Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:42:52.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commemoration and Élite Benefaction of Buildings and Spectacles in the Roman World*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Diana Ng
Diana Ng*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan-Dearborn
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current scholarship on élite munificence in the Roman Empire often sees architectural benefactions as being at least partially driven by the élite desire for personal commemoration. I use juristic opinions from the Digest and other textual evidence related to building gifts to argue that there was an ancient understanding of the physical and symbolic ephemerality of architectural benefactions. In contrast, I present legal and epigraphic evidence to argue that there was an explicit expectation for gifts of spectacles and monetary distributions to be lasting memorials for their donors, and that the perpetuation of identity was also a motivating factor in the euergetic choice of a spectacle.

Keywords

public monumentsélite benefactionthe Digestspectaclescommemorationinscriptions
Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 105 , November 2015 , pp. 101 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article began as a paper, ‘Architectural benefaction and monumentality: evaluating the evidence for the commemorative function of public architecture in the Greek East’, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America in Seattle, Washington, on 6 January 2013. I am very grateful to Dr Molly Swetnam-Burland, Dr Adrian Ossi, Dr Nora Ng, and Dr Robert Chenault for their perceptive comments and encouragement. I also thank the anonymous readers for their helpful critiques. All remaining errors are my own.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Babbit, F. C. (trans.) 1936: Plutarch. Moralia, Volume IV, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Boatwright, M. T. 1991: ‘Plancia Magna of Perge: women's roles and status in Roman Asia Minor’, in Pomeroy, S. (ed.), Women's History and Ancient History, Chapel Hill, NC, 249–72Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. T. 1993: ‘The City Gate of Plancia Magna in Perge’, in D'Ambra, E. (ed.), Roman Art in Context: An Anthology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 189–207Google Scholar
Bravi, A. 2011: ‘Le immagini negli spazi pubblici di Perge in epoca adrianea’, in D'Andria, F. and Romeo, I. (eds), Roman Sculpture in Asia Minor. Proceedings of the International Conference to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Italian Excavations at Hierapolis in Phrygia, held on May 24–26, 2007, in Cavallino (Lecce), Journal of Roman Archaeology Suppl. 80, Portsmouth, RI, 302–18Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. 1959: ‘Roman Asia’, in Frank, T. (ed.), An Economic Survey of Ancient Rome IV, Paterson, NJ, 499–916Google Scholar
Camia, F. 2011: ‘The financing of festivals in the cities of Roman Greece’, Tyche 26, 41–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champlin, E. 1991: Final Judgments: Duty and Emotion in Roman Wills 200 B.C.–A.D. 250, Berkeley, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, K. 2008: ‘Exchanging gladiators for an aqueduct at Aphrodisias (SEG 50.1096)’, Acta Classica 51, 31–46Google Scholar
Coleman, K., and Nelis-Clément, J. (eds) 2012: L'Organisation des spectacles dans le monde romain, Vandœuvres–GenevaGoogle Scholar
Cooley, A. (ed.) 2000: The Epigraphic Landscape of Roman Italy, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 73, LondonGoogle Scholar
Crosby, H. L. (trans.) 1946: Dio Chrysostom Volume IV. Discourses 37–60, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Dmitriev, S. 2005: City Government in Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, W. 1997: ‘Der Euergetismus im Funktionszusammenhang der kaiserzeitlichen Städte’, in Christol, M. and Masson, O. (eds), Actes du Xe Congrès International d'Épigraphie Grecque et Latine, Nîmes, 4–9 octobre 1992, Paris, 305–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, W. 1998: Die Verwaltung des römischen Reiches in der hohen Kaiserzeit, BasleGoogle Scholar
Fagan, G. 1996: ‘The reliability of Roman rebuilding inscriptions’, Papers of the British School at Rome 64, 81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, A. 2008: ‘Θέμιδες and the local élites of Lycia, Pamphylia and Pisidia’, in Rizakis and Camia 2008, 241–50Google Scholar
Frier, B. W., and McGinn, T. A. J. 2004: A Casebook on Roman Family Law, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Garnsey, P. 1971: ‘Taxatio and pollicitatio in Roman Africa’, Journal of Roman Studies 61, 116–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, D. 1985: ‘Munificence and municipia: bequests to towns in Classical Roman law’, Journal of Roman Studies 75, 105–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1976: ‘The Plancii of Perge and Diana Planciana’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 80, 231–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2007: ‘Three new letters of the emperor Hadrian’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 161, 145–56Google Scholar
Kalinowski, A. 2002: ‘The Vedii Antonini: aspects of patronage and benefaction in second-century Ephesos’, Phoenix 56 (1/2), 109–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennell, N. M. 2007 (31 August): Review of P. M. Nigdelis and G. A. Souris, Anthupatos Legei. Ena Diatagma Tôn Autokratorikôn Chronôn Gia to Gumnasio Tês Beroias. Tekmêria. Sumboles Stên Istoria Tou Ellênikou Kai Rômaikou Kosmou. Parartêma 1, Bryn Mawr Classical Review http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2007/2007-08-31.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kokkinia, C. 2000: Die Opramoas-Inschrift von Rhodiapolis, Euergetismus und soziale Elite in Lykien, BonnGoogle Scholar
Kokkinia, C. 2003: ‘Letters of Roman authorities on local dignitaries: the case of Vedius Antoninus’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 142, 197–213Google Scholar
Kokkinia, C. 2009: ‘The role of individuals in inscribing Roman state documents: governors’ letters and edicts', in Haensch, R. (ed.), Selbsdarstellung und Kommunikation die Veröffentlichung staatlicher Urkunden auf Stein und Bronze in der römischen Welt, Munich, 191–206Google Scholar
Kokkinia, C. 2012: ‘Games vs. buildings as euergetic choices’, in Coleman and Nelis-Clément 2012, 97–130Google Scholar
Kolb, A. 2008: ‘Das Bauhandwerk in den Städten der römischen Provinzen. Strukturen und Bedeutung’, Tyche: Beiträge zur alten Geschichte, Papyrologie und Epigraphik 23, 101–15Google Scholar
Laurence, R., Esmonde Cleary, S., and Sears, G. 2011: The City in the Roman West, c. 250 BC–c. AD 250, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longfellow, B. 2011: Roman Imperialism and Civic Patronage: Form, Meaning, and Ideology in Monumental Fountain Complexes, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Mansel, A. M. 1956: ‘Bericht über Ausgrabungen und Untersuchungen in Pamphylien in den Jahren 1946–1955’, Archäologische Anzeiger 1956, 34–119Google Scholar
Miller, W. (trans.) 1913: Cicero Volume XXI. On Duties, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1987: ‘Imperial building in the eastern Roman provinces’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 91, 333–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1990: ‘Festivals, games, and civic life in Roman Asia Minor’, Journal of Roman Studies 80, 183–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1993: Anatolia: Land, Men, and Gods in Asia Minor, Vol. I, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Mrozek, S. 1968: ‘Zur Frage der Tutela in römischen Inschriften’, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungariae 16, 283–8Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2003: ‘Art and identity in Asia Minor’, in Scott, S. and Webster, J. (eds), Roman Imperialism and Provincial Art, Cambridge, 192–213Google Scholar
Nollé, J. 1987: ‘Pamphylische Studien 6–10’, Chiron 17, 236–76Google Scholar
Nollé, J. 1993: Side im Altertum, Teil I, BonnGoogle Scholar
Nollé, J. 2012: ‘Stadtprägungen des Ostens und die “explosion agonistique”: Überlegungen zu Umfang, Aussagen und Hintergründen der Propagierung von Agonen auf den Prägungen der Städte des griechischen Ostens’, in Coleman and Nelis-Clément 2012, 1–46Google Scholar
Petzl, G., and Schwertheim, E. 2006: Hadrian und die Dionysischen Künstler. Drei in Alexandria Troas neugefundene Briefe des Kaisers an die Künstler-Verinigung, BonnGoogle Scholar
Pobjoy, M. 2000: ‘Building inscriptions in Republican Italy: euergetism, responsibility, and civic virtue’, in Cooley 2000, 77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pont, A.-V. 2008: ‘Évergètes bâtisseurs à Aphrodisias au Haut-Empire’, in Rizakis and Camia 2008, 181–208Google Scholar
Potter, D. S., and Mattingly, D. J. (eds) 2010: Life, Death, and Entertainment in the Roman Empire, New and Expanded Edition, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J. 2000: ‘New letters from Hadrian to Aphrodisias: trials, taxes, gladiators and an aqueduct’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 13, 5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, J. 2011: ‘In the élites' toolkit. Decoding the initiative and reference system behind the investment in the architecture and decoration of Roman nymphaea’, FACTA 5, 65–100Google Scholar
Rizakis, A. D., and Camia, F. (eds) 2008: Pathways to Power, Civic Élites in the Eastern Part of the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the International Workshop held at Athens Scuola Archeologica Italiana di Atene. 19 December 2005, AthensGoogle Scholar
Robert, L. 1984: ‘Discours d'ouverture du VIIIe Congrès international d'épigraphie grecque et latine à Athènes, 1982’, Actes du VIIIe Congrès International d'Épigraphie Grecque et Latine, Athens, vol. I, 35–45 = Opera Minora Selecta VI (1989), 709–19Google Scholar
Rogers, G. M. 1991: ‘Demosthenes of Oenoanda and models of euergetism’, Journal of Roman Studies 81, 91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roueché, C. 1993: Performers and Partisans at Aphrodisias in the Roman and Late Roman Periods, LondonGoogle Scholar
Şahin, S. 1999: Die Inschriften von Perge, vol. I, BonnGoogle Scholar
Şahin, S. 2004: Die Inschriften von Perge, vol. II, BonnGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. 2007: Monumentality and the Roman Empire, Architecture in the Antonine Age, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E., and Witschel, C. 1992: ‘Constructing reconstruction: claim and reality of Roman rebuilding inscriptions from the Latin West’, Papers of the British School at Rome 60, 135–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Nijf, O. 1997: The Civic World of Professional Associations in the Roman East, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Nijf, O. 2000: ‘Inscriptions and civic memory in the Roman East’, in Cooley 2000, 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Nijf, O. 2011: ‘Public space and the political culture of Roman Termessos’, in van Nijf and Alston 2011b, 215–43Google Scholar
van Nijf, O., and Alston, R. 2011a: ‘Political culture in the Greek city after the Classical Age: introduction and preview’, in van Nijf and Alston 2011b, 1–26Google Scholar
van Nijf, O., and Alston, R. (eds, with assistance of Williamson, C. G.) 2011b: Political Culture in the Greek City after the Classical Age, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. 1990: Bread and Circuses, Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism, Abridged with an Introduction by Oswyn Murry (trans. Pearce, B.), New YorkGoogle Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (trans.) 2006: Pliny the Younger, the Complete Letters, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ward-Perkins, J. B. 1984: From Classical Antiquity to the Middle Ages: Urban Public Building in Northern and Central Italy, AD 300–850, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Watson, A. (ed. and trans.) 1985: The Digest of Justinian, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
Weiss, P. 1991: ‘Auxe Perge. Beobachtungen zu einem bemerkenswerten städtischen Dokument des späten 3. Jahrhunderts n. Chr.’, Chiron 21, 353–92Google Scholar
Weiss, P. 1998: ‘Festgesandtschaften, städtisches Prestige und Homonoiaprägungen’, Stadion 24, 59–70Google Scholar
Wörrle, M. 1988: Stadt und Fest in kaiserzeitlichen Kleinasien: Studien zu einer agonistischen Stiftung aus Oenoanda, MunichGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, R. 1985: Städtisches Prestige und kaiserliche Politik, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, R. 2009: ‘Die Agonistik in Kleinasien des 2. und 3. Jahrhunderts n. Chr. — religiose, kulturelle und politische Bedeutung’, in Eckholdt, J.-F., Sigismund, M. and Sigismund, S. (eds), Geschehen und Gedächtnis die hellenistische Welt und ihr Wirkung. Festschrift für Wolfgang Orth zum 65. Geburstag, Berlin, 203–25Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. 2005: ‘The icing on the cake: benefactors, economics and public buildings in Roman Asia Minor’, in Mitchell, S. and Kastari, C. (eds), Patterns in the Economy of Roman Asia Minor, Oakville, CA, 167–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. 2007: ‘The ambiguity of munificence’, Historia 56(2), 196–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. 2009: The Politics of Munificence in the Roman Empire, Citizens, Élites and Benefactors in Asia Minor, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. 2013: ‘Cities, buildings and benefactors in the Roman East’, in Dickenson, C. P. and van Nijf, O. M. (eds), Public Space in the Post-Classical City: Proceedings of a One Day Colloquium held at Fransum, 23rd July 2007, Leuven, 173–92Google Scholar