Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:36:42.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cross-sectional study of the relationship of proximal smoking environments and cessation history, plans, and self-efficacy among low-income smokers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2019

Rachel Widome Open the ORCID record for Rachel Widome [Opens in a new window] ,
Patrick J Hammett ,
Anne M Joseph ,
Diana J Burgess ,
Janet L Thomas ,
Jessie E Saul ,
Barbara Clothier  and
Steven S Fu
Rachel Widome*
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, MN,USA
Patrick J Hammett
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, MN,USA Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, MN, USA VA HSR&D Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis VA Health Care System, MN, USA
Anne M Joseph
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, MN, USA
Diana J Burgess
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, MN, USA VA HSR&D Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis VA Health Care System, MN, USA
Janet L Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, MN, USA
Jessie E Saul
Affiliation:
North American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix AZ, USA
Barbara Clothier
Affiliation:
VA HSR&D Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis VA Health Care System, MN, USA
Steven S Fu
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, MN, USA VA HSR&D Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis VA Health Care System, MN, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Rachel Widome, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Proximal environments could facilitate smoking cessation among low-income smokers by making cessation appealing to strive for and tenable.

Aims

We sought to examine how home smoking rules and proximal environmental factors such as other household members' and peers' smoking behaviors and attitudes related to low-income smokers' past quit attempts, readiness, and self-efficacy to quit.

Methods

This analysis used data from Offering Proactive Treatment Intervention (OPT-IN) (randomized control trial of proactive tobacco cessation outreach) baseline survey, which was completed by 2,406 participants in 2011/12. We tested the associations between predictors (home smoking rules and proximal environmental factors) and outcomes (past-year quit attempts, readiness to quit, and quitting self-efficacy).

Results

Smokers who lived in homes with more restrictive household smoking rules, and/or reported having ‘important others’ who would be supportive of their quitting, were more likely to report having made a quit attempt in the past year, had greater readiness to quit, and greater self-efficacy related to quitting.

Conclusions

Adjustments to proximal environments, including strengthening household smoking rules, might encourage cessation even if other household members are smokers.

Keywords

home smoking policylow-income smokerssmoking normssocial environment
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Smoking Cessation , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 229 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019 Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D. B., Niaura, R., Brown, R. A., Emmons, K. M., Goldstein, M. G., & Monti, P. M. (2003). The tobacco dependence treatment handbook: A guide to best practices (Vol. xviii). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Al-Delaimy, W. K., Mills, A. L., Pierce, J. P., Emory, K., Boman, M., Smith, J. et al. (2010). Final summary report of: Two decades of the California tobacco control program:California tobacco survey, 1990–2008. La Jolla, San Diego, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Baha, M., & Le Faou, A.-L. (2010). Smokers’ reasons for quitting in an anti-smoking social context. Public Health, 124(4), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2010.02.011Google Scholar
Baldwin, A. S., Rothman, A. J., Hertel, A. W., Linde, J. A., Jeffery, R. W., Finch, E. A. et al. (2006). Specifying the determinants of the initiation and maintenance of behavior change: An examination of self-efficacy, satisfaction, and smoking cessation. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 25(5), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.626Google Scholar
Benson, F. E., Nagelhout, G. E., Nierkens, V., Willemsen, M. C., & Stronks, K. (2016). Inequalities in the impact of national reimbursement of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy and the influence of injunctive norms: An explorative study. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 10, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.4137/SART.S32225Google Scholar
Biener, L., & Abrams, D. B. (1991). The contemplation ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 10(5), 360–365.Google Scholar
Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., Cummings, K. M., Hyland, A., Anderson, S., & Fong, G. T. (2006). Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Tobacco Control, 15 Suppl 3, iii42–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.012492Google Scholar
Bundy, L. T., Haardörfer, R., Kegler, M. C., Owolabi, S., Berg, C. J., Escoffery, C. et al. (2018). Disseminating a smoke free homes program to low SES households in the US through 2-1-1: Results of a national impact evaluation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty256Google Scholar
Cheng, K.-W., Glantz, S. A., & Lightwood, J. M. (2011). Association between smokefree laws and voluntary smokefree-home rules. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(6), 566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.014Google Scholar
Conklin, C. A., McClernon, F. J., Vella, E. J., Joyce, C. J., Salkeld, R. P., Parzynski, C. S. et al. (2018). Combined smoking cues enhance reactivity and predict immediate subsequent smoking. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty009Google Scholar
Engels, R. C., Knibbe, R. A., Drop, M. J., & de Haan, Y. T. (1997). Homogeneity of cigarette smoking within peer groups: Influence or selection? Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 24(6), 801–811.Google Scholar
Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 653–663.Google Scholar
Farkas, A. J., Gilpin, E. A., Distefan, J. M., & Pierce, J. P. (1999). The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours. Tobacco Control, 8(3), 261–265.Google Scholar
Ferketich, A. K., Wee, A. G., Shultz, J., & Wewers, M. E. (2007). A measure of nicotine dependence for smokeless tobacco users. Addictive Behaviors, 32(9), 1970–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.005Google Scholar
Fu, S. S., van Ryn, M., Burgess, D. J., Nelson, D., Clothier, B., Thomas, J. L. et al. (2014). Proactive tobacco treatment for low income smokers: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 14, 337. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-337Google Scholar
Fu, S. S., van Ryn, M., Nelson, D., Burgess, D. J., Thomas, J. L., Saul, J. et al. (2016). Proactive tobacco treatment offering free nicotine replacement therapy and telephone counselling for socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers: A randomised clinical trial. Thorax, 71(5), 446–453. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207904Google Scholar
Gentzke, A. S., Hyland, A., Kiviniemi, M., & Travers, M. J. (2018). Attitudes and experiences with secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies among subsidised and market-rate multiunit housing residents living in six diverse communities in the USA. Tobacco Control, 27(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053374Google Scholar
Hennessy, M., Bleakley, A., Mallya, G., & Romer, D. (2014). The effect of household smoking bans on household smoking. American Journal of Public Health, 104(4), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301634Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. R., Monge, P. R., Chou, C.-P., & Valente, T. W. (2007). Perceived peer influence and peer selection on adolescent smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 32(8), 1546–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.11.016Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. R., Sussman, S., Unger, J. B., & Valente, T. W. (2006). Peer influences on adolescent cigarette smoking: A theoretical review of the literature. Substance Use & Misuse, 41(1), 103–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080500368892Google Scholar
Homish, G. G., Eiden, R. D., Leonard, K. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (2012). Social-environmental factors related to prenatal smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 37(1), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.09.001Google Scholar
Japuntich, S. J., Leventhal, A. M., Piper, M. E., Bolt, D. M., Roberts, L. J., Fiore, M. C. et al. (2011). Smoker characteristics and smoking-cessation milestones. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.016Google Scholar
Jardin, B. F., & Carpenter, M. J. (2012). Predictors of quit attempts and abstinence among smokers not currently interested in quitting. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14(10), 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts015Google Scholar
Kegler, M. C., Bundy, L., Haardörfer, R., Escoffery, C., Berg, C., Yembra, D. et al. (2015). A minimal intervention to promote smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), 530–537. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302260Google Scholar
Koshy, P., Mackenzie, M., Tappin, D., & Bauld, L. (2010). Smoking cessation during pregnancy: The influence of partners, family and friends on quitters and non-quitters. Health and Social Care in the Community, 18(5), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00926.xGoogle Scholar
Messer, K., Trinidad, D. R., Al-Delaimy, W. K., & Pierce, J. P. (2008). Smoking cessation rates in the United States: A comparison of young adult and older smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 98(2), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.112060Google Scholar
Mullen, P. D., Savas, L. S., Bundy, Ł. T., Haardörfer, R., Hovell, M., Fernández, M. E. et al. (2016). Minimal intervention delivered by 2-1-1 information and referral specialists promotes smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: a Texas generalisation trial. Tobacco Control, 25(Suppl 1), i10–i18. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053045Google Scholar
Park, E. W., Tudiver, F. G., & Campbell, T. (2012). Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD002928. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002928.pub3Google Scholar
Parks, M. J., Kingsbury, J. H., Boyle, R. G., & Evered, S. (2018). Smoke-Free rules in homes and cars Among smokers and nonsmokers in Minnesota. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15, E32. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170355Google Scholar
Phua, J. J. (2013). The reference group perspective for smoking cessation: An examination of the influence of social norms and social identification with reference groups on smoking cessation self-efficacy. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029130Google Scholar
Rees, V. W., Keske, R. R., Blaine, K., Aronstein, D., Gandelman, E., Lora, V. et al. (2014). Factors influencing adoption of and adherence to indoor smoking bans among health disparity communities. American Journal of Public Health, 104(10), 1928–1934. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301735Google Scholar
Rennen, E., Nagelhout, G. E., van den Putte, B., Janssen, E., Mons, U., Guignard, R. et al. (2014). Associations between tobacco control policy awareness, social acceptability of smoking and smoking cessation. Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys. Health Education Research, 29(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyt073Google Scholar
Rostila, M., Almquist, Y. B., Östberg, V., Edling, C., & Rydgren, J. (2013). Social network characteristics and daily smoking among young adults in Sweden. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(12), 6517–6533. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10126517Google Scholar
Schoenaker, D. A. J. M., Brennan, E., Wakefield, M. A., & Durkin, S. J. (2018). Anti-smoking social norms are associated with increased cessation behaviours among lower and higher socioeconomic status smokers: A population-based cohort study. PloS One, 13(12), e0208950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208950Google Scholar
Van Deusen, A., Hyland, A., Travers, M. J., Wang, C., Higbee, C., King, B. A. et al. (2009). Secondhand smoke and particulate matter exposure in the home. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 11(6), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntp018Google Scholar
Vangeli, E., Stapleton, J., Smit, E. S., Borland, R., & West, R. (2011). Predictors of attempts to stop smoking and their success in adult general population samples: A systematic review. Addiction, 106(12), 2110–2121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03565.xGoogle Scholar
Vijayaraghavan, M., Messer, K., White, M. M., & Pierce, J. P. (2013). The effectiveness of cigarette price and smoke-free homes on low-income smokers in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), 2276–2283. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301300Google Scholar
Wamboldt, F. S., Balkissoon, R. C., Rankin, A. E., Szefler, S. J., Hammond, S. K., Glasgow, R. E. et al. (2008). Correlates of household smoking bans in low-income families of children with and without asthma. Family Process, 47(1), 81–94.Google Scholar
Warren, J. R., Okuyemi, K. S., Guo, H., Thomas, J. L., & Ahluwalia, J. S. (2010). Predicting home smoking restrictions among African American light smokers. American Journal of Health Behavior, 34(1), 110–118.Google Scholar
Westmaas, J. L., Bontemps-Jones, J., & Bauer, J. E. (2010). Social support in smoking cessation: Reconciling theory and evidence. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(7), 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq077Google Scholar
Williams, R. S., Stollings, J. H., Bundy, Ł., Haardörfer, R., Kreuter, M. W., Mullen, P. D. et al. (2016). A minimal intervention to promote smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: North Carolina randomized effectiveness trial. PloS One, 11(11), e0165086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165086Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Martinez-Donate, A. P., Kuo, D., Jones, N. R., & Palmersheim, K. A. (2012). Trends in home smoking bans in the USA, 1995–2007: Prevalence, discrepancies and disparities. Tobacco Control, 21(3), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2011.043802Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Martinez-Donate, A. P., Kuo, D., & Piper, M. (2016). Beyond cigarette smoking: Smoke-free home rules and use of alternative tobacco products. Perspectives in Public Health, 136(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913915600194Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Nonnemaker, J., Sherrill, B., Gilsenan, A. W., Coste, F., & West, R. (2009). Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: Factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addictive Behaviors, 34(4), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.11.013Google Scholar