Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:10:38.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Britannia Statim Omissa’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Extract

Soon after the publication of my recent article on ‘The Dating-Value of Samian Ware’ I learned with much satisfaction that the attack I had endeavoured to meet was in reality no more than the preliminary bombardment of an isolated sector, and that it was to be followed very shortly by a general assault, in which no part of the front would be spared. This is what I have all along hoped for, having every confidence in the impregnability of the position. Nevertheless, hoste vicino, it may not be amiss to strengthen the defences by developing a line of evidence which has not yet been given the prominence to which it is entitled. I mean the literary tradition. Though accidental, the delay in dealing with it has been fortunate. In the interval the discussion has taken a turn which lends to the testimony of Tacitus a degree of significance that may well prove to be decisive, for it is Tacitus alone who counts. Before hearing what he has to say, it will be convenient to clear the ground by dismissing the less important witnesses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright ©George Macdonald 1937. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 JRS xxv, 187 ff.

2 Fronto, Ep. de bello Parth. (ed. Naber), 217 f.

3 JRS ix, 136 ff.

3a Roman Wall in Scotland 2, p. 2; per incuriam in JRS xxv, 188, I have made it 106–108.

4 Schwabe in P-W, s.v. ‘P. Cornelius Tacitus,’ col. 1575.

5 The MS. has ‘missa.’ The correction, now generally adopted by editors, was originally proposed by Lipsius and afterwards convincingly defended by Wölfflin, in Philol. xxvii (1868), 119 fGoogle Scholar.

6 The History of Tacitus, 210.

7 Geschichte der römischen Kaiserzeit i, 526.

8 Agricola, p. 50.

9 Roman Provinces (E.T.) i, 186. The rubric ‘Caledonia abandoned’ on p. 184 is a mistranslation. By ‘Verzicht auf Caledonien’ Mommsen meant ‘Idea of conquering the Highlands given up.’

10 Sat. iv, 127.

11 Lateinische Synonyme iii, 285.

12 Proceedings xxix (1932), 7 ffGoogle Scholar.

13 JRS ix, 113 ff.

14 l.c.

15 Church and Brodribb, l.c.