Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:55:42.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seneca's Scientific Fictions: Models as Fictions in the Natural Questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2014

Courtney Ann Roby*
Affiliation:
Cornell University

Abstract

Seneca's Naturales Quaestiones explains the causes and functional mechanisms of natural phenomena, from common sights like rainbows to exotically out-of-reach ones like comets. The vividness with which he brings them all within the reader's grasp is certainly a literary feat as much as a scientific one, but the rhetorical power of his explanations does not cost them their epistemological validity. Analyses drawn from current philosophy of science reveal elements of fictionality omnipresent in scientific models and experiments, suggesting an approach to Seneca's ‘scientific fictions’ not as failed analogies but as a sophisticated expansion of the tradition of analogical scientific explanation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alexander, W. H. 1955: ‘Change of color in moribund fishes (Seneca, Nat. Quaest. 3.17–18)’, The Classical Weekly 48, no. 14, 192–3Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. 1989: Sapientiae facies: étude sur les images de Sénèque, ParisGoogle Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. 2001: ‘L'imaginaire analogique et la construction du savoir dans les Questions Naturelles de Sénèque’, in Courrént, M. and Thomas, J. (eds), Imaginaire et modes de construction du savoir antique dans les textes scientifiques et techniques, Perpignan, 155–74Google Scholar
Barberousse, A., and Ludwig, P. 2009: ‘Models as fictions’, in Suárez 2009, 56–73Google Scholar
Barton, C. A. 1993: The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Blanché, R. 1973: Le raisonnement, ParisGoogle Scholar
Bokulich, A. 2009: ‘Explanatory fictions’, in Suárez 2009, 91–109Google Scholar
Boon, M., and Knuuttila, T. 2011: ‘Breaking up with the epochal break: the case of engineering sciences’, in Nordmann, A., Radder, H. and Schiemann, G. (eds), Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break, Pittsburgh, Pa., 6679Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. 2001: ‘First, we assume a spherical cow …’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, no. 4, 656–7Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. 1983: How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. 1989: Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Chadarevian, S. de, and Hopwood, N. 2004: Models: The Third Dimension of Science, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1994: Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny's Encyclopedia, Baltimore, MdGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, L. 1967: ‘Empiricism and skepticism in the teaching of the Greek empiricist school’, in Temkin, O. and Temkin, C. L. (eds), Ancient Medicine; Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein, Baltimore, Md, 349–66Google Scholar
Elgin, C. 2009: ‘Exemplification, idealization, and scientific understanding’, in Suárez 2009, 77–90Google Scholar
Giere, R. N. 2004: ‘How models are used to represent reality’, Philosophy of Science 71, no. 5, 742–52Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. R. 2008: ‘The status of models in ancient and medieval astronomy’, Centaurus: International Magazine of the History of Mathematics, Science, and Technology 50, 168–83Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 1983: Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. 1992: ‘The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences’, in Pickering, A. (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago, 2964Google Scholar
Harré, R. 1970: The Principles of Scientific Thinking, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. 1965: Aspects of Scientific Explanation, and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Hine, H. M. 1996: Studies in the Text of Seneca's “Naturales Quaestiones”, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. 2010: The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. I. G. 1997: ‘Models and representation’, Philosophy of Science 64 (December 1, 1997), S325S336Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. 2012: Models, Simulations, and Representations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. 2005: ‘God and human knowledge in Seneca's Natural Questions’, in Inwood, B., Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome, Oxford, 157200Google Scholar
Knuuttila, T. 2005: ‘Models, representation, and mediation’, Philosophy of Science 72, no. 5, 1260–71Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. 2010: Naturgesetz in der Vorstellung der Antike, besonders der Stoa: eine Begriffsuntersuchung, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Kyle, D. G. 1998: Spectacles of Death in Ancient Rome, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1988: The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Lehoux, D. 2012: What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Lehoux, D. 2013: ‘Seeing and unseeing, seen and unseen’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, Oxford, 131–51Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966: Polarity and Analogy; Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Morrison, M. 2009: ‘Fictions, representations, and reality’, in Suárez 2009, 110–38Google Scholar
Norton Wise, M. 2006: ‘Making Visible’, Isis 97, no. 1 (March 1, 2006), 7582Google Scholar
Payne, M. 2007: Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Platt, V. J. 2011: Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rouse, J. 1987: Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Rouse, J. 2009: ‘Laboratory fictions’, in Suárez 2009, 37–55Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. 1984: Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Seneca 1996: L. Annaei Senecae Naturalium quaestionum libros (Ed. Hine, H. M.), StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Seneca 2010: Natural Questions (Trans. Hine, H. M.), ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Suárez, M. 2004: ‘An inferential conception of scientific representation’, Philosophy of Science 71, no. 5, 767–79Google Scholar
Suárez, M. (ed.) 2009: Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Taub, L. C. 2003: Ancient Meteorology, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
von Staden, H. 1975: ‘Experiment and experience in Hellenistic medicine’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 22, no. 1, 178–99Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1994: ‘Author and authority: Celsus on the construction of a scientific self’, in Vázquez Buján, M. E. (ed.), Tradición e innovación de la medicina latina de la antigüedad y de la alta edad media: actas del IV Coloquio Internacional sobre los “Textos Médicos Latinos Antiguos”, Santiago de Compostela, 103–17Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2009: Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice, Farnham/Burlington, VTGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. 2005: ‘Interactions: physics, morality, and narrative in Seneca Natural Questions 1’, Classical Philology 100, no. 3, 142–65Google Scholar
Williams, G. 2007: ‘Seneca on comets and ancient cometary theory in Natural Questions 7’, Ramus: Critical Studies in Greek and Roman Literature 36, no. 2, 97117Google Scholar
Williams, G. 2012: The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca's Natural Questions, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. 2003: Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar