Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:05:36.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thirty Years of the ‘Jeweled Style’

Review products

J.ELSNER and J. HERNÁNDEZLOBATO (EDS), THE POETICS OF LATE LATIN LITERATURE. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. 544, illus. isbn9780199355631. £71.00.

S.MCGILL and J.PUCCI (EDS), CLASSICS RENEWED: RECEPTION AND INNOVATION IN THE LATIN POETRY OF LATE ANTIQUITY (Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften. NF 152). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2016. Pp. 432, illus. isbn9783825364489. €48.00.

P. F.MORETTI, R.RICCI and C.TORRE (EDS), CULTURE AND LITERATURE IN LATIN LATE ANTIQUITY: CONTINUITIES AND DISCONTINUITIES (Studi e testi tardoantichi (STTA) 13). Turnhout: Brepols, 2016. Pp. 400, illus. isbn9782503557359. €100.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2019

Cillian O'Hogan*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Extract

In seventh-century Wiltshire, a scholar-monk began to write classicising Latin poetry. In bold terms he describes himself as the first of the Germanic peoples to write Latin poetry (‘neminem nostrae stirpis prosapia genitum et Germanicae gentis cunabulis confotum in huiuscemodi negotio [i.e. poetry] ante nostram mediocritatem tantopere desudasse’). His programmatic statements cite Virgil explicitly, and allude to Prudentius and Sedulius. His is a poetry that sets out a stall for the beginning of something new, but does so by making clear his predecessors. For Aldhelm, as for much of the Middle Ages, the canonical models of Latin poetry included classical Latin authors as well as the Christian Latin poets of Late Antiquity.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. My thanks to Jessica Blum, Michael Dewar, Andrew Faulkner, Duncan MacRae, Peter Thonemann and the readers for JRS. I should state for full disclosure that Catherine Ware (contributor to Classics Renewed and Poetics) supervised my undergraduate thesis, and Michael Herren (contributor to Classics Renewed) was one of my PhD examiners.

References

Bright, D. F. 1987: The Miniature Epic in Vandal Africa, Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Butler, S. 2011: The Matter of the Page: Essays in Search of Ancient and Medieval Authors, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1972: Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cullhed, A. 2015: The Shadow of Creusa: Negotiating Fictionality in Late Antique Latin Literature, Berlin.10.1515/9783110310948Google Scholar
Dempsey, G. T. 2015: Aldhelm of Malmesbury and the Ending of Late Antiquity, Turnhout.10.1484/M.STT-EB.5.112365Google Scholar
Dewar, M. J. 1996: Claudian: Panegyricus de Sexto Consulatu Honorii Augusti, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dolveck, F. 2015: Paulinus Nolanus: Carmina, Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Dykes, A. 2011: Reading Sin in the World: the Hamartigenia of Prudentius and the Vocation of the Responsible Reader, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511791420Google Scholar
Ehwald, R. 1919: Aldhelmi Opera, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Berlin.Google Scholar
Fielding, I. 2014: ‘Elegiac memorial and the martyr as medium in Prudentius’ Peristephanon’, Classical Quarterly 64, 808–20.10.1017/S0009838814000135Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. 1975: ‘Le mélange des genres dans la poésie de Prudence’, in Forma Futuri. Studi in onore del Cardinale Michele Pellegrino, Turin, 755–77.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. 1988: ‘Comment doit-on appliquer la notion de genre littéraire à la littérature latine chrétienne du IVe siècle?’, Philologus 132, 5373.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. 2007: ‘Towards an aesthetic paradigm of Late Antiquity’, Antiquité Tardive 15, 277–84.10.1484/J.AT.2.303123Google Scholar
Formisano, M. 2012: ‘Late Antiquity, new departures’, in Hexter, R. and Townsend, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Latin Literature, Oxford, 509–34.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. 2014: ‘Reading décadence – reception and the subaltern Late Antiquity’, in Formisano and Fuhrer 2014, 716.Google Scholar
Formisano, M., and Fuhrer, T. (eds) 2014: Décadence: ‘Decline and Fall’ or ‘Other Antiquity’? Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Fowden, G. 2014: Before and After Muhammad: the First Millennium Refocused, Princeton.10.1515/9781400848164Google Scholar
Fux, P.-Y. 2003: Les sept passions de Prudence (Peristephanon 2.5.9. 11–14). Introduction générale et commentaire, Fribourg.Google Scholar
Fux, P.-Y. 2013: Prudence et les martyrs. Hymnes et tragédie: Peristephanon 1, 3–4, 6–8, 10: commentaire, FribourgGoogle Scholar
Gnilka, C. 1984: Chrêsis. Die Methode der Kirchenväter im Umgang mit der antiken Kultur, 2 vols, Basel.Google Scholar
Green, R. P. H. 1991: The Works of Ausonius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2017: ‘How Prudentian is the Aeneid?’, Dictynna 14, np.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2007: Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203581.001.0001Google Scholar
Hernández Lobato, J. 2012: Vel Apolline muto. Estética y poética de la Antigüedad tardía, Bern.10.3726/978-3-0351-0397-7Google Scholar
Herzog, R., and Schmidt, P. L. (eds) 1989: Restauration und Erneuerung. Die lateinische Literatur von 284 bis 374 n.Chr., Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike, V, Munich.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998: Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, H. 2006: Dracontius, Romul. 10 (Medea), Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kuhn-Treichel, T. 2016: Die ‘Alethia’ des Claudius Marius Victorius. Bibeldichtung zwischen Epos und Lehrgedicht, Berlin.10.1515/9783110516333Google Scholar
Malamud, M. A. 1989: A Poetics of Transformation: Prudentius and Classical Mythology, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. A. 2011: The Origin of Sin: An English Translation of the Hamartigenia, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 1993: Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mastrangelo, M. 2009: ‘The decline of poetry in the fourth-century West’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 16, 311–29.10.1007/s12138-009-0131-5Google Scholar
McBrine, P. 2017: Biblical Epics in Late Antiquity and Anglo-Saxon England, Toronto.10.3138/9781487514280Google Scholar
McCutcheon, R. W. 2015: ‘Silent reading in antiquity and the future history of the book’, Book History 18, 132.10.1353/bh.2015.0011Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. 1989: ‘Ausonius’ “late-antique” poetics and “post-modern” literary theory’, Ramus 19, 2650.10.1017/S0048671X00002940Google Scholar
O'Hogan, C. 2016: Prudentius and the Landscapes of Late Antiquity, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198749226.001.0001Google Scholar
Orchard, A. 1994: The Poetic Art of Aldhelm, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511597558Google Scholar
Otten, W., and Pollmann, K. (eds) 2007: Poetry and Exegesis in Premodern Latin Christianity: The Encounter Between Classical and Christian Strategies of Interpretation, Leiden.Google Scholar
Palmer, A.-M. 1989: Prudentius on the Martyrs, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. 2014: The Space that Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Putter, A. 2018: ‘Versifications of the book of Jonah: late antique to late medieval’, in Schottenius Cullhed and Malm 2018, 183203.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. 1989: The Jeweled Style: Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ross, J. 1995: ‘Dynamic writing and martyrs’ bodies in Prudentius’ Peristephanon’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 3, 325–55.10.1353/earl.0.0072Google Scholar
Schottenius Cullhed, S., and Malm, M. (eds) 2018: Reading Late Antiquity, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. 2009: ‘Literature, history, periodization, and the pleasures of the Latin literary history of Late Antiquity’, History Compass 7, 917–54.10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00602.xGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1999: Reading Virgil and his Texts: Studies in Intertextuality, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Thraede, K. 1962: ‘Epos’, in Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum V, Stuttgart, 9831042Google Scholar
Vessey, M. 2007: ‘Quid facit cum Horatio Hieronymus? Christian Latin poetry and scriptural poetics’, in Otten and Pollmann 2007, 29–48.Google Scholar
Vessey, M. 2014: ‘Literary history: a fourth-century invention?’, in Hoof, L. Van and Nuffelen, P. Van (eds), Literature and Society in the Fourth Century AD, Leiden, 1630.Google Scholar
Vessey, M. 2015: ‘Literature, histories, Latin Late Antiquity: the state of a question’, in Stenger, J. (ed.), Spätantike Konzeptionen von Literatur, Heidelberg, 1931.Google Scholar
Vest, E. B. 1932: Prudentius in the Middle Ages, unpub. PhD thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
van Waarden, J. A., and Kelly, G. (eds) 2013: New Approaches to Sidonius Apollinaris, Leuven.Google Scholar
Ware, C. 2012: Claudian and the Roman Epic Tradition, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139004152Google Scholar
Wasyl, A. M. 2011: Genres Rediscovered, Kraków.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 2017: Blossius Aemilius Dracontius: Carmina Profana, Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, Berlin.10.1515/9783110527537Google Scholar