Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:33:56.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Senate's Story*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2012

Miriam Griffin
Affiliation:
Somerville and Trinity Colleges, Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Miriam Griffin 1997. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Of the textual problems, the ones that raise questions of historical significance are: 1. 33 where the editors (59) decide for the ‘quod adlegt. pro cos.’ of Copy B over ‘quo adleg. pro cos.’ of Copy A; 1. 87 where <civitates> vel. sim. has to be supplied (62); 1. 125 where <eius indicis> has been supplied, but other possibilities for the phrase are suggested (64). On the singular verb in 1. 169, see below (III).

2 My fellow translators on that occasion were Barbara Levick, Andrew Lintott, Fergus Millar, Greg Rowe, and David Stockton.

3 I am indebted to Peter Brunt and Umberto Laffi for help with this section, which is intended as a preliminary sketch of the issue.