No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A note on the Peutinger Table and the fifth and ninth iters
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2012
Extract
It seems possible to reconcile these two authorities without much difficulty. A good deal depends upon the order in which the Peutinger stations are read, but here the Iter helps.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright ©O. G. S. Crawford 1924. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies
References
page 137 note 1 See Royal Commission on Hist. Mons. Inventory, Essex. 11, p. xxix.
page 137 note 2 Ibid. III, 140.
page 137 note 3 It is quite clearly an ‘n’ on Peutinger, but the confusion of ‘u’ and ‘n’ is common, and we may refer to the alternative readings Calunio and Caluuio, Gallunio and Galluuio, Sandonio and Saudonio, Panouius and Panonius, Daunoni and Dannom, Sarua and Sarna, Coguvensuron and Coguveusuron, all from the Ravenna lists; Combretonio and Combretouio (Conbretouio, Compretouio), from the Antonine Itinerary; and the certain error of Lemauio (for Lemanio) in the Peutinger Table itself.
page 138 note 1 Cf. Royal Commission on Hist. Mons. Inventory, Essex, 111, p. xxviii.