (Sainsbury, op. cit. ch. 5). The proportion in residential care varies considerably according to age: 3 per cent of those aged from sixty-five to seventy-four, 8 per cent of those aged from seventy-four to eighty-five and 21 per cent of those aged eighty-five or over are estimates based on the 1971 Census.

24 DHSS, Health and Personal Social Services Statistics 1976, HMSO, London, 1977.Google Scholar

25 This was an increase from 221,000 in 1951 to 516,000 in 1976 – Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (OPCS), Demographic Review 1977, HMSO, London, 1978, para. 1.7.Google ScholarPubMed

26 Ibid. para. 1.12.

27 DHSS, Priorities for Health and Personal Social Services in England, ch. 5.Google Scholar

28 Ibid. para. 5.15.

29 DHSS, A Happier Old Age: A Discussion Document on Elderly People in our Society, HMSO, London, 1978.Google Scholar

30 See ‘Women and Chips’, Spare Rib, 83 (1979).Google Scholar

31 House of Lords Debates, Vol. 400, col. 973.

32 Report of the Committee on local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services

33 Ibid. para. 476.

34 Ibid. para. 157.

35 Hadley, R., ‘Retrenchment or Participation: A Choice for the Social Services in Developed Countries’, in Sharma, S. K. (ed.), The Dynamics of Development: An International Perspective, Vol. 2, Concept Publishing Company, Delhi, 1978, p. 524.Google Scholar

36 Titmuss, op. cit. p. 104.

37 Nisbet, R. A., The Sociological Tradition, Heinemann, London, 1967, p. 46.Google Scholar

38 Pearson, G., The Deviant Imagination, Macmillan, London, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 Abrams, P., ‘Community Care: Some Research Problems and Priorities’, Policy and Politics, 6:2 (1977), 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Ibid. pp. 133–4.

41 Ibid. pp. 144–5.

42 Ibid. p. 131.

43 Ibid. p. 134.

44 Bayley, , Mental Handicap and Community Care.Google Scholar

45 Wilson, E., Women and the Welfare State, Tavistock, London, 1977, pp. 89–90.Google Scholar

46 Abrams, op. cit. p. 137.

47 DHSS, Priorities for Health and Personal Social Services in EnglandGoogle Scholar; and DHSS, The Way forward.Google Scholar

48 The invalid care allowance cannot, however, be claimed by married or cohabiting women. See below for further discussion.

49 Land and Parker, op. cit. p. 332.

50 National Children's Homes, Family Life, Occasional Papers no. 1, London, 1979.Google ScholarPubMed

51 Ibid. p. 10.

52 Ibid. p. 7.

53 Callaghan, J., speech to the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, The Guardian, 23 May 1978.Google Scholar

54 Young, Baroness, in Conservative Tarty Conference Debate, 12 October 1977, Conservative and Unionist Central Office, London, p. 78.Google Scholar

55 Report of a speech given by SirHowe, G., The Yorkshire Post, 25 May 1978.Google Scholar

56 Land, H., ‘Who Cares for the Family?’, Journal of Social Policy, 7:3 (1978), 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57 Land and Parker, op. cit. p. 332.

58 Land, , ‘Who Cares for the Family?’, p. 268.Google Scholar

59 This point has been demonstrated very clearly by Hilary Land. See Land, H., ‘Social Security and the Division of Unpaid Work in the Home and Paid Employment in the Labour Market’, Social Security Research, papers presented at a DHSS seminar, 1976, HMSO, London, 1977.Google Scholar

60 See Land, , ‘Who Cares for the Family?’, p. 265.Google Scholar

61 Hunt, A., The Elderly at Home: A Study of People aged 65 and Over Living in the Community in England in 1976, Social Survey Division, OPCS, HMSO, London, 1978, ch. 9.Google Scholar ‘Elderly’ was over sixty-five.

62 In the period 1974–6, a man of sixty-five had a life expectation of 12.4 years, and a woman of sixty-five, 16.4 years – see Table 2.5, ‘Expectation of Life at Selected Ages by Sex’, in OPCS, Demographic Review 1977.Google Scholar

63 An average disparity of three years between elderly husbands and wives is commonly found in statistics collected for pension schemes, but one third of elderly wives were actually older than their husbands at the time of the 1971 Census. See Equal Status for Men and Women in Occupational Pension Schemes, HMSO, London, 1976, pp. 47–8.Google Scholar

64 Social Survey Division, OPCS, General Household Survey 1977, HMSO, London, 1979, Table 2.15, p. 14.Google Scholar

65 Hunt, op. cit. Table 10.9.2; and Section 10.13, p. 83.

66 Bayley, , Mental Handicap and Community Care, ch. 17.Google Scholar

67 Land and Parker, op. cit. p. 355.

68 OPCS, General Household Survey 1977.Google Scholar

69 Report of the Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, Report no. 6, Lower Incomes, Cmnd 7175, HMSO, London, 1978, Tables 173 and 175, pp. 256–7Google Scholar. The figures are for Great Britain.

70 Report of a speech given by Callaghan, J., The Times, 19 June 1978.Google Scholar

71 Better Pensions, Cmnd 5713, HMSO, London, 1974, para. 44.Google Scholar

72 Some change might eventually be enforced, however, through EEC policies on equal status for men and women.

73 Lothian, Lord, House of Lords Debates, Vol. 400, col. 46.Google Scholar

74 DHSS, A Happier Old Age, p. 7.Google Scholar

75 Judge, K., Rationing Social Services, Heinemann, London, 1978, p. 155.Google Scholar

76 Land, , ‘Who Cares for the Family?’, p. 268.Google Scholar

77 Response to the DHSS Discussion Document ‘A Happier Old Age’, Equal Opportunities Commission, Manchester, 1979, p. 9.Google Scholar

78 See House of Lords Debates, Vol. 400, col. 973.

79 Report of a speech, The Daily Mirror, 3 May 1979.Google Scholar

80 OPCS, Demographic Review 1977, ch. 3.Google Scholar

81 Ibid. Section 2.

82 Ibid. para. 7.4.2.

83 Hunt found that most geographical moves made by the elderly were within an area, and that ‘It is comparatively rare for them to move to distant parts of the country’ – Hunt, op. cit. Tables 12.2.2 and 12.2.3.

84 OPCS, Marriage and Divorce Statistics: Review of the Registrar General on Marriages and Divorce in England and Wales, 1975, Series FM2 no. 2, HMSO, London, 1978, Table 1.1a.Google Scholar

85 OPCS, Demographic Review 1977, ch. 5.Google Scholar

86 OPCS, Changing Patterns of Family Formation and Dissolution in England and Wales 1964–76, Studies on Medical and Population Subjects, London, 1979.Google Scholar

87 OPCS, Demographic Review 1977, ch. 5.Google Scholar

88 Among the population of divorced women in the same age group, women aged from thirty to thirty-four remarry at the rate of 184 per 2,000, and women aged from thirty-five to forty-four remarry at the rate of 122 per 1,000 – OPCS, Demographic Review 1977, Table 4.13.Google Scholar

89 See General Household Survey 1977, Tables 4.1 and 4.7, pp. 59–63.Google Scholar

90 See Robertson, J. A. S. and Briggs, J. M., ‘Part-Time Working in Great Britain’, Department of Employment Gazette, 87:7 (1979), 671–7Google Scholar – Table 4, ‘Trends in Part-Time Working 1971–76 Great Britain’.

91 National Council for the Single Woman and Her Dependants, Single Women: Ten Years Later, London, 1975.Google Scholar

92 Department of Employment, New Earnings Survey 1978, HMSO, London, 1979.Google Scholar

93 Land, , ‘Who Cares for the Family?’, p. 269.Google Scholar

94 Hamill, L., Wives as Sole and Joint Breadwinners, Economic Advisers' Office, DHSS, London, 1976.Google Scholar

95 Ibid.

96 Under the Social Security pensions Act 1975, calculations of the state additional pension are based on the ‘best twenty years’ of earnings.

97 See Equal Status for Men and Women in Occupational Pension Schemes, Cmnd 6955, HMSO, 1976, ch. 13Google Scholar – ‘Pension Rights on Divorce and Separation’.

98 Equal Opportunities Commission, op. cit. p. 9.

99 National Council for the Single Woman, op. cit.

100 Equal Opportunities Commission, op. cit. p. 7.

101 Titmuss, op. cit. p. 106.

102 Land and Parker, op. cit. p. 131.

103 Barnes, J. and Connelly, J. (eds), Social Care Research: Report of a DHSS Seminar, Policy Studies Institute, London, 1978, p. 100.Google Scholar