Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:57:55.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Violence at Constantinople in A.D. 341–2 and Themistius, Oration 1*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2015

Alexander Skinner
Alexander Skinner*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that Oration 1 by Themistius was prompted by violence at Constantinople in 341–2, and that the likeliest date for the speech is as early as March 342. Detailed arguments are presented in support of this correlation, which contrasts with the usual assignment of Themistius' speech to either 347/348 or 350/351. The wider significance of these arguments is also highlighted. In particular, there are implications for our understanding of the chronology and overall trajectory of Themistius' early career; and implications for the development of imperial ideology in the 340s.

Keywords

ConstantinopleThemistiusConstantius IIriotingclemencypanegyric
Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 105 , November 2015 , pp. 234 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Neil McLynn and Charlotte Roueché for their comments on a draft. I am also indebted to my wife, Natasha, both for commenting on a draft and for help with unicode font.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ballériaux, O. 1996: ‘Eugénios, père de Thémistios et philosophe néoplatonicien’, L'Antiquité classique 65, 135–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1981: Constantine and Eusebius, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 1993: Athanasius and Constantius: Theology and Politics in the Constantinian Empire, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Bouchery, H. 1936: ‘Contribution à l’étude de la chronologie des discours de Themistius’, L'Antiquité classique 5, 191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, S. 1994: ‘Constantine and the problem of anti-pagan legislation’, Classical Philology 89, 120–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. 1967: Augustine of Hippo: A Biography, LondonGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. 1995: Authority and the Sacred: Aspects of the Christianisation of the Roman World, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. 2002: Poverty and Leadership in the Later Roman Empire, Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
Bury, J. B. 1896: ‘Date of the Battle of Singara’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 5, 302–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltester, W. 1937: ‘Die Kirchen Antiochas im IV. Jahrhundert’, Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der alten Kirche 36, 251–86Google Scholar
Errington, R. M. 1988: ‘Constantine and the pagans’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 29, 309–18Google Scholar
Foerster, R. 1908: Libanii Opera, vol. 4, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Garland, R. 1990: The Greek Way of Life: From Conception to Old Age, LondonGoogle Scholar
Gladis, C[arolus = Karl]. O. 1907: De Themistii Libanii Iuliani in Constantium orationibus, BreslauGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. 1988: The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318–381, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Harries, J. 2012: Imperial Rome, AD 284 to 363: The New Empire, EdinburghCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heather, P., and Moncur, D. 2001: Politics, Philosophy, and Empire in the Fourth Century: Select Orations of Themistius, LiverpoolCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, H. 1958: The Canons of the Council of Serdica, AD 343: A Landmark in the Early Development of Canon Law, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. H. M., Martindale, J. R., and Morris, J. 1971: The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire: Volume I, AD 260–395, Cambridge (abbreviated as PLRE)Google Scholar
Klein, R. 1977: Constantius II und die christliche Kirche, Impulse der Forschung 26, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Lieu, S. N. C., and Montserrat, D. (eds) 1996: From Constantine to Julian: Pagan and Byzantine Views – A Source History, LondonGoogle Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1986: ‘Judicial savagery in the Roman Empire’, Chiron 16 (1986), 147–66, reprinted in idem, 1990: Changes in the Roman Empire: Essays in the Ordinary, Princeton, NJ, 204–17Google Scholar
Malosse, P.-L. 2001: ‘Enquête sur la date du discours 59 de Libanios’, L'Antiquité tardive 9, 297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J. 2000: Laying Down the Law: A Study of the Theodosian Code, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. F. 1992: Libanius: Autobiography and Selected Letters (2 vols), Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Portmann, W. 1989: ‘Die 59. Rede des Libanios und das Datum der Schlacht von Singara’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 82, 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portmann, W. 1992: ‘Zum Datum der ersten Rede des Themistius’, Klio 74, 411–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procopé, J. 1988: ‘Greek and Roman political theory’, in Burns, J. H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c.350–1450, Cambridge, 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, M. 1990: On Roman Time: The Codex-Calendar of 354 and the Rhythms of Urban Life in Late Antiquity, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
Schemmel, F. 1908: ‘Die Hochschule von Konstantinopel im IV. Jahr. P. Ch. n.’, Neue Jahrbücher für Pädagogik 22, 147–68Google Scholar
Scholze, H. 1911: De temporibus librorum Themistii, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, E. 1935: ‘Zur Kirchengeschichte des vierten Jahrhunderts’, Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der alten Kirche 34, 129–213Google Scholar
Seeck, O. 1906: Die Briefe des Libanius zeitlich geordnet, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Vanderspoel, J. 1995: Themistius and the Imperial Court: Oratory, Civic Duty, and Paideia from Constantius to Theodosius, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar