^{page 237 note 1} See Ramsay in Ath. Mitth. 1882, p. 139, ff.

^{page 238 note 1} Among the more recent explorers who have examined parts of it are Ramsay (Ath. Mitth. 1882, p. 126, ff. and J.H.S. 1887, p. 482, ff.), Hogarth (J.H.S. 1890, pp. 152, 160) and Anderson (Annual of the B.S.A. 1897–8, p. 49, and J.H.S. 1898, p. 110). The present paper owes much and adds confirmation to the work of those scholars.

In 1908 I travelled from Bayat past Tchoghu to Bolavadin and Ishakli; in 1910 from the north side of the Eber Göl to Bolavadin and Tshai. In 1911 Sir W. M. Ramsay and I visited Tshai, the neighbourhood of Bolavadin, Hamidieh, Felleli, and Tshobanlar. In 1912 I passed through Tshai, Innli and Ishekler (on the south), Surmeneh, Felleli, Gunuk, Bayat, Tchoghu, Bolavadin, Afium Kara Hissar. Besides the inscriptions given in this paper, I found two new neo-Phrygian inscriptions, and made more complete copies of many of the older ones.

^{page 238 note 2} Anabasis, i, 2, 11.

^{page 238 note 3} J.H.S. viii, p. 491.

^{page 238 note 4} Zug der Zehn Tausend, p. 19.

^{page 238 note 5} So Ramsay, loc. cit.

^{page 238 note 6} J.H.S. 1887, p. 491.

^{page 239 note 1} B. V. Head, Hist. Numorum, 2nd ed. p. 678, by common slip of the pen, says “north-east.”

^{page 239 note 2} Hist. Geog. of Asia Minor, p. 434.

^{page 239 note 3} J.H.S. 1898, p. 110.

^{page 239 note 4} loc. cit.

^{page 239 note 5} B. V. Head, Hist. Num. 2nd ed. pp. 678, 682.

^{page 239 note 6} J.H.S. 1890, p. 161.

^{page 239 note 7} It is not likely to be part of a traditional decorative scheme commemorating the battle of Ipsus.

^{page 240 note 1} R. and C. on a bomos about 15 ins. high, Γϵωργὸσ ηωτικōῦ θϵōῖσ ᾀθανάτōισ ϵὐχήν.

^{page 240 note 2} J.H.S. 1911, p. 203, f.

^{page 241 note 1} Inscriptions nos. 50 and 51 on p. III of J.H.S. 1898 (Anderson) are not conclusive; the second is an ordinary village epitaph.

^{page 242 note 1} Octav. 37. In 38, he says that Augustus “equitum tuimas frequenter recognovit.”

^{page 242 note 2} Staatsrecht, iii, p. 494, n. 3 : cf. i, p. 359, n. 3, ii, p. 947, n. 5.

^{page 242 note 3} Tac. Ann. iii, 30.

^{page 242 note 4} See Ramsay, Cities and Bishoprics, p. 388, ff. on the name Aurelius.

^{page 242 note 5} Cities and Bishoprics, pp. 56, 76: see also G. F. Hill, Oesterr. Jahreshefte, ii, 245.

^{page 244 note 1} cf. γραμματϵὺσ τῶν μϵγάλων ἰϵρῶν ἀγώνων (Philadelphia), Ath. Mitth. xx, 244.

^{page 244 note 2} Liermann, Diss. Hal. x, 58; Levy, Rev. Études Gr. xii, 263, xiv, 370.

^{page 244 note 1} Ath. Mitth. 1882, 136, ff: he afterwards (J.H.S. 1887, p. 492) abandoned the identification of Augustopolis with Metropolis, which he now places at Kumbet beside the city of Midas.

^{page 245 note 1} J.H.S. 1887, p. 492.

^{page 245 note 2} Annual of the B.S.A. 1897–8, p. 50. Read χρήστōε άπϵλ(ϵνθέρōν) [Σϵβ.], or without [Σϵβ.], this being understood.

^{page 245 note 3} The name is not given in the Acta Eutychii, which speak of it only as θϵία κώμη.

^{page 245 note 4} Statius, Silvae, ¹, 5, 36–38.

^{page 245 note 5} e.g. Apollonia, Le Bas-Waddington, no. 1192, and often at Hierapolis, Humann-Judeich, Alt. von Hier. P. 94. n. 56.

^{page 245 note 6} Mélanges d'arch. et d'hist. 1882, p. 290, ff. See also C.I.L. iii 7005–7040.

^{page 245 note 7} B.C.H. 1904, p. 195. cf. Class. Rev. 1910, p. 11, nad 1913.

^{page 245 note 8} A similar collegium mulionum is mentioned on an imperial domain in Africa. See O. Hirschfeld in Klio, 1902, p. 296, n. I.

^{page 246 note 1} cf. Anab. i, iv, 9.

^{page 246 note 2} C.I.L. iii, 7172.

^{page 246 note 3} See Ramsay's paper on The Permanence of Religion at Holy Places in Western Asia, in Pauline and other Studies, pp. 163, ff.

^{page 247 note 1} Orat. v, 176, B-D.

^{page 247 note 2} Attis. seine Mythen und sein Kult (in Dieterich und Wünsch, Religionsgesch. Versuche und Vorarbeiten, vol. i), p. 188, ff.

^{page 247 note 3} Those who hold that the epitaph is Christian welcome every scrap of evidence which can be made to show that its language was the language which might have been used by a Phrygian pagan in the latter half of the second century of our era. The fact that scholars of the standing of Dietench and Hepding have taken the inscription to be pagan is a subtle compliment to the success with which its composer veiled his religion.

^{page 247 note 4} A late instance in Ramsay's Cities and Bishoprics, p. 541.

^{page 247 note 5} Miss Ramsay, Studies in the E. Rom. Prov. pp. 8, 23, f, 54.

^{page 247 note 6} Le Blanc, Manuel d'Epig. Chrét. p. 27, quoting De Rossi, De Christ, mon. ιχΘεν exhibentihus in Spicilegium Solesmense, vol. lii. The “fish” occurs in Rome from the second century to the end of the fourth.

^{page 247 note 7} Klio, 1910, p. 241.

^{page 248 note 1} Ath. Mitth. 1897, p. 31, (Körte).

^{page 248 note 2} Ibid. 1882, p. 132.

^{page 248 note 3} J.H.S. 1911, p. 161, ff. nos. vii and lxii. I hope shortly to justify the reading ATI or ATIE in the former inscription in the Journal of Hellenic Studies.

^{page 248 note 4} Ramsay, Hist. Geog. of A.M. p. 235; Klio, 1910, p. 241, f.

^{page 248 note 5} Sallustius phil. De diis et mundo, ch. iv; Hepding, Attis, etc. pp. 59, 197.

^{page 248 note 6} C.I L. iii. 7041.

^{page 248 note 7} Ath. Mitth. 1897, p. 32 He accentuates IIάπα, but see Kretschner, Einleitung, p. 344.

^{page 248 note 8} J.H.S. 1884, pp. 257, 260.

^{page 249 note 1} Hepding, Attis, etc. p. 112, n. 5.

^{page 249 note 2} In Galatia proper, no Late Phrygian inscriptions occur; the native tongue had yielded to the Celtic before Galatia was Hellenised.

^{page 249 note 3} Jabresh. Oest. Arch. Inst. 1905 (Beibl.), col. 85.

^{page 250 note 1} The evidence will be published later.

^{page 250 note 2} J.H.S. 1911, p. 161, ff. nos. iii, iv, v, vi, vii, viii, ix, xviii, xxxviii, xl, xlii, xliii, lxii, lxiii, and two unpublished inscriptions.

^{page 250 note 3} J.H.S. viii, p. 493.

^{page 251 note 1} xxxviii, 15.

^{page 251 note 2} Revue des études grecques, 1889, p. 23.

^{page 251 note 3} See Klio, 1910, p. 241.

^{page 251 note 4} See below, on inscr. no. 21.

^{page 251 note 5} Ramsay, Hist. Geog. of A.M. p. 235.

^{page 251 note 6} cf. Revue des études grecques, iii, p. 77.

^{page 251 note 7} On the meaning of this and the following inscription, see Ramsay, loc. cit. and Hirschfeld Verwaltungsbeamten, p. 168, ff.

^{page 251 note 8} Eph. Epig. iv, p. 34: cf. Revue des études grecques, iii, p. 77 (probably a different inscription).

^{page 252 note 1} C.I.L. iii, 7041.

^{page 252 note 2} Ibid. 7042.

^{page 252 note 3} J.H.S. 1911, pp. 158, ff. nos. 1, 2, 4, 5.

^{page 253 note 1} Ramsay, Cities and Bishoprics, p. 653, no. 564.

^{page 253 note 2} Anab. v, 3, 12.

^{page 253 note 3} Amer. Journ. of Arch. 1912, p. 55.

^{page 256 note 1} See J.H.S. viii, p. 49.

^{page 256 note 2} See Studia Pontica (Anderson, Cumont, Grégoire), iii, p. 227. Cumont there connects this activity with the Novella of 535, forbidding the expropriation of church property in all the provinces.

^{page 256 note 3} Ramsay, Studies in the E. Rom. Prov. pp. 337, 338.

^{page 256 note 4} Ramsay, Historical Geography of A.M. p. 232.

^{page 257 note 1} The letters TIK seem part of the governor's name. Between them and εηατικω there is room for AAM | IIP (abbreviation for λαμπρōτάτōε). This latter should however be preceded by ΤΟΤ, for which there is not room.

^{page 257 note 2} Cities and Bishoprics, p. 480, no. 362.

^{page 257 note 3} J.H.S. viii, p. 494.

^{page 257 note 4} See Hist. Geog. of A.M. p. 233.

^{page 258 note 1} See Klio, 1910, p. 241, and Kretschmer in Aus der Anomia.

^{page 262 note 1} Staatspacht, p. 15.

^{page 262 note 2} Oest. Jahresh. 1901, Beibl. col. 41.

^{page 263 note 1} Rostowzew, Röm. Kol. p. 304. An account, based on Rostowzew, of the much misunderstood Palestinian τϵλῶναι, the “publicans” of the Gospels, is given by Ramsay in Hastings' Dict. Bibl. v. 394.

^{page 263 note 2} Rostowzew, Oest. Jahresh. 1901, Beibl. col. 44.

^{page 263 note 3} Ramsay in Amer. Journ. Arch. 1888, p. 17.

^{page 263 note 4} Staatspacht, pp. 17, 18. The evidence refers to Egypt, but the conditions were similar in Asia Minor.

^{page 263 note 5} Cod. Theod. vii, 22, 1.

^{page 264 note 1} Rostowzew, Staatspacht, p. 161. After I had observed this parallel, I was glad to find that Rostowzew has used it in a similar way in his discussion of the estate which became the city Pogla (Oest. Jahresh. 1901, Beibl. col. 41). In his great work, Studien zur Gesch. des röm. Kolonates, p. 143, n. Rostowzew doubts if ἀρχιγϵωργōἰ was used in this sense. Wilcken has an excursus on the ὁμόλōγōι in the same work, p. 220, ff. See also de Zulueta in Vinogradoffs Oxford Studies, i, 51. The subject is obscure, and the analogy must not be pressed.

^{page 264 note 2} See, e.g. O. Hirschfeld, in Klio, 1902, p. 305.

^{page 265 note 1} In an inscription of this neighbourhood we find the form ἔδωκι for ἔδωκϵ, given by Ramsay as certain, in J.H.S. v, p. 254.

^{page 265 note 2} De Mag. P.R. iii, 20 καὶ ἀσηκρήτισ τōὺσ ἐπὶ τῶν σηκρήτων (ὐδὲ γὰσ άδσηκρήτισ κατά τōὐσ ἰδιώτασ ἐξ άγνōίασ μϵτὰ τōῦ δ στōιχϵίōε τῆσ πρōθέσϵωσ ἐπιβαλλōμένησ.)

^{page 265 note 3} On the significance of this, see Freeman's interesting paper in J.H.S. iii, 361–392.

^{page 266 note 1} λεπόν for λōιπόν occurs in Ramsay's Cities and Bishoprics, ii, p. 650.