Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 March 2010
This paper examines the political content and context of Seneca's Natural Questions. It argues that, on the one hand, Rome is marginalized in the context of the immensity of the cosmos; and philosophy is elevated above traditional Roman pursuits, including political activity and historical writing. But at the same time the work is firmly anchored in its Roman geo-political context; Seneca situates himself in a long and continuing tradition of investigation of the natural world, where Roman writers can stand alongside Greeks and others; and the current emperor Nero is presented not just as princeps and poet, but as sponsor of geographical and scientific investigation.
Earlier versions of this paper were read to audiences at Mannheim and St Andrews, and I am grateful to those who offered criticisms or suggestions on each occasion. The paper has also benefited from the helpful suggestions of the Journal's Editor and anonymous readers. Professor Gareth Williams kindly allowed me to see the typescript of the paper published in this volume, pp. 124–46, and I have added some cross-references to his arguments. Of course all remaining deficiencies are my own responsibility. The paper was completed during a period of research leave funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, for which I am grateful.