Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2012
Until recent years, Roman art had not seriously engaged the attention of the historians of art. It had been regarded as a sort of supplementary chapter to Greek art. In his great history of Greek sculpture Overbeck had inserted two or three chapters on the monuments of the Roman age. Collignon in France and Ernest Gardner in England in their works on Greek sculpture only briefly touched on the sculptural monuments of Rome.
page 4 note 1 Friedländer, , Sittengeschichte Roms, iii, p. 216Google Scholar.
page 7 note 1 7, 196; V, 194.
page 8 note 1 Die antiken ∣ Schriftquellen zur Geschichte der bildenden Künste, pp. 429-466. Compare Brunn, Geschichte der griech. Künstler, ed. 2. To these works I refer for authorities.
page 9 note 1 Gesch. der griech. Künstler, ii, 211.
page 10 note 1 Nat. Hist. xxxv, 116. S. Tadius is another reading: the text seems hopelessly corrupt.
page 10 note 2 Antiquities of Ionia, part v, p. 36.
page 11 note 1 Perhaps Mr. Lethaby meant rather ‘in architecture.’
page 15 note 1 Roman Art, p. 17.
page 15 note 1 If any reader thinks this view of Etruscan art too unfavourable, he should compare the remarks on it made by an excellent judge, Dr. Amelung, in his Führer durch die Antiken in Florenz, p. 161.
page 17 note 1 p. 58.
page 22 note 1 Das Tropaion von Adamklissi, 1903.
page 23 note 1 Jahreshefte, x, 87.