Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:43:35.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tertullian's Chameleon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2019

Blake Leyerle
Blake Leyerle*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tertullian's treatise De pallio is the briefest and most difficult of the North African's works. Its purpose, ostensibly, is to advocate for a change in clothing from the toga to the pallium. This sartorial shift functions, in turn, as a metaphor for conversion to the philosophical life, which, at the end of the treatise, is revealed to be the Christian life. Towards the centre of the work, Tertullian turns to nature to support his argument, citing the example of five different animals. This essay analyses his description of the chameleon, arguing that it is a riddle: drawing on the natural historians, Tertullian paints a realistic picture of the small lizard, but at the same time, skews the description of these features to depict the philosopher. The purpose of this central sketch is to alert listeners to the nature of the speech as a guessing game, and to point to the complex identity of the speaker.

Keywords

Tertullianpalliumanimal lorerhetoricriddlephilosopher
Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 109 , November 2019 , pp. 275 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this paper were given at the annual meetings of the Society of Biblical Literature in 2017 and of the North American Patristics Society in 2018, and I thank those audiences for their interest and encouragement. I also offer thanks to the Editor and to the anonymous readers of JRS for their generous, yet exacting comments. It is a pleasure to acknowledge how greatly I benefited from their suggestions on many specific points as well as on the argument as a whole. My greatest debt of gratitude is to Patrick Martin, who first introduced me to the work of Michael Riffaterre and then cheerfully read multiple drafts of this essay.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barnes, T. D. 1971: Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1976: ‘Tertullian the Antiquarian’, Studia Patristica 14, 3–20.Google Scholar
Baroin, C. and Valette-Cagnac, E. 2007: ‘S'habiller et se déshabiller en Grèce et à Rome (III). Quand les Romains s'habillaient à la grecque ou les divers usages du pallium’, Revue historique 643, 517–51.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. 2014: ‘Wondrous animals in classical antiquity’, in Campbell, G. L. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life, Oxford, 414–40.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2014: Laughter in Ancient Rome: On Joking, Tickling, and Cracking Up, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Blake, S. 2011: ‘Martial's natural history: the xenia and apophoreta and Pliny's Encyclopedia’, Arethusa 44, 353–77.Google Scholar
Borthwick, E. K. 1970: ‘The riddle of the tortoise and the lyre’, Music and Letters 51, 373–87.Google Scholar
Branham, R. B. 1993: ‘Authorizing humour: Lucian's Demonax and Cynic rhetoric’, Semeia 64, 33–48.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. 2008: ‘Tertullian's De Pallio and Roman dress in North Africa’, in Edmondson, J. and Keith, A. (eds), Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, Toronto, 257–70.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 2001: ‘Reflections on the African character of Apuleius’, in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 47–54.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1995: Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, trans. Chase, M., Oxford.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. D. 1931: Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hunink, V. 2005: De Pallio: A Commentary, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. M. 2000: Understanding Early Christian Art, London and New York.Google Scholar
Kwapisz, J., Petrain, D. and Szymański, M. (eds) 2013: The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry, Berlin.Google Scholar
Leyerle, B. forthcoming: ‘Animal riddles in Tertullian’, in Clark, E. A. and Smith, Z. (eds), Essays in Memory of Maureen Tilley, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
López Cruces, J. L. 2018: ‘A heavenly son of Zeus (Diog. Laert. 6.76 = Cercidas, fr. 54 Livrea)’, Classical Quarterly 68, 91–6.10.1017/S0009838818000046Google Scholar
Luz, C. 2013: ‘What has it got in its poketses? Or, what makes a riddle a riddle?’ in Kwapisz et al. 2013, 83–99.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2003: Pacuvius, Summus Tragicus Poet. Zum dramatischen Profil seier Tragödien, Munich.Google Scholar
McKechnie, P. 1992: ‘Tertullian's De pallio and life in Roman Carthage’, Prudentia 24, 44–66.Google Scholar
Mensch, P. 2018: Lives of the Eminent Philosophers by Diogenes Laertius, ed. Miller, J., Oxford.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1898: Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance Vol. 2, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pappas, A. 2013: ‘The treachery of verbal images: viewing the Greek technopaegnia’, in Kwapisz et al. 2013, 199–224.Google Scholar
Ponge, F. 1961: Le grand recueil, 3. Pièces, Paris.Google Scholar
Potamiti, A. 2015: ‘γρίφους παίζειν: playing at riddles in Greek’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 55, 133–53.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M. 1974: ‘The poetic functions of intertextual humor’, Romantic Review 1, 278–93.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M. 1978: Semiotics of Poetry, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, K. 2010: ‘The logoi of philosophers in Lucian of Samosata’, Classical Antiquity 29, 250–77.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1985: The Annals of Quintus Ennius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thelwall, S. (trans.) 1885: ‘On the pallium’, in Coxe, A. C., Donaldson, J. and Roberts, A. (eds), Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 4, Grand Rapids, MI, 5–13.Google Scholar
Tränkle, H. 1997: ‘Q Septimius Florens Tertullianus’, in Sallmann, K. (ed.), Die Literatur des Umbruchs von der römischen zur christlichen Literatur, 117 bis 284 n. Chr. Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike 4, Munich, 438–511.Google Scholar
Turcan, M. (ed.) 2007: Tertullien. Le Manteau (De Pallio), Sources Chrétiennes 513, Paris.Google Scholar
Urbano, A. P. 2014: ‘Sizing up the philosopher's cloak: Christian verbal and visual representations of the tribōn’, in Upson-Saia, K., Daniel-Hughes, C. and Batten, A. J. (eds), Dressing Judaeans and Christians in Antiquity, Farnham and Burlington, VT, 175–94.Google Scholar
Urbano, A. P. 2016: ‘The philosopher type in late Roman art: problematizing cultural appropriation in light of cultural competition’, in DesRosiers, N. P. and Vuong, L. C. (eds), Religious Competition in the Greco-Roman World, Atlanta, GA, 27–40.Google Scholar
van den Hout, M. P. J. 1988: M. Cornelii Frontonis Epistulae, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2008: Demons and Dancers: Performance in Late Antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilhite, D. E. 2007: Tertullian the African: An Anthropological Reading of Tertullian's Context and Identities, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wyles, R. 2008: ‘The symbolism of costume in ancient pantomime’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds), New Directions in Ancient Pantomime, Oxford, 61–87.Google Scholar