Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:35:01.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A randomised controlled trial of a theory-based interactive internet-based smoking cessation intervention (‘StopAdvisor’): Study protocol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2013

Susan Michie
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training, London, UK
Jamie Brown*
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
Adam W. A. Geraghty
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Sascha Miller
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Lucy Yardley
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Benjamin Gardner
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
Lion Shahab
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
John A. Stapleton
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
Robert West
Affiliation:
National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training, London, UK Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Jamie Brown, Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 53179; Fax: +44 (0)20 7679 8354

Abstract

Background: Internet-based interventions can help smokers to quit compared with brief written materials or no intervention. However, they are not widely used, particularly by more disadvantaged smokers, and there is significant variation in their effectiveness. A new smoking cessation website (‘StopAdvisor’) has been systematically developed on the basis of PRIME theory, empirical evidence, web-design expertise and user-testing with socio-economically disadvantaged smokers. This paper reports the protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of StopAdvisor and determine whether it translates across the social spectrum.

Methods: The trial has two arms with participants randomised to the offer of the interactive ‘StopAdvisor’ website (intervention condition) or a non-interactive, static website (control condition). Participants are adults from the UK, who smoke every day and are willing to make a serious quit attempt within a month of enrolment. At least 4260 participants will be recruited with a minimum of 2130 in each of two socio-economic sub-groups. The intervention comprises a structured quit plan and a variety of theory- and evidence-based behaviour change techniques for smoking cessation. Tailored support is offered in the form of a series of tunnelled sessions and a variety of interactive menus for use up to a month before, and then for one month after quitting (http://www.lifeguideonline.org/player/play/stopadvisordemonstration). The control is a static website that presents brief and standard advice on smoking cessation. Assessments are at baseline and 2-, 4- and 7-months post-enrolment. The primary outcome measure will be Russell Standard 6-months sustained abstinence, defined as self-reported continuous abstinence verified by saliva cotinine or anabasine at 7-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures will include 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 7-month follow-up, self-reported abstinence at 2- and 4-month follow-ups, satisfaction ratings of the website and quantitative indices of website interaction. All analyses will be by intention to treat and the main analysis will compare the two conditions on the primary outcome measure using a logistic regression model, adjusted for baseline characteristics. The efficacy of the intervention across the social spectrum will be assessed by a logistic regression focusing on the interaction between condition and socio-economic disadvantage.

Trial registration: ISRCTN99820519.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aveyard, P., Brown, K., Saunders, C., Alexander, A., Johnstone, E., Munafò, M. R., & Murphy, M. (2007). Weekly versus basic smoking cessation support in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax, 62 (10), 898903. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.071837Google Scholar
Balmford, J., Borland, R., Hammond, D., & Cummings, K. M. (2011). Adherence to and reasons for premature discontinuation from stop-smoking medications: data from the ITC four-country survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 13 (2), 94102. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq215Google Scholar
Brose, L. S., West, R., McDermott, M. S., Fidler, J. A., Croghan, E., & McEwen, A. (2011). What makes for an effective stop-smoking service? Thorax, 66 (10), 924926. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200251Google Scholar
Brown, J., Michie, S., Geraghty, A. W. A., Miller, S., Yardley, L., Gardner, B., . . . West, R. (2012). A pilot study of StopAdvisor: A theory-based interactive internet-based smoking cessation intervention aimed across the social spectrum. Addictive Behaviors, 37 (12), 13651370. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.05.016Google Scholar
Brown, J., Michie, S., Raupach, T., & West, R. (2013). Prevalence and characteristics of smokers interested in internet-based smoking cessation interventions: cross-sectional findings from a national household survey. J Med Internet Res, 15 (3), e50.Google Scholar
Civljak, M., Sheikh, A., Stead Lindsay, F., & Car, J. (2010). Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9). Retrieved from doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub3Google Scholar
Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., Nair, V. N., & Strecher, V. J. (2005). A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med, 30 (1), 6573.Google Scholar
Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Strecher, V. (2007). The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med, 32 (5 Suppl), S112118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, R. (2011). Is it time to start focussing on content of computer-delivered interventions? Addiction, 106 (10), 18711871. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03539.xGoogle Scholar
Department of Health. (2010). NHS Stop Smoking Services – Service and Monitoring Guidance. London.Google Scholar
Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M., DiGuiseppi, C., Pratap, S., Wentz, R., & Kwan, I. (2002). Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ, 324 (7347), 1183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183Google Scholar
Foulds, J., Stapleton, J., Hayward, M., Russell, M., Feyerabend, C., Fleming, T., & Costello, J. (1993). Transdermal nicotine patches with low-intensity support to aid smoking cessation in outpatients in a general hospital. A placebo-controlled trial. Arch Fam Med, 2 (4), 417423.Google Scholar
Free, C., Knight, R., Robertson, S., Whittaker, R., Edwards, P., Zhou, W., . . . Roberts, I. (2011). Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. The Lancet, 378 (9785), 4955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, A. L., Cobb, N. K., Raymond, L., Sill, S., & Young, J. (2007). Effectiveness of an Internet-based worksite smoking cessation intervention at 12 months. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49 (8), 821828. doi: 10.1097/Jom.0b013e3180d09e6fGoogle Scholar
Hyland, A., Borland, R., Li, Q., Yong, H.-H., McNeill, A., Fong, G. T., . . . Cummings, K. M. (2006). Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviours among participants in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control, 15 (suppl 3), iii8394. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013516Google Scholar
Kotz, D., & West, R. (2009). Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it's not in the trying, but in the succeeding. Tob Control, 18 (1), 4346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, B. M. (2008). Updated US smoking cessation guideline advises counseling, combining therapies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299 (23), 27362736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michie, S. (2008). What works and how? Designing more effective interventions needs answers to both questions. Addiction, 103 (6), 886887. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02112.xGoogle Scholar
Michie, S., Brown, J., Geraghty, A., Miller, S., Yardley, L., Gardner, B., . . . West, R. (2012). Development of StopAdvisor: A theory-based interactive internet-based smoking cessation intervention. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2 (3), 263275. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0135-6Google Scholar
Myung, S. K., McDonnell, D. D., Kazinets, G., Seo, H. G., & Moskowitz, J. M. (2009). Effects of web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169 (10), 929937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2006). Brief interventions and referral for smoking cessation in primary care and other settings PHI001. London.Google Scholar
Saul, J. E., Schillo, B. A., Evered, S., Luxenberg, M. G., Kavanaugh, A., Cobb, N., & An, L. C. (2007). Impact of a statewide Internet-based tobacco cessation intervention. Journal of medical internet research, 9 (3), e28. doi: ARTN e28 DOI 10.2196/jmir.9.4.e28Google Scholar
Shafey, O., Erikson, M., Ross, H., & Mackay, J. (2009). The Tobacco Atlas (3rd ed.). Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society.Google Scholar
Shahab, L., & McEwen, A. (2009). Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction, 104 (11), 17921804.Google Scholar
Stoddard, J. L., & Augustson, E. M. (2006). Smokers who use internet and smokers who don't: data from the Health Information and National Trends Survey (HINTS). Nicotine Tob Res, 8 Suppl 1, S7785.Google Scholar
Strecher, V. J. (2008). The Internet: Just another smoking cessation tool? Addiction, 103 (3), 485486. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02144.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strecher, V. J., Shiffman, S., & West, R. (2005). Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction, 100 (5), 682688. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01093.xGoogle Scholar
Swartz, L. H. G., Noell, J. W., Schroeder, S. W., & Ary, D. V. (2006). A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme. Tobacco Control, 15 (1), 712. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006189Google Scholar
West, R. (2006). Theory of Addiction. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
West, R., & Brown, J. (2012). Smoking and Smoking Cessation in England 2011. London. Available from www.smokinginengland.info. http://www.webcitation.org/6ATIwUecr.Google Scholar
West, R., Hajek, P., Stead, L., & Stapleton, J. (2005). Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard. Addiction, 100 (3), 299303.Google Scholar
West, R., & Stapleton, J. A. (2008). Clinical and public health significance of treatments to aid smoking cessation. European Respiratory Review, 17 (110), 199204.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation. (2009). WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic.Google Scholar