Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:17:41.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

C. W. Westrup, Introduction to Early Roman Law. Comparative Sociological Studies. The Patriarchal Joint Family. II. Joint Family and Family Property, 1934. Pp. 192. III, I, Patria Potestas. I, The Nascent Law, 1939. Pp. 311. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard; London: Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press. Vol. II, 12s. 6d.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Fritz Schulz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews and Notices of Publications
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 1-2 , November 1942 , pp. 131 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Fritz Schulz 1942. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Savigny, Vont Beruf unsrer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft (3rd ed. 1840), 165. The comparative method was adopted by Savigny's antagonist Eduard Gans, Das Erbrecht in weltgeschichtlicher Entwicklung, 1824–1835.

2 See Huschke, Verfassung des Servius Tullius (1834), 252; Landsberg, , Geschichte der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft 3 (1910), 491Google Scholar; Kübler, Geschichte des römischen Rechts (1925), 2.

3 For older literature see F. v. Woess, Das römische Erbrecht und die Erbanwärter (1911), 138; Schulting-Smallenburg, , Notae ad Digesta 5 (1825), 18Google Scholar; Schimmelpfeng, Hommel Redivivus ad Inst. (2, 19), 2 and ad D. (2, 28), II; Glück-Mühlenbruch, , Ausführliche Erläuterung der Pandecten 36 (1833) § 1421h., 144Google Scholar. See further, e.g. Schirmer, , Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung (Roman. Abt.) 2 (1881), 165Google Scholar ff.; Hölder, ibid., 3 (1882), 213; 16 (1895), 277; 30 (1909), 85; B. W. Leist, Graeco-Italische Rechtsgeschichte (1884), 72; Jhering, Geist des röm. Rechts, 2 (4th ed. 1880), § 32a, 211Google Scholar; G. Carle, Le origini del diritto Romano (1888), 75; Beseler, , Beiträge 2 (1911), 34Google Scholar; 4 (1920), 231; Pappulias, , Zeitsckrift der SavignyStiftung 23 (1902), 528Google Scholar; Rabel, ibid. 50 (1930), 326; Bonfante, , Corso di diritto Romano 6 (1930), 184Google Scholar; Solazzi, , Diritto ereditario Romano 1 (1932), 160–4Google Scholar.