Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:44:12.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Study of the ‘Persecutions’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Hugh Last
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The relations between the Empire and the Church are a subject of such major interest, which has attracted so much attention from historians both ecclesiastical and lay, that it would be rash to suppose anything relevant and of value still to remain unsaid. Nevertheless, if it be permissible to think that the most familiar accounts are not the most satisfactory, some service may be done by emphasizing again certain considerations which, though they have not completely escaped notice hitherto, have too often been overlooked; and for such an undertaking the present occasion is perhaps made appropriate by the interest in early Christian history which the scholar whom we honour has combined with his studies of pagan Rome.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 1: Papers Presented to Sir Henry Stuart Jones , 1937 , pp. 80 - 92
Copyright
Copyright ©Hugh Last 1937. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Religious Experience of the Roman People (London, 1911), 2Google Scholar.

2 HZ lxiv, 1890, 389 ff.Google Scholar [Ges. Schr. iii, 389 ff.].

3 HZ cit. 390 [Ges. Schr. iii, 390]; Strafrecht 570.

4 HZ cit. 397 [Ges. Schr. iii, 395]; Strafrecht 571.

5 HZ cit. 407 [Ges. Schr. iii, 404].

6 HZ cit. 396 f. [Ges. Schr. iii, 395].

7 Strafrecht 574, n. 3.

8 Suet. Dom. 12, 2.

9 HZ cit. 397, n. 1 [Ges. Schr. iii, 395, n. 2].

10 Apol. 46, 4.

11 HZ cit. 393 [Ges. Schr. iii, 392]; Strafrecht 56.

12 HZ cit. 413 f. [Ges. Schr. iii, 409 f.]

13 Livy xxxix, 16, 7.

14 Essays in Jurisprudence and Ethics (London, 1882), 144 ff.Google Scholar

15 Tert. Apol. 40, 2.

16 Op. cit. 147 f.

17 Schmidt, L., Die Ethik der alten Griechen (Berlin, 1882), ii, 15 ff.Google Scholar

18 Op. cit. 159 f.

19 Augustine, , de ciu. Dei, iv, 27Google Scholar.

20 26 Harwell's State Trials, col. 718.

21 Ann. iii, 24, 3.

22 Cf. Mommsen, Strafrecht, 567, n. 3.

23 See e.g. Horace, Carm. saec. 17 ff.; cf. Fowler, W. Warde, Roman Ideas of Deity (London, 1914), 152Google Scholar.

24 Cic. de nat. deorum ii, 8.

25 Cic. de legg. ii, 19.

26 iv, 30, 7 ff.

27 ‘Ne qui nisi Romani di neu quo alio more quam patrio colerentur.’

28 ‘Quibus quaestui sunt capti superstitione animi.’

29 xxv, 1, 6 ff.

30 Dion. Hal. Ant. ii, 19, 4 f.Google Scholar; cf. Val. Max. vii, 7, 6.

31 Hermes lxxi, 1936, 275 ff.Google Scholar: cf. S. Reinach, Cultes, mythes et religions, iii (Paris, 1908), 256 ff.

32 De legg. ii, 37.

33 In Augustine, de ciu. Dei vi, 9Google Scholar.

34 xxxix, 8, 4–7.

35 Cf. Farnell, , The Cults of the Greek States, v (Oxford, 1909), 161 ff.Google Scholar and notes on p. 304.

36 Mommsen, , Staatsrecht, ii3, 375 ffGoogle Scholar.

37 Histoire romaine, ii: la république romaine de 133 à 44 avant J.-C. (Paris, 1936). 52Google Scholar.

38 L'impero romano e il Cristianesimo (Turin, 1914), 32Google Scholar.

39 Ann. ep. 1933, 4Google Scholar: AJA 1933, 215 ff.Google Scholar

40 ILS 18, ll. 7 ff.

4l HZ cit. 405 f. [Ges. Schr. iii, 402 f.].

42 864, n. 1.

43 Val. Max. i, 3, 3 (Nep.).

44 Ibid. (Par.).

45 Ibid.

46 Cf. Cumont, , Les religions orientales dans le pagánisme romain4 (Paris, 1929), 306 n. 25Google Scholar.

47 Asconius, p. 21 B.

48 Cf. Bloch, G., ‘M. Aemilius Scaurus’ (Mélanges d'histoire ancienne—Paris, 1909), 38 n. 3Google Scholar.

49 Mommsen, Staatsrecht, ii3, 322 n. 1.

50 Jos. AJ xviii, 65 ff.Google Scholar

51 xlii, 26, 2.

52 Octavius, 6, 3.

53 xlvii, 18, 4 f.

54 Cassius Dio, liii, 2, 4; cf. liv, 6, 6.

55 Pliny, NH xxx, 13Google Scholar.

56 Suet. Div. Claud. 25, 5Google Scholar. Cf. Caesar, BG vi, 16Google Scholar; Diodorus v, 31, 3 and Strabo 198—? both Posidonius; Pliny, loc. cit.; Tac. Ann. xiv, 30, 3Google Scholar.

57 See p. 87, n. 50.

58 Jos. AJ xviii, 65 ff.Google Scholar; Tac. Ann. (where the context should be noticed).

59 lx, 6, 6.

60 vii, 6, 15.

61 Div. Claud. 25, 4.

62 Ann. xv, 44, 3.

63 Critical and Historical Essays (London, 1854) i, 54Google Scholar (on Hallam's Constitutional History).

64 See, for instance, Waltzing, J. P., Le crime rituel reproché aux Chrétiens du iie siècle (Brussels, 1925)Google Scholar.

65 See, for instance, Justin, I Apol. 7.

66 The Church in the Roman Empire (London, 1897), 256 ff.Google Scholar

67 Ges. Schr. vi, 544.

68 Apol. 5, 7.

69 Henderson, B. W., Five Roman Emperors (Cambridge, 1927), 49Google Scholar.

70 Styger, P., Die römischen Katakomben (Berlin, 1933), 63 ff., 100 ff.Google Scholar

71 Sulp. Sev. Chron. ii, 30. 7.

72 See, for instance, Parkes, J., The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue (London, 1934). 77 ff.Google Scholar

73 Suet. Dom. 12, 2Google Scholar.

74 Ep. ad Tiai. 96 (97), 5.

75 HE iv, 9 [Justin, I Apol. 68].

76 Leipzig, 1897.

77 Some suggestive comments on the views here expressed, provoked by a summary communicated to the Société des Études latines in Paris on December 12, 1936, will be found in the Revue des Études latines xiv, 1936, 2, 230 ff.Google Scholar