Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:51:20.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magistrates without Pedigree: The Consules Suffecti of the Triumviral Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2018

Francisco Pina Polo
Francisco Pina Polo*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of the suffect consulship began to change with Caesar in 45 b.c., after a number of decades in which no suffect consul had been elected. The office altered dramatically during the triumviral period. The triumvirs openly made use of the suffect consulship as a means of rewarding loyalty. Many of the suffect consuls, who were no longer elected by the people, but designated in advance by the triumvirs, were homines novi who belonged to previously unknown and insignificant Roman or Italian families. Increasing the number of consuls each year eliminated de facto the traditional annuality of the office and reduced its authority. The implicit consequence of these actions was a gradual devaluation of the consulship. The suffect consulship was therefore a powerful tool in the hands of the triumvirs for strengthening their political position, weakening the old aristocracy and giving birth to a new elite based more firmly on personal loyalties.

Keywords

Triumvirateconsulshipconsules suffectiRoman elitehomines noviprosopography
Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 108 , November 2018 , pp. 99 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bleicken, J. 1990: Zwischen Republik und Prinzipat. Zum Charakter des zweiten Triumvirats, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. 1995: ‘Chronology and succession 2: notes on some consular lists on stone’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 105, 279–96.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. 2000: The Praetorship in the Roman Republic, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bruhns, H. 1978: Caesar und die römische Oberschicht in den Jahren 49–44 v.Chr. Untersuchungen zu Herrschaftetablierung im Bürgerkrieg, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Dalla Rosa, A. 2015: ‘L'autocrate e il magistrato. Le attività di Augusto negli ambiti di competenza consolare’, in Ferrary, J.-L. and Scheid, J. (eds), Il princeps romano: autocrate o magistrato? Fattori giuridici e fattori sociali del potere imperiale da Augusto a Commodo, Pavia, 555–85.Google Scholar
Fadinger, V. 1969: Die Begründung des Prinzipats. Quellenkritische und staatsrechtliche Untersuchungen zu Cassius Dio und der Parallelüberlieferung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Ferriès, M.-C. 2007: Les partisans d'Antoine (des orphelins de César aux complices de Cléopâtre), Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Frei-Stolba, R. 1967: Untersuchungen zu den Wahlen in der römischen Kaiserzeit, Zurich.Google Scholar
Freyburger, M.-L., and Roddaz, J.-M. (eds) 1994: Dion Cassius. Histoire romaine Livres 48 et 49, Paris.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K., and Burton, G. 1983: ‘Political succession in the late Republic (249–50 BC)’, in Hopkins, K., Death and Renewal, Cambridge, 31–119.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. 2009: ‘La Res publica restituta et l'aristocratie augustéenne’, in Hurlet, F. and Mineo, B. (eds), Le principat d'Auguste. Réalités et représentations du pouvoir. Autour de la Res publica restituta, Rennes, 73–99.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. 2011: ‘Consulship and consuls under Augustus’, in Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Polo, F. Pina (eds), Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, Cambridge, 319–35.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. 2017: ‘La dualité du consulat à l’épreuve de la longue durée. À propos de la transgression et du contournement de la norme’, in Itgenshorst, T. and Le Doze, P. (eds), La norme sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains. Élaboration, diffusion et contournements, Bordeaux, 283–99.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. forthcoming: ‘Le consulat suffect sous Auguste et Tibère. Réalités institutionnelles d'une nouvelle pratique politique’, Revue d'Histoire du Droit français et étranger.Google Scholar
Kondratieff, E. 2015: ‘Finding Libo: epigraphic and topographic evidence for the cursus honorum of L. Scribonius L.F. Libo, cos. 34 B.C.E.’, Historia 64, 428–66.Google Scholar
Millar, F. 1973: ‘Triumvirate and Principate’, Journal of Roman Studies 63, 50–67 (reprinted in H. M. Cotton and G. M. Rogers (eds), Rome, the Greek World, and the East, vol. 1: The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution, Chapel Hill, NC, 2002, 241–70).Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2006: Caesar's Legacy. Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. forthcoming: ‘Losers in the civil war between Caesarians and Pompeians: punishment and survival’, in Beck, H. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (eds), Verlierer und Aussteiger in der ‘Konkurrenz unter Anwesenden’. Agonalität in der politischen Kultur des antiken Rom, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Roddaz, J.-M. 1992: ‘Imperium: nature et competences à la fin de la République et au début de l'Empire’, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 3, 189–211.Google Scholar
Rohr Vio, F. 2009: Publio Ventidio Basso. Fautor Caesaris, tra storia e memoria, Rome.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2008: Fasti Sacerdotum: A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish, and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 BC to AD 499, Oxford.Google Scholar
Salomies, O. 1991: ‘Zu den Fasti Consulares von Tauromenium’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 86, 187–92.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V. 1971: ‘The Lex Annalis under Caesar’, Phoenix 25, 246–71; 357–71.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V. 1973: The Orators in Cicero's Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology, Phoenix Supplementary volume 11, Toronto.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939: The Roman Revolution, Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1986: The Augustan Aristocracy, Oxford.Google Scholar
van der Blom, H. forthcoming: ‘Novitas between Republic and Empire’, in Tiersch, C. and Nebelin, M. (eds), Semantische Kämpfe zwischen Republik und Prinzipat? Studien zu Kontinuität und Transformation der politischen und sozialen Sprache in Rom, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wallmann, P. 1989: Triumviri Rei Publicae Constituendae. Untersuchungen zur politischen Propaganda im zweiten Triumvirat (43–30 v.Chr.), Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. 1971: Divus Iulius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Welch, K. 2012: Magnus Pius: Sextus Pompeius and the Transformation of the Roman Republic, Swansea.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1971: New Men in the Roman Senate 139 B.C– A.D. 14, Oxford.Google Scholar
Yavetz, Z. 1983: Julius Caesar and his Public Image, London.Google Scholar