Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:13:43.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perceived Safety of Nicotine and the Use of Nicotine Replacement Products Among Current Smokers in Great Britain: Results From Two National Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Alex Bobak
Affiliation:
Wandsworth Medical Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Saul Shiffman
Affiliation:
Pinney Associates, Pittsburgh, United States of America; University of Pittsburgh, United States of America.
Joseph G. Gitchell
Affiliation:
Pinney Associates, Bethesda, United States of America.
John Bery
Affiliation:
Pathouse Medical Practice, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom.
Stuart G. Ferguson*
Affiliation:
Pinney Associates, Pittsburgh, United States of America; University of Tasmania, Australia; Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Australia. [email protected]
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Stuart Ferguson, School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 26, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia.

Abstract

The hypotheses that smokers hold misconceptions around nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) safety, and that these concerns limit the use of NRT, was tested with two large face-to-face surveys of current smokers in Great Britain in 2004 (N = 605) and 2006 (N = 1,434). In both studies, participants were questioned regarding the safety of nicotine and NRT products, their past experience with NRT and anticipated future use. Across both surveys, approximately two thirds of smokers believed that, or were unsure whether, NRT was as harmful as cigarette smoking. Combining information across surveys, smokers with safety misconceptions reported being less likely to want to quit in the future (63% vs. 73%; p < .001), and, among those who were interested in quitting, were less likely to report an intention to use NRT during their next quit attempt. The majority of smokers were misinformed about the safety of NRT products, and smokers with safety misconceptions were less likely to report that they plan to use NRT during future quit attempts, suggesting that safety concerns are a barrier to NRT utilisation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)